From Fedora Project Wiki

Revision as of 20:55, 3 February 2009 by Kwade (talk | contribs) (board-discussion channel log)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

+stickster We are agenda-free today, 100% Q & A. 11:00
+stickster We may be awaiting one or two other Board members 11:00
+quaid ok, shall we ... wait a minute? 11:00
+quaid heh, there we go 11:00
+f13 Q: Does Fedora like burning trees, or saving kittens? 11:00
+quaid A: Yes 11:01
+f13 A: Burn them both! 11:01
+stickster I think we're still awaiting spot and h\h 11:01
+stickster I pinged them both 11:01
* mdomsch hears the cries of PETA 11:01
-!- h\h [] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:01
-!- mode/#fedora-board-meeting [+v h\h] by ChanServ 11:01
+caillon and dmitris 11:02
+quaid stickster: you have the back channel pingwtfru? 11:02
+stickster quaidYes 11:02
-!- darthmarth37|Wk [] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:02
+stickster Let's get started at 1905 UTC. 11:03
-!- glezos [n=mits@fedora/glezos] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:04
-!- mode/#fedora-board-meeting [+v glezos] by ChanServ 11:04
* quaid sets his stopwatch 11:04
+glezos hiya all 11:04
+stickster Hi Dimitris! 11:04
+stickster OK, let's get started 11:05
+stickster quaid: Whenever you're ready. 11:05
-!- SMParrish_ [] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:05
+quaid ok! 11:05
+quaid good day everyone, I'm your friendly moderator 11:05
+quaid I'll grab questions from the #-public- channel and paste them here 11:06
-!- zodbot [n=supybot@fedora/bot/zodbot] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:06
+quaid in rought order. 11:06
+quaid since we have some queued, shall we roll? or stickster do you want to say anything? 11:06
-!- v0idang3l [n=angel@] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:06
-!- edneymatias [] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:06
* quaid reaches to grab the mic back from stickster 11:06
+stickster We're ready to proceed with Q & A -- we kept the agenda clear so we'd have plenty of time for them. 11:06
+stickster quaid: Shoot. 11:06
+stickster And hi to all Board members :-) 11:07
+quaid ok, the first question led to the second, so I'll post them both: 11:07
+quaid viking_ice> How to compete with google and becoming world dominators 11:07
+quaid ke4qqq raises the question "What is Fedora's purpose?' and hands it to 11:07
+quaid </> 11:07
-!- MostafaDaneshvar [n=MostafaD@unaffiliated/mostafadaneshvar] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:07
+quaid i.e., the second question goes to the first. 11:07
+f13 First, world domination shouldn't be the goal of Fedora 11:08
+notting compete with google? in what context? (we're obviously not writing a search engine, nor are we planning on deploying massive amounts of worldwide infrastructure anytime soon) 11:08
+stickster We're not trying to index all the world's information, which is Google's raison d'etre IIRC. 11:08
+f13 this is a question the board struggled with last meeting 11:08
+f13 what we have agreed upon is that one goal of Fedora should be furthering the adoption of free and opensource software in the world. 11:09
+f13 but thats nice and hand wavy 11:09
+glezos Fedora's goal is to foster a healthy community of contributors with the goal of producing a complete and solid open source operating system. I don't think this comes in competition with Google. 11:09
+quaid notting, stickster -- it was a joke that pointed to the fact that people don't know the answer to what Fedora's purpose is 11:09
+notting quaid: well, in that case... "working on it" 11:10
+stickster The answer is slightly different if we're talking about the Fedora Project as opposed to Fedora the Linux distribution. 11:10
+mdomsch a) community; b) distribution... 11:10
-!- SMParrish [n=quassel@fedora/SMParrish] has quit [Read error: 113 (No route to host)] 11:11
+mdomsch the community goal is to provide a welcoming and vibrant workspace in which to develop open source software that people find useful (yeah, handwavy...) 11:11
+stickster "Purpose," "Goal," "Mission" are necessarily hand-wavy. 11:12
+mdomsch from that we are able to produce a distribution which people find useful in a variety of ways 11:12
+mdomsch and if we don't provide one they find useful, we certainly provide the tools to let them make one themselves which they find useful 11:12
+stickster I think what people want to know when they ask the question "What is Fedora," is more often, "How do we know what Fedora is not, so we don't end up spreading resources too thinly?" 11:13
+mdomsch fedora is not a brewery, though you may find it's members at one on occasion 11:13
+stickster I believe the purpose of the project is to pioneer the methods by which a community works together to advance FOSS. One of the ways we demonstrate those methods is through production of Fedora the distribution. I believe the purpose of the distribution should be to serve in a balanced way as a platform or development by its contributor constituents. 11:14
+notting well, the idea is to have a healthy and vibrant community, such that that community is capable of working on the various long tail uses, packages, etc. if they are interested 11:14
+stickster s/or devel/for devel/ 11:14
+h\h notting, well said 11:15
* f13 notes that we could probably wind up spending the entire hour talking about this 11:15
+notting the question is then to define what constitutes the long tail and what doesn't. for example, we've stated that secondary arches such as ia64 or s390 are part of that long tail, and not necessarily part of the core fedora mission 11:15
+mdomsch I like the "4 Fs" that the marketing team have been promoting 11:15
