|(24 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)|
The user base of Fedora has many aspects.
Many people who contribute to Fedora representative of only a small cross-section of this user base. Fedora contributors understand that, while they are valued and important as Fedora community members, they may not be representative of a very large class of users who may find free software serves their needs as well. By understanding the nature of this larger class we can make good decisions about how to make Fedora work well for others besides ourselves. |+|
The user base of Fedora has many aspects. a of . and of free software. of can to Fedorawell .
| || |
|−|The following sections describe the characteristics of this large class of users, and the Fedora Project will make process changes where appropriate to ensure we are meeting the needs of as many members of this class as possible. You may find yourself fitting into one or more of these categories, in which case, welcome to our user base! |+|
this class of , we are the .
| || |
|−|== Voluntary Linux consumer == |+|
Voluntary Linux consumer
| || |
|−|We expect that a large number of people are switching to a Linux operating system by choice. They may do so for any of a number of reasons, including: |+|
:-to of the we .
|−|* Stability |+|
|−|* Security |+|
|−|* Curiosity |+|
|−|* Recommendations from people they know |+|
|−|* Free of cost |+|
|−|* Liberal software licensing |+|
|−|* Availability of high- quality software |+|
|−|* Free and open source ideals |+|
|−|* Desire to join a community |+|
|−|The processes of our community in producing a Fedora release, including the way we conduct its lifecycle, should not disappoint people against these expectations. |+|
| || |
Computer-friendly non-hacker == |+|
| || |
|−|Our community is made up of people, by and large , who are very tech savvy. The longer people have been involved in the Fedora community, typically the more expertise they accrue on Linux and specifically Fedora . However, our user base does not necessarily share this level of expertise. |+|
of large who . the , Fedora , .
| || |
|−|Users can be expected to be comfortable with installing an operating system, which means they have skills and knowledge that allows them to perform simple tasks including: |+|
to , and them
|−|* Locate and identify system components |+|
|−|* Download and save files |+|
|−|* Locate existing software to write optical or USB media |+|
|−|* Boot their system to alternative optical or USB media |+|
|−|* Follow instructions and prompts |+|
| || |
|−|Users cannot be expected to have certain skills and knowledge that many Fedora contributors have, including: |+|
Fedora'. the . , to to .
|−|* Understand operating system internals |+|
|−|* Know how programs and libraries are related or interact |+|
|−|* Evaluate new releases of existing software without context |+|
|−|* Mitigate unexpected changes in existing software |+|
|−|* Debug software crashes |+|
|−|* Diagnose system hardware problems |+|
|−|This does ' 'not'' mean that users are incapable of learning these skills. In fact, part of the process of becoming a collaborator and contributor is acquiring them. However, we cannot assume that a user already possesses these skills. We assume the software we propagate to users has no context to them other than they may use it. |+|
| || |
|−|== Likely collaborator == |+|
| || |
|−|== General productivity user == |+|
Our contributors are numbered among this user base. This class is not a statement of our present Project membership, but is rather a goal we are instituting for the Fedora distribution in the future.
Fedora contributors understand that they may not be representative of a very large class of users who may find free software serves their needs as well. By setting the bounds of this larger class, we can make good decisions about how to make Fedora work well for as many people as possible, including ourselves.
For example, package maintainers who contribute actively and regularly to Fedora are more than just computer-friendly. A package maintainer has a high level of technical skill beyond that of the general user base, she is not only likely but in fact a frequent collaborator, and while she may use her systems for general productivity use, she also uses them for specific technical domain work.
Another example of a different kind of contributor is someone on Fedora's marketing team. This person might much more closely resemble the baseline characteristics above. He may not have a high level of technical skill, and uses general productivity tools to complete his personal work in addition to Fedora specific tasks, although he is a frequent collaborator.
By tailoring our processes to appeal to this wide superset of users, we can ensure Fedora's ongoing relevance and appeal, and thereby encourage more people to become interested in free software and participate in the Fedora Project.