From Fedora Project Wiki

(Langpacks: new section)
(Langpacks)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
== Langpacks ==
 
== Langpacks ==
  
There's a notice in the Language-support groups that it's been (partly) obsoleted by yum-langpacks—shouldn't we add a section called Langpacks for this? I had to ask on #fedora-devel to figure out what to do for my package to be properly supported by yum-langpacks.
+
There's a notice in the Language-support groups that it's been (partly) obsoleted by yum-langpacks—shouldn't we add a section called Langpacks for this? I had to ask on #fedora-devel to figure out what to do for my package to be properly supported by yum-langpacks. [[User:Mso|Mso]] 11:32, 11 Feb 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:32, 11 February 2013

Name Change

I believe the name for this article is too verbose. "comps.xml" seems more appropriate, but I'm not an expert by any means on this. Thoughts? Dafrito 22:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

There's already a redirect from comps.xml back here and according to the page naming guidelines, the general rule appears to be that we should use longer more descriptive titles. --Alexlan 18:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Langpacks

There's a notice in the Language-support groups that it's been (partly) obsoleted by yum-langpacks—shouldn't we add a section called Langpacks for this? I had to ask on #fedora-devel to figure out what to do for my package to be properly supported by yum-langpacks. Mso 11:32, 11 Feb 2013 (UTC)