Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 230: |
Line 230: |
|
| |
|
| If you have problems with any of the tests, report a bug to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] usually for the component [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=28&component=java-openjdk java-openjdk] or [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=28&component=java-11-openjdk java-11-openjdk] or [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=28&component=java-1.8.0-openjdk java-1.8.0-openjdk]. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC and we will help you. | | If you have problems with any of the tests, report a bug to [https://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] usually for the component [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=28&component=java-openjdk java-openjdk] or [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=28&component=java-11-openjdk java-11-openjdk] or [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=28&component=java-1.8.0-openjdk java-1.8.0-openjdk]. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC and we will help you. |
|
| |
| == Test Results ==
| |
| === Install ===
| |
| {|
| |
| ! User
| |
| ! Profile
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_java_install java install]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_java-devel_install java-devel install]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_java-openjdk_install java-openjdk install]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_java-11-openjdk_install java-11-openjdk install]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_java-1.8.0-openjdk_install java-1.8.0-openjdk install]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_java-9-openjdk_install java-9-openjdk install]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_icedtea-web_install icedtea-web install]
| |
| ! References
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:andrlos|andrlos]]
| |
| | f29-x64
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>{{bz|1633332}} java 1.8.0 configs missing in /etc/java</ref>{{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:nabooengineer|nabooengineer]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|warn}}<ref>I rolled back the initial VM snapshot each time to do a fresh install vs. installing each additive. Then installed all of them to test the alternatives switching.</ref>{{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|fail}}<ref>sudo dnf install java-9-openjdk
| |
| Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:00 ago on Tue 25 Sep 2018 11:43:45 PM EDT.
| |
| No match for argument: java-9-openjdk
| |
| Error: Unable to find a match
| |
| </ref>
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:spathare|spathare]]
| |
| | Fedora 29 Workstation x86_64
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:stooke|stooke]]
| |
| |
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>I found the different separators between the package names and java versions slightly confusing, and for a second thought it was downgrading. This was totally my carelessness, but I thought I'd admit to it.
| |
|
| |
| $ java --version
| |
| openjdk 11-ea 2018-09-25
| |
| OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11-ea+22)
| |
| OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11-ea+22, mixed mode, sharing)
| |
|
| |
| RPM install:
| |
|
| |
| Installing:
| |
| java-11-openjdk x86_64 1:11.0.ea.28-2.fc29 updates-testing 193 k
| |
|
| |
| All I saw was the "+22" and "-2" until I looked carefully. </ref>
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>Sorry, I just read the test case again, and this was expected behaviour. As a user, I would find it very confusing - if I dnf install java , then I would expect the java-devel package to be the same version.</ref>{{result|fail}}<ref>sudo dnf install java-devel offered to (and I let it) install
| |
| (1/3): java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.181.b15-0.fc29.x86_64.rpm 103 kB/s | 234 kB 00:02
| |
| (2/3): java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-1.8.0.181.b15-0.fc29.x86_64.rpm 651 kB/s | 9.8 MB 00:15
| |
| (3/3): java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless-1.8.0.181.b15-0.fc29.x86_64.rpm 875 kB/s | 32 MB 00:37
| |
|
| |
| I would expect JDK 11 !</ref>
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|warn}}<ref>JDK 11 was installed by default on my version of f29, so I got "already installed"</ref>
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:stooke|stooke]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>(already installed)</ref>
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>"Error: Unable to find a match"</ref>
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| === Multiple installs ===
| |
| {|
| |
| ! User
| |
| ! Profile
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-11-devel installs]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-devel installs]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-1.8.0-devel]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-11-devel and java-10-devel installs]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-11-devel and java-1.8.0-devel installs]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-10-devel and java-10-devel installs]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2018-09-26:java_8,_10_and_11_testday#Install_Only_JDK multiple java-11-devel and java-10-devel and java-1.8.0-devel installs]
| |
| ! References
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| === switch JRE/JDK ===
| |
| {|
| |
| ! User
| |
| ! Profile
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_Switching_JRE/JDK_install swtich JRE/JDK]
| |
| ! References
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:nabooengineer|nabooengineer]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>Awesome, just be aware that some familiarity with alternatives & java helps to do this test. The "How to test" instructions are a little nebulous, as such not as clean as the install "How to test".</ref>
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:spathare|spathare]]
| |
| | Fedora 29 Workstation x86_64
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:stooke|stooke]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>I think it might be confusing if java gets you 1.8, while javac gets you 11 - the mismatch should be flagged with a warning, at 'alternatives' time somehow</ref>
| |
| | <references/>
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| === crypto config ===
| |
| {|
| |
| ! User
| |
| ! Profile
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_Systemwide_crypto_policy system wide]
| |
| ! References
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:nabooengineer|nabooengineer]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>DEFAULT, LEGACY & FUTURE worked as expected.</ref>
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:spathare|spathare]]
| |
| | Fedora 29 Workstation x86_64
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:stooke|stooke]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| === Shenandoah ===
| |
| {|
| |
| ! User
| |
| ! Profile
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sumantrom/Draft/Testcase_Shenandoah GC testing]
| |
| ! References
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:nabooengineer|nabooengineer]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}<ref>Decreasing the VCPU count from 4 to 1 allows me to see the better performance of ShenandoahGC over default GC</ref>{{result|warn}}<ref>Shenandoah GC appears to be functionally working as expected. GC does seem smoother/quicker. However I don't really see a pause time impact, really need to do a performance comparison benchmark and on bare metal vs on a VM F29 install. Will require some time to setup a real test, unless we have a specific test case comparison. Do we have a specific comparison?</ref>
| |
| | <references/>
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
| === rpm/dnf ops ===
| |
| {|
| |
| ! User
| |
| ! Profile
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:Java_rpm_Testcase&redirect=yes java]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:Java-devel_rpm_Testcase&redirect=yes java-devel]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:Java-openjdk_rpm_Testcase&redirect=yes java-openjdk]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:Java-11-openjdk_rpm_Testcase&redirect=yes java-11-openjdk]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:Java-1.8.0-openjdk_rpm_Testcase&redirect=yes java-1.8.0-openjdk]
| |
| ! [http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:Icetea_web_rpm_Testcase&redirect=yes icedtea-web]
| |
| ! References
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:nabooengineer|nabooengineer]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
| |-
| |
| | [[User:stooke|stooke]]
| |
| | Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-29_Beta-1.5 + Updates
| |
| | {{result|fail}}<ref>"sudo dnf remove java" offered to remove all versions of java on my system, yet "sudo dnf remove java-devel" only offered to remove JDK 1.8.0. This is inconsistent.</ref>
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | {{result|pass}}{{result|pass}}
| |
| |
| |
| | {{result|pass}}
| |
| | <references/>
| |
|
| |
| |-
| |
| |}
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| [[Category: Fedora 29 Test Days]] | | [[Category: Fedora 29 Test Days]] |