From Fedora Project Wiki
- jlaska 21:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC) - Workflows - I like that you are identifying and comparing the different workflows in each solution. Let's continue capturing how we are using the wiki now (e.g. creating a test, posting a test result, Adding a bug to a result, initiating a new test run, finding remaining untested cases, Submitting a test summary, etc...). I'm not sure of the best way to compare workflows ... I'd have to play around with different options. The important thing for now seems to be capturing them.
- jlaska 21:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC) - Features - Once we've identified as many workflows as we can, let's drill down and inspect the features of each tool that we'd use/need. I think this needs to be a different table/section from the workflows. However, your table example seems to work well for comparison purposes. Try to keep each feature short and simple. If it's too long, we might need to break it down into smaller parts. Maybe something like the following? Feel free to adjust as needed of course!
| Feature | fedoraproject.org/wiki | nitrate |
|---|---|---|
| License | ||
| Integration with FAS |  |
 |
| Supports anonymous user read-only access | |
|
| Supports anonymous user read-write access | |
|
| Data entry format | mediawiki markup | tinyMCE? |
| Test case re-use (write once, link anywhere) | |
Using test plans |
