From Fedora Project Wiki

(Add comment: new section)
(cu@clt2020)
 
Line 45: Line 45:
 
--[[User:Vater|Vater]] ([[User talk:Vater|talk]]) 23:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Vater|Vater]] ([[User talk:Vater|talk]]) 23:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
  
 +
<!--
 
== Add comment ==
 
== Add comment ==
 +
-->----
  
 
The Page naming section of the [[Help:Wiki_structure|structure docs]] says not use nesting anymore. Those rules are not enforced but a category "Flock/2019" looks wired.
 
The Page naming section of the [[Help:Wiki_structure|structure docs]] says not use nesting anymore. Those rules are not enforced but a category "Flock/2019" looks wired.
Line 52: Line 54:
  
 
--[[User:Fab|Fab]] ([[User talk:Fab|talk]]) 09:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Fab|Fab]] ([[User talk:Fab|talk]]) 09:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
it does not look wired to me. but … anyway. to be clear: i disagree with this (no) nested pages policy. (the mediawiki features for organizing content are not used and i think these are useful (for users of this wiki).) but … it is a policy! (thanks for bringing me to this page.) sorry for "disorganizing". thanks for your effort to fix that (my mistake). (maybe i am refreshing the discussion from 10 years ago somehow and getting a lot of "friends" soon. :-D)
 +
 +
thanks!
 +
 +
--[[User:Vater|Vater]] ([[User talk:Vater|talk]]) 12:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:27, 24 March 2019

User pages

Please move all of the content from FabianAffolter to User:Fab and redirect the page appropriately as per Fedora wiki guidelines. --Ian Weller 22:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

why you are moving sub pages (to stand alone pages)

hey!

Fab moved page Chaos Communication Congress/2017 to Chaos Communication Congress 2017 and stuff like that is not clear for me.

(btw: one day before (sunday 2019-03-17) i was directly on the other side of the wall the fedora flag was pinned (at the Chemnitzer Linuxtage/2019).

nice to see activities on the wiki

--Vater (talk) 06:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


The whole subpage thing is a left-over from the migration from moinmoin to mediawiki. It's still possible to use it but nowadays most pages are miss-placed and already belong to a category.

--Fab (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


no. i was doing it that (sub page) way. i thought that is the best way. (are there other guidelines for that?)

btw: i also created the categories that way. and the category Category:Flock/2017 (a category for all the pages of the flock 2017 event) was (sub) categorized as one of the Category:events 2017.

:-/

now you created a (circle) problem (by accident).

Category:Flock 2017 →‎ Category:Flock/2017 →‎ Category:Flock 2017
Category:Flock/2017 →‎ Category:Flock 2017 →‎ Category:Flock/2017

you can see this at Special:DoubleRedirects.

would you like to roll back all your "moinmoin" changes?

--Vater (talk) 23:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


The Page naming section of the structure docs says not use nesting anymore. Those rules are not enforced but a category "Flock/2019" looks wired.

Thanks for the hint about the redirect issue.

--Fab (talk) 09:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)


it does not look wired to me. but … anyway. to be clear: i disagree with this (no) nested pages policy. (the mediawiki features for organizing content are not used and i think these are useful (for users of this wiki).) but … it is a policy! (thanks for bringing me to this page.) sorry for "disorganizing". thanks for your effort to fix that (my mistake). (maybe i am refreshing the discussion from 10 years ago somehow and getting a lot of "friends" soon. :-D)

thanks!

--Vater (talk) 12:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)