+stickster Yes, let's try and limit this question to stop about 1925 so we don't disregard others 11:15
* skvidal notes we have wasted other hours on it 11:15
+caillon stickster, hopefully "quality" is part of that definition of purpose. 11:15
+mdomsch are we often asked to provide something, a service or a product, to which there simply aren't resources available? 11:16
+stickster caillon: I think that should be part of our objectives, yes. 11:16
-!- John5342 [n=john5342@fedora/John5342] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:16
+quaid I can put a time limit on the question, if you wish 11:16
+quaid s/question/answer/ really 11:16
+mdomsch (unless one considers exhaustive QA and/or the package review backlog that lack of resources) 11:16
+stickster mdomsch: There's the constantly recurring question of a long-term support branch of Fedora. 11:16
+skvidal quaid: good call 11:16
+mdomsch or long-term support 11:16
+mdomsch stickster, yeah... 11:17
+quaid stickster: ok, I got the watch 11:17
+skvidal stickster: I like to call that the 'magical pony' branch 11:17
+f13 mdomsch: the question can come up when we're discussing the FEL question this week, about whether or not to ship the content that chitlesh wants to ship 11:17
+mdomsch skvidal isn't content with a pony in his choice of color and size, he wants it to be magical too? :-) 11:17
+mdomsch f13, pointer to discussion? 11:18
+skvidal mdomsch: well - considering a pony is POSSIBLE given the constraints of the universe 11:18
+skvidal mdomsch: a magical pony is not 11:18
+skvidal mdomsch: hence this is the magical pony branch 11:18
+skvidal b/c it is NOT possible 11:18
+ctyler I'm increasingly viewing Fedora (the product) as a constellation of open source packages, "the best of open source that works today" as skvidal said at FUDCon F8, which are useful to people in many different combinations: desktop, server, both, netbook, multiseat, whatever. 11:18
+f13 mdomsch: 11:18
+mdomsch I am perfectly fine w/ Fedora not having a long-term support strategy, FWIW 11:19
* skvidal doesn't recall saying something so optimistic as that 11:19
+f13 skvidal: shocking 11:19
* ctyler points skvidal to the FUDCon video 11:19
+skvidal I must have followed it up with "we're all going to die soon, anyway" 11:19
+stickster mdomsch: As am I. I find it's a distraction from forward momentum, especially when in the community space that void is filled by CentOS, or RHEL if you want paid support. 11:19
+h\h right 11:20
* ctyler nods 11:20
+stickster skvidal: Always Mary Sunshine. 11:20
+quaid the "best of open source that works today" is something Max has repeated; it came from Tiemann originaly iirc 11:21
+skvidal stickster: I have a middle name, too - but I won't use it in a public forum :) 11:21
+stickster skvidal: ;-) 11:21
+f13 MRFS 11:21
+ctyler mmcgrath points out that there are many kinds of (possibly conflicting) 'best' 11:21
+f13 or MRoFS. That's it, skvidal is forever hence known as mrofs. 11:21
+f13 mmcgrath has a good point 11:22
+stickster The point of having the entire project under a free license allows people to do outside the project with equivalent tools that which we may not be able to accommodate in-house. 11:22
+quaid <mmcgrath> ctyler: Its tricky to say "best" because its subjective. Saying "newest" or "most stable" is more objective. 11:22
+stickster So we can serve as an effective booster for even objectives in which we don't have a direct interest. 11:22
+f13 when we envoke the term best, we have to also determine who gets to decide what 'best' is. 11:22
+caillon well, best is ambiguous because we don't have a project goal. defining that goal is a first step to defining best. 11:23
* quaid mumbles about the Royal We 11:23
+ctyler When Fedora is a package constellation, there can be more than one 'best' present. 11:23
* stickster notes < 2 min warning. 11:23
+skvidal ctyler: up to a limit 11:24
+skvidal ctyler: at some point 'bests' conflict 11:24
* caillon runs out of bounds to stop the clock 11:24
* glezos notes that although the lack of a definition/mantra won't kill a project, the existence of one will definitely help guide the project and its people to the right direction at difficult times. 11:24
+notting right. it could be useful in light of the architecture discussions, or desktop vs. server, or... 11:25
+glezos I think it's by definition difficult to come up with an answer to this, but that doesn't mean we should give up trying to find the essence of what we are doing and represent. 11:25
+ctyler skvidal: right, but as long as there's energy to maintian both, spin X can utilize 'best X' and spin Y can use 'best Y' 11:25
* quaid notes time is up, do we want to suspend here ... 11:25
+stickster glezos: Yes, no one doubts the importance of the question. 11:25
+notting quaid ^Z 11:25
+stickster It's hard to answer and the Board is set to take up the discussion again next week. 11:25
+caillon quaid, it's probably fairest to the masses if we suspend, yes. 11:25
+quaid ok then 11:25
* mdomsch recalls Admiral Stockdale. 11:26
+quaid back to f-a-b with that discussion ... 11:26
-!- edneymatias [] has quit [Client Quit] 11:26
+quaid nirik> I'll bring up the question I always do: "What is the news on 11:26
+quaid the 'incident' last year, and when can we hear more? I was hoping 11:26
+quaid there was going to be some news, but I haven't seen anything" 11:26
+quaid </q> 11:26
+skvidal nirik: out of curiosity 11:26
+glezos The Board hasn't received any updates on this issue. 11:27
+skvidal if you could pick any answer you could get 11:27
+skvidal what would be a home-run answer? 11:27
+stickster There is nothing new to report at this moment, but I want to say that desepite naysaying to the contrary, no one has forgotten the fact that we owe the community a final disclosure report, nor trying to sweep that under the rug. 11:27
