Search results

== Usage cases/rationale == | Package || Bugzilla BZ || Status

= An offline package update/installation facility for Pirut = The problem with the current package management tools in Fedora is that they need a good and stable Internet con

...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc]) | fedora_mailing_list = test

...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc]) === What to test? ===

...hese cases, it makes no sense to do a python3- subpackage, since the whole package would need to be duplicated (e.g. python3-gdb). These packages should be bu * DONE: totem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192122

== What to test? == Today's installment of Fedora Test Day will focus on:

...Oct 20, 2009 || ALL DAY || [irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-test-day #fedora-test-day]) == What to Test? ==

17:07 <@wwoods> I was supposed to write a test-plan template for the wiki. ...of testplan layouts - a couple internal ones, looked at the IEEE official Test Plan stuff

| name = Fedora Test Days ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc])

== What to test? == '''WARNING:''' These are OLD test results, for the CURRENT test see the 2010 test page:[[Test_Day:2010-04-13_Nouveau]]

12:11 < dmalcolm> it's the test results that are the pain at the moment 12:13 < mether> why are the tools to test the distributed going to be in hosted.fedoraproject.org instead of in the d

| name = Fedora Test Days ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc])

| name = Fedora Test Days ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc])

== What to test? == Today's instalment of Fedora Test Day will focus on the ''radeon'' driver for ATI Radeon graphics cards.

...inux-non-ascii|''Non-ASCII characters found'' error messages appear during package update etc.|1502009}} ...e cause of this problem and intend to fix it with a future update to the {{package|selinux-policy}} packages.

...d normal disks (or with FW RAID turned off) shouldn't be affected. In most cases, you can use the UEFI boot menu as a workaround. Different systems (differe <li>First, make sure your libhif package version is the same as described above or newer:

...only affects virtual machines and cloud instances. In particularly serious cases, the delay can be such that timeouts kick in and the system fails to boot f ...are suffering from this issue. It can also be a viable workaround in some cases, though of course not all.

...Fedora versions. "When I see a package update submitted that just takes a package to the latest upstream release, I always question it in my head (and someti ...a way for users to manually tweak their sound settings for the inevitable cases in which the database lacked (or contained inaccurate) information on speci

Tuned contains few profiles for different use-cases. They can be set or changed by tuned-adm utility. Both utilities are part of tuned-utils package. They can be executed as

...lors for displays, printers, and scanners, through the gnome-color-manager package. Thanks to Richard Hughes from Red Hat for his involvement upstream and in * Enhanced streaming and buffering support in Totem. Totem's Movie Player and web browser plugins are now better at handling large str

...the bare package manager. Please be sure to read [[Upgrading Fedora using package manager]] for an overview of the entire process as well as the release-spec ...very special'''. Far beyond the general warning that upgrading with just a package manager is not recommended, the /usr move makes upgrading to Fedora 17 or l

| name = '''btrfs by default test week''' | image = [[File:test-days-banner.svg|300px|link=QA/Test Days]]

...g.cgi?id=441080 441080]||qpidc: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used, useless debuginfo package ...hat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449255 449255]||totem fails to play dvgrab output; totem 2.18.3-1.fc7 plays the same file