From Fedora Project Wiki

< PackagingDrafts

Revision as of 18:03, 13 October 2011 by Ctyler (talk | contribs) (Fixed up grammar.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)


Existing Guideline

Architecture Support

All Fedora packages must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Fedora packagers should make every effort to support all primary architectures.

Content, code which does not need to compile or build, and architecture independent code (noarch) are notable exceptions.

Proposal

Architecture Support

All Fedora packages must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture, except where the package is useful only on a secondary architecture (such as an architecture-specific boot utility, microcode loader, or hardware configuration tool). Fedora packagers should make every effort to support all primary architectures.

Content, code which does not need to compile or build, and architecture independent code (noarch) are notable exceptions.

Discussion

See Talk:PackagingDrafts/MustBuildOnPrimaryArchitecture for rationale and discussion.