From Fedora Project Wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14 May 2012
--[[User:Kay|Kay]] 14 May 2012


See [https://bugzilla.redhat.co/show_bug.cgi?id=801626 rhbz#801626].
See [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801626 rhbz#801626].


--[[User:jpokorny|jpokorny]] 27 July 2012
--[[User:jpokorny|jpokorny]] 27 July 2012
added to release notes at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_System_Daemons_Beat [[User:Immanetize|Immanetize]] ([[User talk:Immanetize|talk]]) 17:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:18, 26 October 2012

..."some of the newly written patches were incompatible with sources maintained by other distributors. A similar incompatibility could be noticed in the applications behaviour and their command line switches"...

Yet "User Experience" says "No major changes expected" - can both be true?

The "Release notes" section should contain release notes for Fedora - probably listing the incompatible changes.

--Mitr 14:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Question that is related but not directly relevant for the feature acceptance: is there any reason why this isn't integrated into util-linux?

--Lennart 15:48, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Please, please, please no more *-ng projects. It makes almost no sense. Just take over the package, nobody cares; and changing names causes nothing but trouble for no good reason. Or just merge it into util-linux, which makes the most sense of all options. It can share a lot off stuff, and we do not really need separate maintenance for such packages anyway.

--Kay 14 May 2012

See rhbz#801626.

--jpokorny 27 July 2012


added to release notes at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_System_Daemons_Beat Immanetize (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)