From Fedora Project Wiki

  • This will make it more reasonable for users to install a package $foo for a given Python implementation $impl: ...age is sometimes built in the corresponding python-foo (which provides the package $foo for python2). When reporting bugs against the python3 implementation o
    7 KB (1,068 words) - 14:01, 28 March 2013
  • ...going to switch into regression bug fix mode in January. I've performed a test mass rebuild == How To Test ==
    3 KB (439 words) - 19:06, 13 February 2012
  • ...000545.html</ref> the list that "If you're the maintainer of a cmake-based package, and use the %cmake macro, be aware I just implemented a change in rawhide ...nuary/000547.html</ref> that "The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current release (1.41.0) in rawhide for F13. More info<ref>https://f
    22 KB (3,123 words) - 09:51, 19 January 2010
  • * Not getting timely feedback needed from bug assignee (package maintainer) ...gaps--many times this works, but it is incredibly inefficient without the package maintainer present.
    10 KB (1,638 words) - 19:01, 24 November 2010
  • Update of Go (golang package) to the upcoming version 1.22 in Fedora 40. ...ated to the build infrastructure and is distinct from changing the default package manager in Fedora.
    27 KB (3,603 words) - 09:17, 29 April 2024
  • ...As one example, JRuby outperforms C Ruby in nearly all benchmarks, in some cases as much as 4x faster [http://www.slideshare.net/CharlesNutter/euruko-2012-j ...r use in Java packages, handle many other tasks necessary to create a Java package. The door is wide open now to bring the Java ecosystem to Fedora.
    10 KB (1,656 words) - 07:09, 14 August 2013
  • ...as possible, allowing for local users or products to override this base in cases they need to do so. ===[[Changes/Local Test Cloud | Local Test Cloud]]===
    14 KB (2,006 words) - 15:42, 28 October 2015
  • 12:07 <@wwoods> and there will be mail to fedora-test-list at least.. 3 days in advance (Monday) - is that OK? 12:23 <@wwoods> is it a -testing package, or a live one?
    34 KB (5,520 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • === Test Days === There was no Test Day last week, as we are deep in the Fedora 11 final release run-up.
    39 KB (5,887 words) - 15:36, 25 May 2009
  • | name = Fedora Test Days ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc])
    57 KB (8,888 words) - 21:40, 19 September 2016
  • ...mes provide public lobbies and using those will normally be fine. In other cases it might be necessary to get a co-sponsor for a session that has a static I ...number of particpants, ending when first human team member is defeated. A test or scratch build will be needed for F12 or F11 users.)
    18 KB (3,102 words) - 12:43, 27 July 2010
  • When we compile the python3 package on Fedora (prior to this change), we create the libpython3.?.so shared libr ...e are legitimate reasons to link an application to libpython and for those cases libpython should be provided so applications that embed Python can continue
    28 KB (3,454 words) - 13:31, 15 November 2019
  • ...h FLOSS goodness from Guillermo Gomez, this week on the audio manipulation package, SOX. Read on! The Emacs packaging guidelines were updated to handle cases where a
    45 KB (6,665 words) - 14:59, 24 March 2011
  • ...Assistant provides an easy method for developers to start new projects via package sets by language (currently C, Java, and Python). A new project can take ad ...arted with templates and samples, code with the appropriate toolchain, and package and distribute your creations.''
    22 KB (3,020 words) - 11:38, 11 April 2013
  • ...problems and suggests resolutions for them. The ''setroubleshoot-server'' package was explained[16] by John to address the needs of those running headless s ...t coupled such that stopping one stopped others, and that for the specific cases of ''auditd'', ''mcstrans'', ''restorecond'' and ''setroubleshoot'' mention
    30 KB (4,297 words) - 10:59, 14 April 2009
  • == Package Licensing Guidelines == ...nsing Guidelines] which describe, in detail, how to note the license of a package in the RPM Spec file.
    86 KB (9,472 words) - 02:34, 19 May 2023
  • ...s after items in the rebuild line are how many other applications use that package. A high count means that it's a good candidate for flatpak-common in the fu ! !! Package !! Flathub ID !! # Reviews !! Avg. Review !! In progress?
    338 KB (50,858 words) - 15:39, 5 March 2021
  • ...g.cgi?id=441080 441080]||qpidc: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used, useless debuginfo package .../bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245387 245387]||broken URL in pam_abl package description
    994 KB (150,950 words) - 23:19, 29 December 2012