From Fedora Project Wiki
Line 26: Line 26:
 
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release.  
 
<!-- A sentence or two summarizing what this change is and what it will do. This information is used for the overall changeset summary page for each release.  
 
Note that motivation for the change should be in the Motivation section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". -->
 
Note that motivation for the change should be in the Motivation section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". -->
There are `font(:lang=...)` auto-generated dependency for fonts packages and packages that requires particular languages to get things working has those dependencies to pull it in. but that pulls packages in randomly and doesn't necessarily provide better result. particuarly when they don't have any fonts installed for those languages.
+
There are `font(:lang=...)` auto-generated dependency for fonts packages. it is used as a dependency identifier to satisfy a certain language requirement. but this way didn't guarantee qualities because what fonts packages is going to be pulled in is unreliable.
  
 
So this proposes to replace it with langpacks instead, which has proper dependencies for fonts and improve the user experience around fonts with applications.
 
So this proposes to replace it with langpacks instead, which has proper dependencies for fonts and improve the user experience around fonts with applications.
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 
== Current status ==
 
== Current status ==
* Targeted release: [[Releases/31 | Fedora 31 ]]  
+
* Targeted release: [[Releases/32 | Fedora 32 ]]  
 
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line -->  {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}  
 
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line -->  {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}  
 
<!-- After the change proposal is accepted by FESCo, tracking bug is created in Bugzilla and linked to this page  
 
<!-- After the change proposal is accepted by FESCo, tracking bug is created in Bugzilla and linked to this page  
Line 61: Line 61:
  
 
== Detailed Description ==
 
== Detailed Description ==
The language based meta information about font dependency was introduced since Fedora 11. that was helpful to find out a font for missing glyphs through PackageKit and was useful for minority languages. but the given result by it wasn't much better under the certain condition.
+
The language based meta information about font dependency was introduced since Fedora 11. that was helpful to find out a font for missing glyphs through PackageKit and was useful for minority languages because we didn't have fonts packages for them so much. but the user experience wasn't that better under the certain condition.
  
Users can't predict what fonts will be installed. this may gives us worst result particularly when no fonts for the requested language is installed and/or is majority languages that has too many fonts such as English, because this logic doesn't ensure the quality of fonts nor preferred fonts we expect to get installed by default.
+
Users can't predict what fonts will be installed. this may gives us worst result particularly when no fonts for the requested language is installed and/or is majority languages that has too many fonts such as English, because this logic doesn't guarantee the quality of fonts nor preferred fonts we expect to get installed by default.
 
This random dependency sometimes introduces unexpected result too. it might be able to pulls packages in to dependencies from external repositories. this may particularly be a problem when composing ISOs.
 
This random dependency sometimes introduces unexpected result too. it might be able to pulls packages in to dependencies from external repositories. this may particularly be a problem when composing ISOs.
  
Line 102: Line 102:
 
== Scope ==
 
== Scope ==
 
* Proposal owners:
 
* Proposal owners:
 +
** Update fontpackages to drop `font(:lang=...)` dependency generator from script
 +
** Replace `font(:lang=...)` dependency with `langpacks-core-...` in packages
 +
** Update PackageKit to pull `langpacks-core-...` in instead of `font(:lang=...)`
 +
 
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
 
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
  

Revision as of 06:19, 17 December 2019


Font Dependencies to Langpacks

Summary

There are font(:lang=...) auto-generated dependency for fonts packages. it is used as a dependency identifier to satisfy a certain language requirement. but this way didn't guarantee qualities because what fonts packages is going to be pulled in is unreliable.

So this proposes to replace it with langpacks instead, which has proper dependencies for fonts and improve the user experience around fonts with applications.

Owner

  • Name: Akira TAGOH
  • Email: tagoh@redhat.com
  • Release notes owner:

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 32
  • Last updated: 2019-12-17
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

The language based meta information about font dependency was introduced since Fedora 11. that was helpful to find out a font for missing glyphs through PackageKit and was useful for minority languages because we didn't have fonts packages for them so much. but the user experience wasn't that better under the certain condition.

Users can't predict what fonts will be installed. this may gives us worst result particularly when no fonts for the requested language is installed and/or is majority languages that has too many fonts such as English, because this logic doesn't guarantee the quality of fonts nor preferred fonts we expect to get installed by default. This random dependency sometimes introduces unexpected result too. it might be able to pulls packages in to dependencies from external repositories. this may particularly be a problem when composing ISOs.

So this Changes proposal aims to improve the user experience around font dependencies by replacing it by Langpacks instead. Langpacks contains various dependencies to use for certain languages, including dependencies for default fonts. so it will resolves the above issues.


Benefit to Fedora

This proposal provides reliable, predictable, and consistencies in dependencies about fonts.

Scope

  • Proposal owners:
    • Update fontpackages to drop font(:lang=...) dependency generator from script
    • Replace font(:lang=...) dependency with langpacks-core-... in packages
    • Update PackageKit to pull langpacks-core-... in instead of font(:lang=...)


  • Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

Upgrade/compatibility impact

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

How To Test

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

User Experience

Users will see better quality of rendering on applications if they had font(:lang=...) dependency and fonts packages randomly has ever been installed.


Dependencies

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No
  • Blocks product? product

Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release Notes