From Fedora Project Wiki
m (internal link cleaning)
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
| '''Task Name''' || '''Owner''' || '''Priority''' || '''Target Date''' || '''Status/Notes'''
 
| '''Task Name''' || '''Owner''' || '''Priority''' || '''Target Date''' || '''Status/Notes'''
 
|-
 
|-
| Recommending SD hardware for Fedora || JeremyKatz || 1 || Update on 9/12 || Microsoft has already done a lot of working figuring out which SD card will work best with their OS; we should leverage that work to figure out what SD we should be offering to G1G1 users as the Fedora add-on.
+
| Moving all packages from OLPC into F11 || GregDeK || 1 || Weekly update || Progress is being tracked at [[OLPC/Packages_for_F11]]
|-
 
| pyxcom/xulrunner issues || JeremyKatz / ChrisAillon || 1 || Update on 9/25 || In order to get the Browse activity to work properly natively to Fedora, we need to resolve the xulrunner fork in OLPC repos -- ChristopherAillon is trying to get those changes upstream, but is still on vacation.
 
|-
 
| Packaging Sugar activities || GregDekoenigsberg || 1 || Weekly update || We need to closely track to the packages listed on the [[http://www.sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap|Sugarlabs roadmap]] with the package requests that are tracked on the [[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList#Activities|Fedora wishlist page]].
 
|-
 
| Python performance issues between F7 and F9 || MarcoPesentiGritti || 1 || Update on 9/25 || Python in F9 is much slower, making Sugar performance painful -- gregdek is waiting on a note from Tomeu to forward to internal Python gurus.
 
|-
 
| Installation path || JimGettys || 2 || On Hold || What's involved in installation onto internal NAND?  What's involved to be able to use olpc-update?  What needs to be done to ensure wear levelling?  Deferring this question, since our current focus is not on installing to NAND, but to SD card.
 
|-
 
| Figuring out how to create small localized spins || SebastianDziallas, gettys|| 2 || On hold || How can we make small images by cutting out unnecessary language info, and make particular builds that are customized for particular languages? Sebastian and Jim continue to work on this.
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 25: Line 15:
 
| '''Task Name''' || '''Mentor''' || '''Priority''' || '''Date Completed''' || '''Details'''
 
| '''Task Name''' || '''Mentor''' || '''Priority''' || '''Date Completed''' || '''Details'''
 
|-
 
|-
| Recommending SD hardware for Fedora on XO || JeremyKatz || 1 || 9/12 || We will be recommending the SanDisk Extreme III.
+
| Fedora Live CD for Sugar || sdziallas || 1 || January 2009 || We'll be working on SoaS instead of having various efforts around. [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-spins/2009-February/000444.html] has more details.
 +
|-
 +
| Joining Fedora testers to OLPC Friends In Testing || MelChua || 1 || 18 December 2008 || OLPC continues to need help testing, and since we have The Seventy who tested Fedora on OLPC, we're going to try to leverage their help in building the FIT team.  Mel will put together a recruitment pitch, and gregdek will contact The Seventy.  Brian Pepple has volunteered to lead.
 +
|-
 +
| Getting NetworkManager 0.7 working properly in Sugar || erikos || 1 || 11 December 2008 || Since Sugar 0.82 assumes NM 0.6, and Fedora 10 carries NM 0.7, there is some remediation work that needs to be done here for Sugar+networking+Fedora 10 to work together smoothly.  erikos has gotten enough of this done that Sugar 0.82 basically works in F10.
 +
|-
 +
| Developer keys on G1G1 machines? || EdMcnierney || 1 || December 2008 || Default XO security policy dictates that users who get a Fedora SD card will need a developer key to boot from it.  We must document this clearly for users; when SD cards ship, they will have pretty graphics explaining exactly what must be done.  Karlie is actively working on docs for this.
 +
|-
 +
| Landing page content for SD key collateral || GregDeKoenigsberg || 1 || December 2008 || We need to have a landing page that tells users everything they need to know: common issues, how to get help, etc., etc.  Our landing URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XO
 +
|-
 +
| Fedora on XO QA plan || JamesLaska || 1 || December 2008 || Testing for F10 is complete.  Read the [[QA/TestPlans/Fedora10_On_XO|Master QA plan]] for more info.  We will continue to refine this plan for F11 and beyond.
 +
|-
 +
| pyxcom/xulrunner issues || JeremyKatz / ChrisAillon || 1 || Fixed, in rawhide as of 10/9/08 || DANGER.  This is critical path for Browse working in F10 Sugar, and still is not built.  caillon swears by all that is holy that it shall be done.
 +
|-
 +
| Recommending SD hardware for Fedora on XO || JeremyKatz || 1 || 9/12/08 || We will be recommending the SanDisk Extreme III.
 
