From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Stuff I find more or less important == | == Stuff I find more or less important == | ||
* [[AFS in Fedora| | * [[User:Abo/AFS in Fedora|AFS in Fedora]] | ||
* FreeIPA | * FreeIPA | ||
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187211 | * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187211 | ||
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 | * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212 | ||
* Is the current system for signing packages and distributing keys sufficient? | * Is the current system for signing packages and distributing keys sufficient? | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 19 June 2009
Right, I should write something here!
My name is Alexander Boström. I work as a sysadmin at a U and I can write code in various languages as well, when the mood is right.
I have interest in helping with Fedora both for work (as upstream for RHEL) and personally. It's what I prefer to use on my own computers and I like the Fedora approach to free software.
Contact info
- Homepage: http://www.alexander.bostrom.net/
Please send any mail to abo at fedoraproject.org, but note that I've been using my abo at kth.se address in the RH bugzilla and mailing lists. You might also find my abo at stacken.kth.se and alexander at bostrom.net addresses here and there.
Stuff I find more or less important
- AFS in Fedora
- FreeIPA
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187211
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452212
- Is the current system for signing packages and distributing keys sufficient?