From Fedora Project Wiki

Revision as of 18:14, 3 June 2011 by Mmaslano (talk | contribs)

I understand it'll be a lot of work, but wouldn't this be an excellent moment to introduce grub2, which has btrfs support already, iirc? Wzzrd 05:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

I think we should be good to keep desktop integration in mind here too. It is no good to have filesystem features exposed in anaconda, and then have no UI in the installed system to deal with it. --mclasen 18:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Now would also probably be a good time to start setting up QA test cases. Jdulaney 008, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Not loosing functions, which worked with ext4

  • We must be able to cypher our disk or volume as is possible now. User:mmaslano 19:21, 3 June 2011 (GMT)
    • Don't remove initramfs, it's used for decyphering of data.User:mmaslano 20:11, 3 June 2011 (GMT)
  • Working with quota must be still possible. User:mmaslano 19:21, 3 June 2011 (GMT)
  • Ask anaconda guys, how would they handle it. Preferably, add easier change of fs in installer. User:mmaslano 19:21, 3 June 2011 (GMT)
  • fsck must worked. It should be tested for a longer period to see if it's really working. Probably good test suite would be nice. User:mmaslano 19:21, 3 June 2011 (GMT)

Stability of filesystem

All btrfs bugs should be reviewed and the important will be added into tracking bug for blockers of btrfs.

Candidates:

Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Features/F16BtrfsDefaultFs&oldid=240085"