+notting skvidal: the offender has been found. his head is on a pike <here> 11:27
+caillon stickster, or at the least, you owe us some of those blue mind erasing sticks so we stop asking. ;-) 11:27
+notting that would be my wishcasting answer ;) 11:27
+stickster caillon: I like the asking, it keeps people honest. 11:28
+skvidal quaid: can you paste his response in here? 11:28
* quaid <nirik> skvidal: it would be: "we plan to release details in a press conference at 2009-xx-xx and will take questions then" 11:28
+f13 I'm sure skvidal could whip up some milk-of-amnesia 11:28
+skvidal nirik: can you be any more specific about the details you'd like that have not already been released? 11:29
+skvidal what, to you, is lacking in the currently released information 11:29
+skvidal I know what I want from it 11:29
+skvidal but I want to make sure I'm not an odd case 11:29
+skvidal (no one make any jokes about that last comment) 11:30
+skvidal :) 11:30
+glezos Once we have more information, I'd like to see the Board produce a full disclosure report and a plan of action for a similar event in the future. 11:31
+quaid nirik> skvidal: I think I would like to hear "it was a failure of: people or packages or process" and I would love to hear that the people or packages or process were fixed both for fedora and anyone using the fedora distro. 11:31
+glezos If under the same circumstances the same approach will take place, we should discuss if we can change something so that we can act differently in the future. 11:31
+skvidal nirik: okay, thanks. 11:31
+notting the people were fixed? ouch. that can hurt. 11:31
+f13 notting: hey, you brought up heads on pikes. 11:31
* quaid buzzes five minute timer on this answer 11:31
* skvidal is done 11:32
+mdomsch mmcgrath has been working on a plan for "if something similar happens again" (crosses fingers it won't) 11:32
* caillon first read that as if the plan was to cross fingers... 11:32
+quaid ok, next question ... 11:33
+glezos mdomsch: good to know, thanks 11:33
+quaid JKnife> quaid_moderator: Ok, serious question, Is RedHat ever going to 11:33
+quaid do main stream ads for Fedora(like on TV or Radio)? 11:33
+stickster mdomsch: Yes, mmcgrath and I met at FUDCon and talked about that as a matter of fact. 11:33
+stickster JKnife: I don't believe so. Mainstream ads on TV and radio are extremely expensive and don't necessarily attract an audience of contributors for Fedora. 11:33
-!- lmacken [n=lmacken@nat/redhat/x-b6d73737f76f7dac] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:33
+f13 To what end? What would be the end result benefit for Red Hat or the Fedora project? 11:34
+mdomsch a) ever is a long time; b) I haven't seen a Red Hat commercial ad for their own products 11:34
+h\h in which country? :) 11:34
+stickster mdomsch: good poing on (B). 11:34
+stickster *point, even. 11:34
+caillon mdomsch, closest we've had is a full page in NYT, iirc. 11:34
+skvidal and what would the ad be like 11:34
+notting i think we'd have to define the purpose and audience of Fedora before we have ads 11:34
+stickster Our Ambassador crew is our main grassroots effort to spread Fedora to the masses and they do a spectacular job. 11:34
+skvidal "Heard of linux? No? Then this is going to be confusing!" 11:34
+stickster notting: heh. 11:35
+mdomsch "we're in your pocket, owning your iPhone..." 11:35
+notting i mean, we could hire Alec Baldwin to tell people that Fedora's an evil plot to destroy the world, but it's probably not practical 11:35
+mdomsch or we could hire BillG and Seinfeld 11:36
+f13 would be fun though 11:36
+glezos Thinking about the full-page Firefox newspaper ad, I'd like stress out here the power of the community itself. 11:36
+stickster But I'd like to see him re-enact the Glengarry Glen Ross scene, only with Fedora before the steak knives. 11:36
* glezos would *love* to see something like :) 11:36
+f13 It might be useful to take out adds for Fedora events in local media outlets around the event 11:36
+notting stickster: that should be your next state-of-fedora speech at fudcon 11:36
+mdomsch mozilla got quite a lot of (free) attention by announcing they were going to try setting a world record for downloads 11:36
+stickster notting: Don't tempt me. 11:37
+f13 either events purely Fedora, or bigger events that Fedora happens to be participating in. 11:37
+mdomsch f13, Fedora ran an ad several days in the MIT student paper before FUDCon 11:37
+stickster Mozilla also has a broader-based product appeal. Remember that it runs on Windows. 11:37
+f13 mdomsch: yeah, stuff like that. 11:37
+f13 stickster: well, we run in PCs, Macs, etc... (: 11:38
+stickster You know what I meant. 11:38
+stickster :-) 11:38
+caillon and a very high percentage of their userbase overlaps with windows users 11:38
+f13 yes 11:38
+f13 and overlaps with TV watchers 11:38
+h\h marketing by writing nice blogs and howtos how to get done with free software and fedora helps more than any tv or radio add, I think 11:39
+f13 whereas I bet we have a high percentage of our target audience skipping commercials due to PVR devices 11:39
+stickster h\h: That's way more effective with the kind of audience that we want to encourage to actually *get involved* in Fedora. 11:39
+mdomsch we need a Fedora logo on the side of Starbuck's shiny viper 11:39
+f13 To sum up, I doubt we'll see Red Hat advertise on TV for Fedora any time soon, however we would like to see better advertisement targets used. 11:40
+stickster This is something that bears mention again -- that given a limited resource budget (not just money, but also people, time, energy, etc.), we concentrate on bringing in contributors to Fedora, not consumers. 11:40
