Infrastructure/SCMSig/Agenda

From FedoraProject

< Infrastructure | SCMSig
Revision as of 22:21, 8 January 2010 by Akistler (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

SCMSig Agenda

Topic of the day - can we make "exploded tree" packages work?

Features

  • Easier to develop/maintain/share patches.
  • No longer need lookaside cache of tarballs.

Pitfalls

  • How do we separate "upstream" code from patches applied in the Fedora package.
  • How do we keep patches that are Fedora-specific and shouldn't be sent upstream from patches that should be.
  • This will likely require maintainers to become more familiar with whatever SCM is chosen.
  • Can no longer use lookaside cache to keep SCM size down.
  • How do we conditionally apply patches (e.g. for arch- or feature-specific patches)?
  • How can we verify that the code in our tree is identical to the upstream tarball?
  • Can we automate the conversion?

Examples