From Fedora Project Wiki
(split, close out two)
(update)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Status of fonts in category [[:category:In-progress fonts|In-progress fonts]], in order of age
Status of fonts in category [[:category:In-progress fonts|In-progress fonts]], in order of age, as of 2011-05-26.


{|
{|
Line 8: Line 8:
! Should do
! Should do
|-
|-
| [[Perizia fonts]]               || [[rhbug:457709|457709]] || 2008-08-04 || 2010-01-11 still waiting new upstream website ||
| [[Rufscript fonts]]             || [[rhbug:467507|467507]] || 2008-10-17 || 2011-05-08 preliminary review of Jared's new package ||
|-
|-
| [[Rufscript fonts]]            || [[rhbug:467507|467507]] || 2008-10-17 || as above, still waiting upstream ||
| [[Chisholm Rubbing fonts]]     || [[rhbug:486687|486687]] || 2009-02-20 || 2010-02-22 has been approved, but later SRPM provided || review latest SRPM
|-
| [[Chisholm Banana Peels fonts]] || [[rhbug:486680|486680]] || 2009-02-20 || 2009-07-15 CLOSED WONTFIX || Should be moved back to wishlist
|-
| [[M+ fonts]]                    ||                  ||            || 2009-10-14 categorised as in-progress, but no review request in wiki ||
|-
| [[Gdouros Akkadian fonts]]      || [[rhbug:532231|532231]] || 2009-10-31 || all complete || update wiki (done), close review bug
|-
| [[Gdouros Symbola]]      || [[rhbug:532819|532819]] || 2009-11-03 || cvs done, but no builds || update wiki (done), close review bug when built
|-
| [[TLOMT Sniglet fonts]]        || [[rhbug:536718|536718]] || 2009-11-10 || 2009-11-13 reviewed. nothing since || packager should be pinged
|-
| [[Paratype PT Sans fonts]]      || [[rhbug:556308|556308]] || 2010-01-17 || 2010-02-15 cvs done || in progress
|-
| [[Ubuntu title fonts]]          || [[rhbug:564466|564466]] || 2010-02-12 || awaiting review ||
|-
| [[GFS Göschen fonts]]          || [[rhbug:564557|564557]] || 2010-02-13 || reviewed, in progress ||
|}
|}


Line 43: Line 27:
|-
|-
| [[Breip fonts]]                || [[rhbug:485542|485542]] || 2009-02-13 || 2009-02-14 reviewed, needinfo || 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
| [[Breip fonts]]                || [[rhbug:485542|485542]] || 2009-02-13 || 2009-02-14 reviewed, needinfo || 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
|-
| [[Chisholm Banana Peels fonts]] || [[rhbug:486680|486680]] || 2009-02-20 || 2009-07-15 CLOSED WONTFIX || back on wishlist
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 17:18, 26 May 2011

Status of fonts in category In-progress fonts, in order of age, as of 2011-05-26.

Page Review request Requested Last activity Should do
Rufscript fonts 467507 2008-10-17 2011-05-08 preliminary review of Jared's new package
Chisholm Rubbing fonts 486687 2009-02-20 2010-02-22 has been approved, but later SRPM provided review latest SRPM

Old reviews

Font reviews that have definitely stalled are moved from above to here. Looking at old review requests in Bugzilla might show that an old spec file might be still on the original packager's web site, and that might prove to be a reasonable starting point for a new attempt.

Page Review request Requested Last activity Should do
Epigrafica fonts 484057 2009-02-04 2009-02-04 reviewed, needinfo. Second review started as 492900 on 2009-03-30 but closed dup, 2009-03-31 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
Breip fonts 485542 2009-02-13 2009-02-14 reviewed, needinfo 2010-02-17 Confirmed that original packager does not want to complete this (email).
Chisholm Banana Peels fonts 486680 2009-02-20 2009-07-15 CLOSED WONTFIX back on wishlist
Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Frixxon/Fonts_in_progress&oldid=238158"