|Line 10:||Line 10:|
|Latest mainline (4.
|Latest mainline (4..x)
| Pretty much always the latest mainline tree.
| Pretty much always the latest mainline tree.
Revision as of 16:53, 1 August 2017
Assorted information related to the Fedora Linux kernel.
|Rawhide||Latest mainline (4.13.x)||labbott||Pretty much always the latest mainline tree.|
Each upstream major kernel release has a maintainer that follows the release through from merge window until it is no longer in a supported Fedora release. The field above shows which kernel releases match up with current Fedora releases, and who is maintaining that particular kernel. For example, labbott is maintaining 4.4 kernels in Fedora 22 and 23, jforbes is maintaining 4.5 kernels in F24, and will maintain F22 and F23 as they are rebased to 4.5. If in doubt, send mail to the kernel list (info below) rather than individuals. The maintainers are part of the Fedora Engineering team.
Fedora kernel mailing list
For discussion about Fedora related kernel package issues only. For "my kernel module doesn't work" type messages, see the http://kernelnewbies.org list, or linux-kernel.
Join thechannel on freenode.net.
Source checkout info
fedpkg co kernel
This gets you the git checkout and sets up branches for the current releases and master (devel). Once you have switched to the branch you care about (with git checkout branchname), fedpkg prep will create a tree.
You'll then be left with a kernel-3.X.? directory, containing both an unpatched 'vanilla-3.X.?' dir, and a linux-3.X.?-noarch hardlinked dir which has the Fedora patches applied.
The above command will require you to have SSH access to the Fedora pkg-git archives. If you want to do an anonymous checkout of the sources, you can use:
fedpkg co -a kernel
Contributing to the Fedora kernel
- If you are sending patches for the first time, there is a guide to help you.
- For one-off fixes, send them to the Fedora kernel mailing list, or if they are relevant upstream, send them directly to email@example.com and Fedora will inherit them on the next rebase
- If you are sending lots of changes to the Fedora kernel, then it may make more sense for you to get commit access. (Note, for most things, sending them upstream is far more preferable).
- To request commit access to the Fedora kernel:
- Get a fedora account if you don't already have one
- Visit the package db entry for the kernel and request access for the branch(es) which interest you.
- Please subscribe to the mailing list above. Important announcements regarding rebases, builds, patches being disabled, and much more happen there.
- If you're interested in adding an out-of-tree driver or similar to the Fedora kernel, please read KernelDriverPolicy first. See KernelStagingPolicy also.
- Here is a brief overview of the kernel.spec file
Fedora's kernels are signed during the build via the pesign client on a specific set of machines. To limit exposure of officially signed builds, only certain people can successfully submit builds that will be tagged into the various koji target tags. If you are not in this ACL then your build will start, but it will fail in the final tagging step. Scratch builds are not subject to this, so it is recommended to use that. If you want the ability to build kernels that go out to end-users when you 'fedpkg build', you need to be in the ACLs that allow builds to be tagged.
Please note the caveats on official builds.
- The kernel package currently builds many rpms, which means it ties up the build system for hours at a time. For this reason, coordinate with other developers on irc/fedora-kernel-list to be sure there isn't more than one build happening at once.
- Rawhide gets pushed once a day. If you think a build may occur later in the day for some reason, hold off on building. If in doubt, ask.
- If you are checking in patches for any branch other than rawhide, the build won't automatically go out to users, it needs to be processed through bodhi . Consider the negative effect of flooding end-users with too many updates, and coordinate your builds with others so that we push updates containing more than one fix.
- For the end-user who wants to build a custom kernel, we offer a separate wiki page with complete instructions.
As mentioned above, updates have to go through bodhi. Below is the process we use for filing a kernel update in bodhi.
- Fill in the package NVR, the bugs it fixes, and any notes you would like to include. Normally this is simply "The <kver> stable update contains a number of important fixes across the tree", or for a rebase "The <kver> rebase contains improved hardware support, a number of new features, and many important fixes across the tree."
- Ensure 'Suggest Reboot' is selected
- Ensure 'Enable karma automatism' is not selected
- Watch the commentary on the update, ensure bugs are filed for negative karma, etc
- After the update has been in updates-testing for a decent amount of time and has significantly positive karma (these are relative), push it to stable.
With the wide variety of hardware and use cases Fedora users have, we have found that enabling auto-karma can be detrimental. Often testers will give positive karma for their use cases, hit the auto-karma limit, and the update will be queued for stable before it even hits updates-testing. That significantly reduces the tester pool and can cause an update that introduces issues for a significant number of people to be pushed to stable. We delay intentionally to try and catch these cases. While we will never achieve a perfect update, it has helped quite a bit.
For stable Fedora branches, the updates essentially follow the upstream stable release schedule. Those tend to be released once a week or slightly less frequently. We do the minor update, build and submit, making sure that the N-1 update is in stable before pushing that release (unless N-1 is very broken.) E.g. When 3.19.2 is released, we push it to testing and make sure 3.19.1 is at least queued for stable. That way bodhi doesn't obsolete the 3.19.1 update. When we have a major rebase for a stable Fedora branch, we follow the same guidelines as above but simply allow more time for people to test.
For a Fedora release in Branched state, we tend to file updates at each relevant upstream milestone release. E.g. if that branch is working through the 4.0-rcX releases, we file an update once per -rc. As the Fedora release gets closer to GA, the kernel being shipped will transition to a stable upstream release. Then we essentially follow the same steps as above.
As mentioned in the previous section, Rawhide does not use bodhi for updates.
Below are some of the policies we use when it comes to various aspects of the Fedora kernel
- Information on the various debugging options used in Fedora kernels can be found at KernelDebugStrategy
- Contribution ideas for the Fedora kernel
- How to submit a patch upstream
- How to do various day to day tasks
- Building a custom kernel
- Building a non-debugging kernel
- How to use kdump to debug kernel crashes
- How to debug very early kernel panics
- Information on building upstream kernels by hand for testing can be found at Building a vanilla kernel
- Kernel Updates
- RawhideKernelNodebug The repository for rawhide kernels built without debugging enabled.
- Capturing USBMON output