From Fedora Project Wiki
< BugZappers | Meetings
m (typo correction "irc transcri" = "irc transscript") |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* adamw will arrange and coordinate the first bug triage day | * adamw will arrange and coordinate the first bug triage day | ||
== IRC | == IRC Transcript == | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- id="t07:01" | |- id="t07:01" |
Revision as of 16:41, 3 March 2009
Bug Triage Meeting :: 2009-02-24
Attendees
- comphappy
- poelcat
- tk009
- John5342
- mcepl
- bigdufstuff
- adamw
- beland
Meeting Summary & Action Items
- We are officially done setting goals for Fedora 11
- Goal will be triaging bugs for key components
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/components
- For Fedora 12 maybe we can create goals that are more measurable
- mcepl will create queries and RSS feeds for key components to be triaged
- comphappy will:
- have metrics reporting working by this weekend
- merge greasemonkey script created by mcepl to create triager signature into main Fedora triage greasemonkey script
- make sure download link for greasemonkey script is working and accessible
- adamw will arrange and coordinate the first bug triage day
IRC Transcript
Tk009_afk | Hello, who's here? :) | 07:01 |
---|---|---|
beland | Greetings. 8) | 07:01 |
John5342 | hi all | 07:01 |
Tk009_afk | Hello | 07:01 |
Tk009_afk | Feeling better john? | 07:02 |
John5342 | still rather drugged up but back home now | 07:02 |
John5342 | so tons better | 07:02 |
Tk009_afk | Well that is progress | 07:02 |
Tk009_afk | Looks like just us | 07:03 |
John5342 | dont seem to have many of us this week | 07:04 |
Tk009_afk | Hello big | 07:04 |
bigdufstuff | hi | 07:04 |
* poelcat here | 07:04 | |
poelcat | mcepl: jds2001 ping | 07:05 |
Tk009_afk | None of the people we need are here adamw, iarlyy, comphappy and mcelp | 07:05 |
mcepl | pong | 07:05 |
poelcat | who is leading the meeting? | 07:05 |
Tk009_afk | I am I think | 07:05 |
poelcat | Tk009_afk: thanks for sending the reminder :) | 07:05 |
poelcat | okay, go for it | 07:05 |
Tk009_afk | :) | 07:06 |
mcepl | I thought so ... :) | 07:06 |
Tk009_afk | I didn't have much on the agenda | 07:06 |
poelcat | do we have predefiend urls/queries for the key components? | 07:07 |
poelcat | and rss feeds too | 07:07 |
John5342 | we all know we dont need a big agenda to fill an hour :) | 07:07 |
Tk009_afk | The signature script and bug triage days | 07:07 |
mcepl | and mentoring | 07:07 |
* poelcat noted from reading last week's minutes we still seem unable to arrive at hard goals for F11 | 07:08 | |
poelcat | so maybe they are as hard as they are going to get | 07:08 |
Tk009_afk | Sorry I am on my blackberry my typing is a bit slow if someone wants to take the lead | 07:08 |
beland | and goals | 07:08 |
Tk009_afk | Did you have something to add on the goal | 07:09 |
poelcat | ideally we would pick something that is measurable so we can tell if we meet our goal | 07:09 |
poelcat | but i think we have tried long enough that it is time to move on | 07:09 |
poelcat | maybe we'll have a better idea for F12 | 07:10 |
poelcat | and learn something from what we do for F11 | 07:10 |
poelcat | so anyone opposed to saying we are done trying to set goals for F11 ? | 07:10 |
beland | Well, I was wondering what to put on the wiki page... | 07:10 |
beland | It sounded like "try to triage bugs as they come in" was not sustainable. | 07:10 |
poelcat | beland: historically it has not | 07:11 |
* poelcat waits 60 more seconds, then moving on | 07:11 | |
mcepl | poelcat: just jinging in with those queries and RSS feeds -- I will make sure it happens. | 07:12 |
poelcat | mcepl: excellent! | 07:12 |
* poelcat was thinking one to capture all components and then individual ones for each component | 07:12 | |
Tk009_afk | I think we have done what we can on goals. After 5 weeks maybe we have to go with what we have | 07:13 |
beland | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/FindingBugs has queries, only for all components in a given release. | 07:13 |
beland | What have you come up with so far? | 07:13 |
mcepl | poelcat: meaning, that components on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/ActiveTriagers should have query and RSS feed to such query? | 07:13 |
poelcat | yes | 07:13 |
poelcat | so when someone new shows up we can just say "here start with the bugs in this URL" | 07:13 |
mcepl | or https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/components ? | 07:13 |
mcepl | "yes" is not a good answer for "either ... or ..." question ... | 07:14 |
poelcat | mcepl: you are correct, the second one | 07:14 |
poelcat | mcepl: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/components | 07:14 |