* quaid notes that by focusing on contributors, we leverage 1:1,000,000 where focusing on consumers leverages a dismal 10:1 ... in terms of affecting community growth. 11:40
+mdomsch product placement is where it's at 11:40
+stickster Heh, I think we all just summarized the same way. Kismet! 11:40
+quaid mdomsch: if only the animation studios would put Fedora t-shirts on characters 11:40
+quaid stickster: and on that ... next q? 11:40
+stickster quaid: You're moderating, pipe down :-) 11:40
* quaid is trying! 11:41
+stickster +1 11:41
* ctyler wonders if a stunt similar to the WSJ firefox think might have value, though 11:41
+f13 quaid: they use our software, surely we can insert a watermark somewhere (: 11:41
+notting mdomsch: so, we're competing with ? 11:41
+quaid <EvilBob> I have a question, I recently heard about the Red Hat Summit 11:41
+quaid in Chicago. It is my understanding that there will not be a FUDcon 11:41
+quaid tied to this event that is in the middle of the coasts allowing 11:41
+quaid contributors from the plains and midwest more of a chance to get to a 11:41
+quaid FUDcon. Why was this decision made. 11:41
+quaid <EvilBob> quaid_moderator: add to my FUDcon query, WHat funding is 11:41
+quaid available if the community got something arranged in the area. 11:41
* quaid notes the answer to the second was discussed wrt NA Ambassadors 11:41
+quaid </q> 11:41
+f13 THe board talked about this 11:41
+f13 We felt that the FUDCon attached to the RH Summit in BOS was a poor example of FUDCon compared to when we weren't attached to any event 11:42
+stickster It actually has nothing to do with geography and everything to do with the success (or lack thereof)) at the last Summit-colocated FUDCon. 11:42
+f13 and instead we'd like to perhaps see a Fedora Activity Day happen there, as opposed to a general FUDCon 11:42
+mdomsch s/colocated/concurrent/ 11:42
+stickster f13: +2. 11:42
+stickster mdomsch: That too! 11:42
+stickster Having a whole FUDCon at the Summit is distracting, expensive, and a logistical nightmare. 11:43
+glezos I think history has shown that our most successful FUDCons were ones that were not hosted together with another event. 11:43
+stickster I would note that mmcgrath is trying to get a FAD together in Chicago to work on infrastructure, but the event could be expanded through collaboration with him and whoever else is currently planning such an event. 11:44
+stickster glezos: Exactly 11:44
+f13 It also calls into question what it is we want to aaccomplish with FUDCons 11:44
+caillon how many have we had with another event? i think there's a fairly small sample size here... 11:44
+stickster By "expanded" I mean, could include one or two other targeted areas ((as opposed to morphing into a FUDCon, which would defeat the point). 11:44
+f13 having a large number of developers in the same area/time has generated some good results. 11:44
+f13 the same can be said for a large number of non-"developer" type folks 11:44
+stickster caillon: It also happened with the FUDCon EMEA @LinuxTag 2008. 11:45
+f13 and those two things don't have to happen at the same time/place 11:45
+stickster The pattern was hard to ignore at that point. 11:45
+mdomsch I like the idea of using FUDCon as a planning tool for upcoming releases 11:45
+mdomsch which we haven't really done explicitly 11:45
+stickster I think FADs give us an opportunity to do higher-touch, more user-centric events too. 11:45
+f13 I do too, as well as a twice annual brain dump 11:45
+glezos Seeing the success of FUDCon Brno, our aim right now is to try and distribute FUDCons around the world, expanding their impact to a much larger community than before. 11:45
+stickster glezos: s/FUDCons/Fedora events/ 11:45
+glezos stickster: right. 11:45
+f13 there are two challenges. 11:46
+f13 1) getting Red Hat people sent around that work on Fedora. 2) getting non-Red Hat people sent around that work on Fedora 11:46
+glezos stickster: FADs might also address much lower-touch, highly developer-centric events, like hackfests, coding sprints, etc. 11:46
+f13 1 gets easy by doing things on the East Coast of the US. Huge number of people already there, relatively smaller numbers to fly in 11:46
+f13 doesn't help with 2 at all 11:46
+stickster glezos: Absolutely, they can do either -- or both, with two rooms. 11:46
+f13 to help with 2, we need to find more activities we can do in other places, that don't necessarily require/benefit from having a high number of Red Hat Fedora contributors. 11:47
-!- spot [n=spot@redhat/spot] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:47
-!- mode/#fedora-board-meeting [+v spot] by ChanServ 11:47
+stickster f13: Right, that's where FADs come in. 11:47
+f13 yep, trying to set the table for those 11:47
+ctyler More events will be fantastic. Getting as many people as possible in one place is great, too. I hope we can do both. 11:47
* quaid notes we have several questions in the queue still 11:48
+f13 like anything, we have to be responsible about how we spend our resources. 11:48
+skvidal I think this horse is dead 11:48
+f13 not just the $$ in Fedora's coffers, but also the resources of our contributors 11:48
+stickster The idea is that FADs can be set up by community members and a smaller funding amount goes much further with it being more of a local/regional event.j 11:48
* mdomsch notes his blog post yesterday too. FUDCons aren't the only places to discuss Fedora projects. 11:48
+stickster Maybe we should move on further in the q-queue. 11:48
+f13 stickster: +1 11:48
* glezos will also bring the example of online development sprints, which were very successful in the Django project. A few people get together in various locations in the world and the others from home hacking together on IRC. This is something that should probably be discussed on -advisory-board though and will need someone to prove it works by actually trying it. 11:49