|-
 
|-
| Bug tracker for Fedora on XO bugs || JeremkyKatz || 1 || 9/12 || Tracking bug set: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=461806&hide_resolved=1
+
| Bug tracker for Fedora on XO bugs || JeremkyKatz || 1 || 9/12/08 || Tracking bug set: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=461806&hide_resolved=1
 
|-
 
|-
| create weekly meeting page || GregDeKoenigsberg || 1 || 9/5 || Create a weekly meeting page to track open tasks and progress
+
| create weekly meeting page || GregDeKoenigsberg || 1 || 9/5/08 || Create a weekly meeting page to track open tasks and progress
 
|-
 
|-
| Bundlebuilder changes || MarcoPesentiGritti || 1 || 9/5 || Bundlebuilder changes are in.
+
| Bundlebuilder changes || MarcoPesentiGritti || 1 || 9/5/08 || Bundlebuilder changes are in.
 
|-
 
|-
| Establish a build system || gettys || 1|| 9/2 || Establish a system for building spins
+
| Establish a build system || gettys || 1|| 9/2/08 || Establish a system for building spins
 
|-
 
|-
| Bloat investigation|| gettys || 1 || 9/5 || Figure out where the worst bloat offenders are
+
| Bloat investigation|| gettys || 1 || 9/5/08 || Figure out where the worst bloat offenders are
 
|-
 
|-
| Start application discussion || gettys || 2 || 9/3 || Start discussion around what should be in an OLPC spin
+
| Start application discussion || gettys || 2 || 9/3/08 || Start discussion around what should be in an OLPC spin
 
|-
 
|-
| X packages needed || gettys || 3 || 9/4 || figure out which X packages are desirable
+
| X packages needed || gettys || 3 || 9/4/08 || figure out which X packages are desirable
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
----
 
----
 
[[Category:OLPC]]
 
[[Category:OLPC]]

Latest revision as of 14:53, 18 September 2016

Fedora OLPC tasks/agenda

Active (Assigned) Tasks

Task Name Owner Priority Target Date Status/Notes
Moving all packages from OLPC into F11 GregDeK 1 Weekly update Progress is being tracked at OLPC/Packages_for_F11

Completed Tasks

Task Name Mentor Priority Date Completed Details
Fedora Live CD for Sugar sdziallas 1 January 2009 We'll be working on SoaS instead of having various efforts around. [1] has more details.
Joining Fedora testers to OLPC Friends In Testing MelChua 1 18 December 2008 OLPC continues to need help testing, and since we have The Seventy who tested Fedora on OLPC, we're going to try to leverage their help in building the FIT team. Mel will put together a recruitment pitch, and gregdek will contact The Seventy. Brian Pepple has volunteered to lead.
Getting NetworkManager 0.7 working properly in Sugar erikos 1 11 December 2008 Since Sugar 0.82 assumes NM 0.6, and Fedora 10 carries NM 0.7, there is some remediation work that needs to be done here for Sugar+networking+Fedora 10 to work together smoothly. erikos has gotten enough of this done that Sugar 0.82 basically works in F10.
Developer keys on G1G1 machines? EdMcnierney 1 December 2008 Default XO security policy dictates that users who get a Fedora SD card will need a developer key to boot from it. We must document this clearly for users; when SD cards ship, they will have pretty graphics explaining exactly what must be done. Karlie is actively working on docs for this.
Landing page content for SD key collateral GregDeKoenigsberg 1 December 2008 We need to have a landing page that tells users everything they need to know: common issues, how to get help, etc., etc. Our landing URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XO
Fedora on XO QA plan JamesLaska 1 December 2008 Testing for F10 is complete. Read the Master QA plan for more info. We will continue to refine this plan for F11 and beyond.
pyxcom/xulrunner issues JeremyKatz / ChrisAillon 1 Fixed, in rawhide as of 10/9/08 DANGER. This is critical path for Browse working in F10 Sugar, and still is not built. caillon swears by all that is holy that it shall be done.
Recommending SD hardware for Fedora on XO JeremyKatz 1 9/12/08 We will be recommending the SanDisk Extreme III.
Bug tracker for Fedora on XO bugs JeremkyKatz 1 9/12/08 Tracking bug set: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=461806&hide_resolved=1
create weekly meeting page GregDeKoenigsberg 1 9/5/08 Create a weekly meeting page to track open tasks and progress
Bundlebuilder changes MarcoPesentiGritti 1 9/5/08 Bundlebuilder changes are in.
Establish a build system gettys 1 9/2/08 Establish a system for building spins
Bloat investigation gettys 1 9/5/08 Figure out where the worst bloat offenders are
Start application discussion gettys 2 9/3/08 Start discussion around what should be in an OLPC spin
X packages needed gettys 3 9/4/08 figure out which X packages are desirable