poelcat | i forgot we made that the canonical location | 07:14 |
poelcat | we should probably say something about Fedora 11 at the top of that page | 07:15 |
* poelcat will do it unless there is a volunteer | 07:15 | |
beland | As a motivational and organizational technique, I think it would be helpful to have a table that simply lists the number of NEW bugs for each component. | 07:15 |
poelcat | next topic... signature script | 07:15 |
poelcat | beland: great idea... does anyone know how to generate a table like that automatically? | 07:16 |
poelcat | maybe tweaking one of the reports like this one? http://tinyurl.com/4cavl2 | 07:16 |
beland | (Or maybe only each "key" component as listed at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/components) | 07:16 |
Tk009_afk | Comphappy is working on that I believe | 07:16 |
Tk009_afk | I don't have the link on hand | 07:17 |
poelcat | Tk009_afk: when i last saw it he was listing all components | 07:17 |
poelcat | i saw mail that someone updated the greasemonkey script to add the signature | 07:17 |
beland | If per-component is the best way to organize things, a reasonable goal would be to zero out the number of NEW bugs in each component, cycling through them one by one. | 07:18 |
comphappy | tk009_afk, I am, but it is taking a while. | 07:18 |
poelcat | did this get merged into the git repo that comphappy was originally working from? | 07:18 |
poelcat | comphappy: do we have an ETC ? | 07:18 |
--- Log closed Tue Feb 24 07:18:48 2009 | ||
--- Log opened Tue Feb 24 07:19:00 2009 | ||
-!- Irssi: #fedora-meeting: Total of 141 nicks [1 ops, 0 halfops, 0 voices, 140 normal] | 07:19 | |
-!- Irssi: Join to #fedora-meeting was synced in 21 secs | 07:19 | |
mcepl | beland: sure, that's what I do for my xorg+firefox bugs, but it leads even more to my model of "bugzappers as stewards of particular componetns" rather than "horde running through bugzilla looking for a mischief" | 07:19 |
Tk009_afk | That is a idea that would work with bug triage days where we are all here | 07:20 |
poelcat_ | comphappy: do you have an estimate as to when the metrics site will be ready? | 07:20 |
beland | People should also be able to self-start just by looking at the wiki, and if there's a particular place people are encouraged to start, that's a little less intimidating than "There are 7,000 NEW bugs. Good luck" | 07:21 |
beland | I see that most people on the active triagers list haven't actually chosen a component. | 07:22 |
comphappy | poelcat_: I dont see why it would not be up by the end of the week, but it will take some time to generate useful data | 07:22 |
Tk009_afk | Our goal is bugs on the component list about 100 new bugs a day | 07:22 |
comphappy | BZ cannot give me historical data on # of bugs of different status | 07:22 |
beland | If you are only looking at "how many bugs are in the queue at the end of the week" vs. "how many bugs have gone through the queue all week", bugzilla reports will do, and I'm happy with that. | 07:23 |
beland | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/report.cgi?x_axis_field=bug_severity&y_axis_field=component&z_axis_field=&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=Fedora&product=Fedora&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&emailtype1=su | 07:23 |
beland | bstring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&format=table&action=wrap&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= | 07:23 |
buggbot | <http://tinyurl.com/b7ptrp> (at bugzilla.redhat.com) | 07:23 |
beland | lists NEW counts for all of the components. | 07:23 |
poelcat_ | what topic are we discussing right now? | 07:23 |
beland | Oops, that was more than a mouthful. | 07:23 |
comphappy | beland: that does not show history, which is what I am trying to do | 07:24 |
* poelcat_ notes we have about three going on | 07:24 | |
beland | Right. | 07:24 |
beland | But if it's taking a long time and is a lot of work, we can use reports in the meantime. | 07:24 |
Tk009_afk | I thought we were on goals still | 07:24 |
beland | Well, it's worthwhile to figure out how we want to measure our progress toward meeting goals. | 07:25 |
beland | It sounds like there were some fuzzy goals decided on at previous meetings? | 07:25 |
Tk009_afk | Many meetings | 07:25 |
Tk009_afk | Can't force people to do what they don't want to | 07:26 |
poelcat_ | beland: we haven't been able to arrive at anything concrete so in the interest of not spending any more time I motioned to move on (early in the meeting) | 07:26 |
* poelcat_ thinks six weeks is enough time to try :) | 07:27 | |
Tk009_afk | Agreed | 07:27 |
poelcat_ | and discussion can continue on the list, but hasn't | 07:27 |
beland | Well, what do you think of the goal of zeroing out the queue for each component on a rotating basis? | 07:27 |
