Talk:Features/GNUstep

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
mjg59
 
mjg59
  
I think one issue is, that the majority think, that gnustep-base will fullfill the implementation of the GNUstep API.
+
I think one issue is, that the majority believe, that gnustep-base will fullfill the implementation of the GNUstep API.
 
In opposite, this package implements only the foundation frameworks which provides classes likes NSString or NSDictionary.  
 
In opposite, this package implements only the foundation frameworks which provides classes likes NSString or NSDictionary.  
 
This are non-GUI classes which will be required by other gnustep packages like gnustep-gui which will implements the
 
This are non-GUI classes which will be required by other gnustep packages like gnustep-gui which will implements the

Revision as of 16:07, 7 July 2010

Open Issues

Could the page clarify what the feature actually implements? The majority of the packages provided have been in Fedora since F10.

The release notes should also be cleared up somewhat - Gnustep isn't "the open source version of nextstep", it's "an open source implementation of nextstep".

mjg59

I think one issue is, that the majority believe, that gnustep-base will fullfill the implementation of the GNUstep API. In opposite, this package implements only the foundation frameworks which provides classes likes NSString or NSDictionary. This are non-GUI classes which will be required by other gnustep packages like gnustep-gui which will implements the classes of the AppKIT framework, which you need to create GUI applications on the base of GNUstep.

For the GNUstep core collection we need the following packages:

  • gnustep-make
  • gnustep-base
  • gnustep-gui
  • gnustep-back

On top of this package collection you can create addtionaly packages based on the GNUstep API.

s4504kr