+quaid * viking_ice raises hands and asks a serious question: Why don't we replace the offical GA release with an updated one from Fedora Unity and archive the GA release when they have released an updated GA release ? 11:49
* glezos eof 11:49
+quaid eoq 11:49
+skvidal b/c it would mean 1. reving the world 2. mirrors would hate us. 3. recertifying for export, I believe 11:50
+skvidal it's a lot of work for questionably much benefit, imo 11:50
+caillon also, why would i download the "final release" if it's buggy and going to have a bugfix update in a few weeks? 11:50
+ctyler minimal win since the release cycle is so short 11:51
+f13 "nobody runs a .0 release" 11:51
+h\h there is no dot in fedora :) 11:51
+f13 I have a hard time believing that we'll continue to have enough bandwidth to concentrate on the next fedora, if we try to add even more releases into our plate. 11:51
+mdomsch Unity provides a useful bit of work, and I'm glad they do. Keep it up. I see that as additive, but it need not replace what is hosted on the mirrors. 11:52
+skvidal and he means both network and mental bandwidth 11:52
+f13 its not like we're doing such a great job in the first place. 11:52
+quaid * viking_ice answers skvidal: Just alone the whole i586 should be enough for justifying the their being or an updated GA existance 11:52
+stickster I understand that the Ambassadors already hand out Unity respins at shows, which I think is a fine thing. 11:52
+skvidal what i586 incident? 11:52
+quaid s/i586/i586 incident/ 11:52
+f13 I'd rather see us work to improve the process for the official release so that we won't have as great a calling for respins. 11:52
+skvidal sigh - what other bugs should we respin for? 11:53
+stickster Delta rpms might help? 11:53
+skvidal stickster: somewhat - it'll diminish the size of things 11:53
+stickster Yeah, that's all I was saying. :-) 11:53
+mdomsch but not the number of updates being pushed... 11:53
+skvidal and the way we have in mind delta from original -> NOW should be nice 11:53
+f13 it'll diminish the size of things users download, not mirrors 11:53
+f13 it'll /increase/ the size of our mirror footprint and bandwidth costs 11:53
* stickster wants us not to wander too far into the weeds here. 11:53
+skvidal but they're so pretty 11:54
+quaid herlo> stickster: (in f-board), we did hand out Unity discs, but I'd like them to become more official and thus want to press them if it can be blessed by the board. 11:54
+quaid ok 11:54
+skvidal look at this one with the shiny leaves of three 11:54
+skvidal let me lick it 11:54
+mdomsch I care somewhat less about mirror space and bandwidth (we seem to manage), but in people concentration bandwidth 11:54
+quaid next q? 11:54
+mdomsch both consumers (hmm, which one should I download), and developers/testers. 11:54
+quaid <inode0> quaid_moderator: is cowsay code or content? ... the question really is how can I look at a package and classify it as code or content 11:55
+stickster herlo: That's a distinct possibility. 11:55
+stickster That sounds like more of a FESCo question to me. 11:55
+stickster Sorry, I meant: 11:55
+f13 well, taking the question literally, you 'run' cowsay to produce something 11:55
+stickster inode0: That sounds like more of a FESCo question to me. 11:55
+f13 you don't read cowsay contents in another application 11:55
+f13 but the actual question, do you find our current wiki page not suitable to help you make that decision? If so, that really sounds like a FESCo/Packaging SIG issue 11:56
+stickster quaid: Next q, I'd say. 11:57
+h\h /exec cowsay Moo! 11:57
* stickster thinks of his favorite knock-knock joke. 11:57
+h\h f13: you would read cowsay contents in xchat :) 11:57
+f13 *cough* 11:58
+stickster quaid: Next q please? 11:58
+quaid ok 11:58
+quaid * viking_ice raises hands and asks another one ( not sure if that's a micro one as well ) Now with the ability to create a "live" cd should'nt Fedora stop officially site with a specific DE ( Now it's Gnome ) and allow all DE to compete on a fair ground and all reference to "Desktop" would strictly be a generic one ( containing a just a list of all the DE's that Fedora offers ) ? 11:58
-!- lmacken [n=lmacken@nat/redhat/x-b6d73737f76f7dac] has left #fedora-board-meeting [] 11:58
+h\h "compete" .. is there a winner? 11:59
+f13 I think that's a bit of a misnomer. We don't actually produce anything called a Fedora Desktop 11:59
+f13 We have a Fedora Live image, which is loosely tied to the Fedora installer sets 11:59
-!- nemo [] has joined #fedora-board-meeting 11:59
+mdomsch they don't all fit on a single CD... 11:59
+notting 'now with the ability to create a "live" cd'? this isn't a new thing, we've been this way for many releases 11:59
+f13 We have specific spins geared toward specific desktop environments, such as the KDE, XFCE, LX?? spins 12:00
+glezos I think we should have a Live CD which has passed through our QA process and everything. At the same time, we should encourage and support community SIGs to produce Live CDs of their own and even urge them to make them first-class ISOs as well (shipped on release date, etc) 12:00
+ctyler f13: the Gnome live disc is called "Fedora 10 Desktop Edition" on 12:00
+notting ctyler: and also says that's it's GNOME right there in the description 12:00
+f13 However, our Fedora spin takes elements from not just gnome, but non DE specific things too 12:00
+f13 hrm. 12:00
+f13 I guess some marketing things have changed since we first decided to make the live images. 12:00
+caillon well the SIG name hasn't changed... 12:00
+caillon and AIUI, it's produced by the desktop SIG 12:01
* stickster notes there's a Desktop SIG and 12:01
