User talk:Pfrields

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Name suggestions for Fedora 14: new section)
(Name suggestions for Fedora 14: reply)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
[[User:Raphael|Raphael]] 19:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 
[[User:Raphael|Raphael]] 19:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
: That's correct, Raphael.  The [[guidelines for release names]], as linked from the name suggestions page, describe the process.  The Board decides on a shorter list and passes that to Red Hat Legal for clearance for the voting ballot. --[[User:Pfrields|pfrields]] 16:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: Dear Paul,
 +
 +
:: thanks for your reply. I must have been blind that I did not notice the concerning paragraph. Shame on me! :) By the way, could you please verify my edit at [[guidelines for release names]]? The link to the voting page seemed to be at the wrong place.
 +
 +
:: Best regards
 +
 +
:: [[User:Raphael|Raphael]] 08:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:23, 9 May 2010

[edit] Name suggestions for Fedora 14

Hi Paul,

I wonder why some name suggestions (e.g. ‘Alfvén’ or ‘Lausanna’) that got a ‘initial approve’ were not approved by the board. Did the people from the board select their six prefered names for the ballot?

Best regards

Raphael 19:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

That's correct, Raphael. The guidelines for release names, as linked from the name suggestions page, describe the process. The Board decides on a shorter list and passes that to Red Hat Legal for clearance for the voting ballot. --pfrields 16:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Dear Paul,
thanks for your reply. I must have been blind that I did not notice the concerning paragraph. Shame on me! :) By the way, could you please verify my edit at guidelines for release names? The link to the voting page seemed to be at the wrong place.
Best regards
Raphael 08:23, 9 May 2010 (UTC)