From Fedora Project Wiki

m (Mattdm moved page Talk:CloudCloud PRD to Talk:Cloud/Cloud PRD)
(suggestions from hguemar)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Should Pivotal Cloud Foundry be in scope for PaaS? --[[User:Stahnma|Stahnma]] ([[User talk:Stahnma|talk]]) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 
Should Pivotal Cloud Foundry be in scope for PaaS? --[[User:Stahnma|Stahnma]] ([[User talk:Stahnma|talk]]) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
---
 +
 +
 +
== Suggestions from [[User:hguemar|hguemar]] ==
 +
 +
=== Use cases ===
 +
 +
Drop
 +
* PaaS node images (until OpenShift or another PaaS comes back on Fedora repo)
 +
* Big data images (not much move)
 +
 +
Modify the following to include docker containers
 +
* Simple deployment
 +
 +
=== Features ===
 +
 +
Drop
 +
* Docker image (transferred to another WG)
 +
* Big data tools
 +
 +
=== Atomic Host ===
 +
 +
The PRD should reflect the Atomic Host importance in our strategy.

Revision as of 20:30, 1 June 2015

Should Pivotal Cloud Foundry be in scope for PaaS? --Stahnma (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

---


Suggestions from hguemar

Use cases

Drop

  • PaaS node images (until OpenShift or another PaaS comes back on Fedora repo)
  • Big data images (not much move)

Modify the following to include docker containers

  • Simple deployment

Features

Drop

  • Docker image (transferred to another WG)
  • Big data tools

Atomic Host

The PRD should reflect the Atomic Host importance in our strategy.