+stickster nm, caillon is there already. 12:01
+ctyler current names on website are "Fedora 10 Desktop Edition" and "Fedora 10 KDE Desktop Edition" 12:01
+f13 The current state that things are in, the fact is that advancements tend to happen in our Gnome desktop world first, and that's what the Fedora project puts out there as our "best foot forward" for lack of abetter term. 12:01
+f13 NetworkManager and PackageKit being two recent examples of this 12:02
+caillon (did we ever get knetworkmanager?) 12:02
+notting caillon: we did, and it's being replaced with a plasmoid in kde4.2, iirc 12:02
+stickster caillon: /me was just talking with a contributor about kpackagekit earlier. 12:02
+caillon nod 12:03
* caillon has had a few of those talks lately too 12:03
+stickster I think it suffices to say that Fedora will always have a place for DE SIGs to feature their work as official spins 12:03
+stickster Subject to all the normal stuff to which Spins are subject. 12:03
+f13 THere is even room for a GNOME spin, which specifically uses things from teh gnoem project instead of more generic things 12:04
+stickster Right. 12:04
+f13 like a different browser, maybe a different IM toolset, etc... 12:04
+stickster skvidal: Please give your opinion on the horse, doctor. 12:04
+notting the epiphany spin? seems like overkill, but I suppose if someone's that motivated... 12:04
+skvidal stickster: DEAD 12:04
+mdomsch e12 12:04
+caillon notting, is that the epiphany webkit or the epiphany gecko spin? 12:05
+skvidal stickster: stiff 12:05
+skvidal stickster: rotting, actively 12:05
+notting mdomsch: surely that's the e17 spin 12:05
+f13 notting: is it really any more overkill than the BrOffice spin? 12:05
+skvidal stickster: oh, look, maggots 12:05
* quaid ready with the next question 12:05
+quaid <poelcat> quaid_moderator: Q: What key strategic initiatives is the 12:05
+quaid board pursuing for 2009? 12:05
+notting f13: ugh 12:05
+quaid sorry, pasted early, but go ahead if you wish 12:05
+stickster QA. 12:05
+f13 hey look, poelcat just gave me BS Bingo! I WIN! 12:05
+f13 Yes, QA 12:06
+f13 I've taken on QA as my special interest as a board member. 12:06
+notting 1) defining the fedora target as stated earlier in the meeting. we hope to have this done by the end of 2009 12:06
+h\h leverage the shareholders income, I guess.. 12:06
+stickster notting: cheeky monkey. 12:06
+f13 What that means is that I keep an eye on whats happening there, reporting to the board, and well stepping in to get my hands dirty where I can 12:06
+f13 and helping to drive board attention and resources to further the QA effort 12:06
* mdomsch wants to redefine the Fedora Project as a bank, so we can receive TARP funds to spend on TV advertising 12:06
+stickster We look at Red Hat's hiring of Adam Williamson to be a key investment in Fedora QA for coming releases 12:07
+f13 also we have a couple important distribution releases to get done in 2009 12:07
* mdomsch is excited by the Fedora Cloud work that mmcgrath talked about at FUDCon 12:07
+notting f13: the next release is the most important release in the history of Fedora! 12:08
+stickster mdomsch: I think the question was specifically about the Board's initiatives 12:08
+h\h notting, for f13 it's F13 :) 12:08
+stickster Keeping in mind that we don't have dedicated budget or people, but only (hopefully) the energy to help promote things we believe will provide good long-term results for the Fedora Project. 12:08
+glezos One of my personal goals is to continue having Fedora be the leader in niche aspects of the open source development ecosystem. 12:09
+stickster Such as L10n perhaps? 12:09
+stickster :-) 12:09
+glezos Our open build system, custom live spins were highly innovative solutions 12:09
+glezos stickster: and that. :) 12:09
* skvidal has a goal 12:09
+caillon poelcat, what specific initiatives would you like to see pursued? 12:09
+h\h caillon, smart move :) 12:10
+skvidal I'd like to see more upstream projects realize the benefit they get of working more closely with fedora 12:10
+skvidal so that upstream devels are tied in to fedora bit more tightly, that, through peer-pressure, will drive more users towards us 12:10
+glezos we should pursue in keeping and enforcing this leadership Fedora is showing. 12:10
+skvidal to devels, we should be the "cool kids" 12:10
+skvidal to users - the devels are the cool kids 12:10
+skvidal the users will follow what the devels blog and tweet about 12:10
+skvidal and I want that to be fedora 12:11
+quaid <poelcat> quaid_moderator: to caillon: the fedora board is often compared to corporate boards at publicly traded companies so I was wondering what goals and objectives the fedora board is setting and how they plan to lead fedora forward 12:11
+stickster I'd like to look at the state of Sugar/OLPC software in ~6 months to see what the impact of that work has been outside of OLPC 12:11
+stickster I'd also like to see our Marketing team working on a more externally-focused set of objectives, i.e. consistent messaging to non-Fedora and non-FOSS audiences 12:12
* stickster backs off mic 12:13
+stickster Anyone else? 12:13
+ctyler I'd like to see Fedora become the distro of choice for teaching how to get involved in an Open Source community. 12:13
+caillon poelcat, i'm not sure that comparison is 100% fair, but i think part of it depends on a decision for what fedora's goals as a project are defined as, and part depends on individuals on the board's pet projects, so isn't necessarily representative for the board as a whole. 12:14
+ctyler I think we're in the strongest position of any of the main distros for that. 12:14
* glezos would like to see poelcat's question discussed in more detail on a Board phone meeting and come up with more specific and consistent answers. 12:14
