From Fedora Project Wiki
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Ideal Workflow

Update Submission (via web form/makefile target)

  • Make sure package is built and is being submitted for the release it is tagged for
  • Check for broken update paths
  • If not marked as a security issue, double check by scanning the severity/subject/group/etc of bugs, and the rpm changelog.

Pending Update Stage

  • Automatic QA of packages before they are submitted to the release team
  • fedora-qa, rpmlint, rpmdiff, repoclosure, etc.

Submitted to Release Team

(This entire step can be removed once either get a signing server or use detached gpg signatures from brew).

  • Release team signs package and tells the updates system to 'Push'.

Pushing

  • Moves packages to proper updates stage
  • Header generation via createrepo
  • Generate/insert extended update metadata into repo
  • Sync to mirrors
  • Comment/close associated bugs
  • Send update announcement mail
  • Send mail to developer

Moving packages from Testing to Final (Right now this step occurs when a developer chooses to 'Move update to Final'. Ideally, this system will provide an interface to allow testers to say whether a given testing update works or does not. From here, we can automate moving updates to Final once they receive a number of positive ACKS, or after a given number of days in updates-testing (w/o negative feedback).)

  • Move rpms to final stage directory
  • regenerate/reinsert metadata
  • Send update announcement mail

Automated Periodic Jobs

  • updates repo cleaner
  • remove old packages
  • remove unnecessary metadata from the updateinfo.xml.gz
  • nagmail
  • fetching of archive update mail urls