* h\h 2 12:14
+caillon so i'm rather keen on getting a definition which should help shape the rest of what we do. 12:15
+stickster I think that having individual "pet projects" is more reflective of the fact that the resources the Board can marshal are limited beyond ourselves. 12:15
+caillon that said, i've got a strong interest in furthering the desktop and improving our QA efforts, myself. 12:15
+skvidal caillon: can you get more of the desktop team blogging about what they're doing? 12:15
+glezos skvidal: that would be great. 12:16
+stickster Notwithstanding what notting half-joked about earlier, and caillon reiterates. Tightening the definition of Fedora is a worthy goal, I think. 12:16
+skvidal caillon: esp blogging on places picked up by planet gnome - I see a lot of ubuntu posts on planet gnome - but not a lot of fedora-related ones 12:16
+caillon skvidal, i'd love to. though that may come in the form of seeing lots more of my mug on planet doing reports 12:16
+stickster caillon: Don't tease us. 12:17
+skvidal caillon: I don't mind, you're reasonably cute :) 12:17
+glezos skvidal: there's a lot of Ubuntu talk and less Fedora talk at GUADEC as well. 12:17
+caillon skvidal, aw, you're making me blush 12:17
+skvidal caillon: but getting those posts on the desktop-planets wouldn't hurt 12:17
+caillon trust me, i know. it's a real goal for me. 12:18
+stickster It's not even a matter of trying to be louder, it's simply letting people know about all the cool work going on. 12:18
+skvidal caillon: cool. thanks 12:18
+stickster yup, thanks caillon 12:18
+stickster quaid: Next Q? 12:18
+quaid do you want more qestions? 12:18
* quaid lost a 'u' 12:18
+quaid <spoleeba> quaid_moderator, speaking of contributors...... here's my 12:18
+quaid question... have we identified target groups to seek out as 12:18
+quaid contributors? Or are we content with a walkin only approach to 12:18
+quaid recruitment? 12:18
+stickster I'm game but respect that some Board members are overtasked today 12:18
* ctyler needs to step out shortly 12:18
+notting i think recruitment needs to happen more at the sig/task level, not as a board level 12:19
+caillon or at the school level *cough*ctyler 12:19
+stickster The people we'd want to recruit for Docs task probably have a different general profile from people who would make, say, good packagers 12:19
+ctyler caillon: absolutely :-) 12:19
+notting at the global level, we can probably at best do a 'interested in contributing? see <x y z>' (examples of ways to contribute, and who/where to see for more info) 12:20
+glezos or at LUGs. 12:20
* skvidal gets out the razorblades 12:20
+notting i.e., the join-fedora page 12:20
+mdomsch I think we do do that; the K12LTSP integration that warren has been working on. The FEL work. The audio guys from Stanford that joined up a few years back... 12:20
+f13 We want to recruit people that want to contribute. 12:21
+stickster Some of the new infrastructure folks who have worked out very well. 12:21
+f13 beyond that.... 12:21
+mdomsch planet CCRMA that was... 12:21
+stickster I would say that finding people who want to contribute is a harder task than finding people with the right skill sets to do so. 12:22
+stickster Shall we take another question? 12:22
* ctyler regretfully steps out, will read scrollback later 12:22
+stickster Thank you ctyler! 12:22
-!- Trollkarlen [] has quit [Read error: 110 (Connection timed out)] 12:22
* skvidal has another meeting in 8 minutes, too 12:23
+stickster quaid: What does the queue look like? 12:23
+quaid three q 12:23
+stickster Let's take one and call it a meeting. 12:23
+f13 Yes, no, and orange. Seeya! 12:23
+stickster f13: wrong, cerulean. 12:23
+caillon ecru 12:23
+stickster maize. 12:23
+quaid ok, I'm going to pick 12:23
+quaid inode0> Question: could the board collect some questions in advance of these meetings so more thought could be given to them before the board discusses them? 12:23
* quaid thinks the others were derivative and covered ground already covered. 12:24
+f13 I don't see that as a bad idea 12:24
+stickster inode0: I think that's the purpose of the fedora-advisory-board list, which is open to everyone. 12:24
+notting ooh, good idea. 12:24
+f13 right 12:24
+stickster We watch that and discuss things there all the time. 12:24
+f13 the only danger is that we'll wind up answering them on list and never getting to them on IRC (: 12:24
+notting stickster: but i don't think we've specifically advertised that as a means for pre-seeding the public chat 12:24
+stickster f13: But they're so much more googly there! 12:24
+stickster Or is it "googlier"? 12:24
+stickster I like the idea that the chats are done on our toes... are we sure that making this a scripted meeting is an improvement? 12:25
+glezos I think this could be done in parallel to meetings. 12:25
-!- v0idang3l [n=angel@] has quit [Client Quit] 12:26
+caillon stickster, it would have the benefit that we can answer everyone's questions in a more timely fashion 12:26
+caillon and thus make it less likely that we'll not answer two questions, as we are now. 12:26
+glezos That is, once every month the Board can accept questions and provide answers to them collectively and asynchronously a few days later. 12:26
-!- darthmarth37|Wk [] has quit [Remote closed the connection] 12:26
+stickster Well, you do have a point. But it's not "not answering" if those questions are posted to FAB as follow-up. 12:26
+f13 right 12:27
-!- Sonar_Guy [n=Baconz@fedora/sonarguy] has quit [Client Quit] 12:27
+f13 IRC gives you real time, posting to the list is not likely to be any less unscripted non-cohesive response generating 12:28
+f13 we don't meet in a shadowy room to make sure we're all reading from the same script when we reply to email 12:28
+f13 we aren't a hive mind 12:28
+stickster f13: True enough 12:28
+skvidal f13: yes we are 12:28
+skvidal f13: you've not yet joined 12:28
+notting f13: then what are we meeting in the shadowy room for? 12:28
+stickster skvidal: shh, we're quiet now precious. 12:28
+f13 skvidal may speak for himself, but we all speak for skvidal 12:28
+skvidal notting: and will someone please open a window to clear out all the smoke? 12:28
+stickster quaid: Why don't you post the two remaining questions that way, and maybe I can get notting or someone to open a pre-seed thread later this month? 12:29
* quaid posts 12:29
+notting more seriously, sending them ahead of time or after time to f-a-b makes sense. f-a-b discussions are less likely to come to actionable decision points, though 12:29
+quaid JKnife> quaid_moderator: Why Linux for Fedora and not, lets say *BSD 12:29
+quaid or minix3? 12:29
+quaid <viking_ice> Is the Desktop SIG a Gnome Desktop SIG or is that SIG 12:29
+quaid made up of members from other *DE SIG's 12:29
+notting JKnife: it's our body of expertise. not worth switching. 12:29
+stickster OK, cool, we'll look for them there. 12:29
+stickster quaid: Thanks for moderating for us! 12:30
+caillon viking_ice, members from e.g. the KDE SIG participate 12:30
+f13 JKnife: Fedora doesn't say "Linux" anywhere in its offerings, come up with a Fedora BSD spin and we'll talk 12:30
+stickster oops 12:30
+stickster I guess, so much for winding up. 12:30
+f13 well I take that back, I'm sure we say Linux many places 12:30
+f13 but it's called Fedora, not Fedora Linux 12:30
+quaid stickster: my pleasure, anytime 12:31
+glezos f13: would bootstrapping such a team/technology be realistic for a Google SoC project? 12:31
+f13 um. 12:31
+notting glezos: i... don't see the point? 12:31
+f13 yeah 12:31
+f13 I don't either. 12:31
+f13 what would it accomplish? 12:31
+caillon viking_ice, but doing the same work multiple times is not fun, and the desktop SIG focuses primarily on on DE, namely GNOME. 12:31
+glezos me neither, just taking the 'come up with a Fedora spin' a step further. :) 12:32
+stickster caillon: But to be fair, much applicable work is done in so as to enable other DEs fairly 12:32
+notting caillon: viking_ice: i would say that the original people who were interested in pushing forward the desktop came from a GNOME base of knowledge and experience, and it sort of becomes self-sustaining from there 12:32
* stickster overuses the word "fair," sorry. 12:32
+f13 stickster: fairy. 12:32
+stickster f13: queen! 12:33
+notting w.r.t. BSD, for example, i don't think it's fair to expect all packagers to suddenly have to maintain multiple builds and ports for different kernels. in fact, i can imagine the response from the X side of the house pretty well. 12:33
+caillon stickster, yes. the work done is specifically to make it easy for other frontends to plug-in. see NetworkManager, PackageKit, PolicyKit, etc. 12:33
-!- abadger1999 [n=abadger1@nat/redhat/x-ee683ae5a67c0307] has quit [Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer)] 12:33
+quaid <speaking out of turn> stickster: yes, that is probably the best point to make -- Fedora is a converged desktop more than a GNOME or KDE-preferring distro </speaking...> 12:33
+f13 notting: releng would have a pretty nasty response as well, as I"m sure QA would too 12:33
+stickster caillon: Exactly 12:34
+mdomsch and again, what's the point? 12:34
* stickster can't imagine having to deal with builds of his relatively insignificant package maintainer load for OS's with which he's not familiar. 12:34
+caillon it just so happens that the frontend that gets written first is (usually) the GNOME one 12:34
+mdomsch just because we could write something a dozen times doesn't mean we should 12:34
+stickster mdomsch: f13: Maybe the answer is, "Why not?" 12:34
+f13 stickster: because it costs real resources to do 12:35
+h\h time 12:35
+caillon Fedora: The Aristocrats version 12:35
+stickster f13: Sorry, I was unclear -- "Why not Linux?" 12:35
+f13 and in order to spend the resource, I'd like a ... 12:35
+f13 ah. 12:35
+stickster caillon: lulz. 12:35
+mdomsch if the people who want the work done pony up the resources, hey, who am I to stop them? 12:35
+stickster *magically* pony. 12:35
+mdomsch it's the secondary arch discussion all over again 12:35
+f13 mdomsch: I'm the guy to stop them. (being the one responsible for the buildsystem) 12:36
+f13 Fedora on BSD could be done, on its own, using the secondary mark 12:36
+notting mdomsch: well, same for long life span, or .... 12:36
* mdomsch points to OBS 12:36
+stickster True enough. 12:36
+mdomsch exactly 12:36
+notting mdomsch: i think it's the sort of thing where we'd want to see a reasonable commitment and demonstration of viability before we'd want to attach the Fedora name brand to it 12:37
+mdomsch until someone steps up to do it though, it's moot 12:37
+mdomsch notting, sure 12:37
* mdomsch deals with unrealistic requests daily 12:37
+stickster Which is often the right answer to "Why don't 'we' do <X/>?". 12:37
+f13 are we done here? my stomach is yelling loudly at me. 12:37
+quaid btw, I'll post the IRC log, but to do so we eventually need to close the meeting :) 12:37
+stickster OK, I think we've now beat two horses simultaneously to death. 12:38
-!- John5342 [n=john5342@fedora/John5342] has left #fedora-board-meeting [] 12:38
+stickster f13 will soon get low blood sugar and lash out violently :-) 12:38
+f13 mmmmm 12:38
+f13 glue 12:38
+stickster quaid: Thank you again for moderating for us. 12:38
+stickster Thank you to the community for the good questions and their kind attendance! 12:38
+quaid </meeting> 12:38

Generated by 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!