Tk009_afk | I did try | 07:27 |
beland | I'd like to try doing some triage, and it would be nice to have something concrete to work on. | 07:27 |
poelcat_ | Tk009_afk: yes, thanks for starting the thread | 07:28 |
comphappy | I had thought that we had agreed to stabalized NEW count for our core components? | 07:28 |
Tk009_afk | We have | 07:28 |
poelcat_ | comphappy: that is the high level goal, how will we know if we have succeeded? | 07:28 |
Tk009_afk | That is the goal we set and voted on | 07:28 |
beland | OK, that's a good goal... | 07:30 |
beland | So for tracking purposes, why don't I use Bugzilla reports to get NEW numbers for each listed component, and post that on the /components page. | 07:31 |
poelcat_ | Tk009_afk: you are correct, i should not have said we don't have something concrete... we do, i was just hoping we could better measure it | 07:31 |
beland | We can turn the /Goals page into a redirect. | 07:31 |
* poelcat_ is trying to move the meeting forward, but we are 30 minutes in and still on this topic | 07:31 | |
beland | We can tell if we've met the goal by checking the report against the numbers stored in the wiki. | 07:32 |
poelcat_ | beland: would you be willing to start a mail thread on fedora-test-list ? | 07:32 |
* poelcat_ promises to respond there | 07:32 | |
beland | Why? | 07:32 |
John5342 | beland: so we can move onto next topic | 07:33 |
beland | Well, I'll do what I proposed and send mail about it, unless there are objections | 07:33 |
poelcat_ | beland: sounds good, thanks | 07:34 |
poelcat_ | what is the status of the greasemonkey script for adding the signature and is it in the git repo? | 07:34 |
poelcat_ | anyone? | 07:35 |
mcepl | it should be | 07:36 |
mcepl | it was working for me and somebody at #fedora-bugzappers but not 100% sure now | 07:37 |
poelcat_ | mcepl: what is the git url so we can put it in the notes? | 07:37 |
mcepl | http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/scripts/greasemonkey/add_bugzappers_signature.user.js | 07:37 |
poelcat_ | :) | 07:37 |
poelcat_ | mcepl: should it be merged into the main fedora greasemonkey script that comphappy orginally worked on? | 07:38 |
poelcat_ | seems strange to have two | 07:38 |
adamw | morning. sorry, guys | 07:38 |
poelcat_ | adamw: hi | 07:39 |
mcepl | my stuff is at http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=mcepl/public_git/greasemonkey.git;a=summary | 07:39 |
mcepl | poelcat_: I thought comphappy was promising to sync my repo with the official greasemonkey one. Don't know what's the status | 07:39 |
poelcat_ | i really think we need one canonical location to send people to | 07:39 |
poelcat_ | comphappy: ? | 07:39 |
comphappy | we are going to have gm as an rpm package if I can get the stupid mozillia profiles to cooperate | 07:40 |
comphappy | and then the scripts will be shipped as a package that people update | 07:40 |
poelcat_ | comphappy: what is the interim plan? | 07:41 |
comphappy | I can sync it, but I need to know when there is a change, as it is not automatic | 07:41 |
poelcat_ | couldn't we just have people refresh from git for now? | 07:41 |
adamw | please don't make people learn how to work git just to download a script for triaging | 07:42 |
adamw | we're working with volunteer bug triagers here, not developers | 07:42 |
poelcat_ | adamw: it's only two commands | 07:42 |
mcepl | poelcat_: I think I can work a little bit more hard on my git-foo and push just scripts which are of interest to Fedora folks. Not sure whether it is possible | 07:42 |
adamw | true, but...uh. | 07:42 |
poelcat_ | adamw: well, maybe you have a point | 07:42 |
comphappy | peolcat: not really, when you think about it most of them do not have any git tools installed | 07:43 |
poelcat_ | i'm just trying to say that we need one place to point people all the time | 07:43 |
mcepl | the problem is that I have different access bits than real Fedora volunteers and it is pretty complicated for me to pretend I am not a RH employee to develop the scripts. | 07:43 |
John5342 | but you dont need to install git to install from git repo. just a link to gitweb | 07:43 |
mcepl | and so I try to have always plain URL just with Javascript file available (see http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/scripts/greasemonkey/add_bugzappers_signature.user.js) | 07:43 |
poelcat_ | we should have a siple place for people to get one fedora gm script | 07:44 |
mcepl | but it is my understanding of the world, which needs to be fixed for Fedora volunteers | 07:44 |
comphappy | I think I linked to the link in trac but I am not sure it ended up working | 07:44 |
mcepl | and I don't mind if (after testing etc.) my scripts will be incldued into one overall Fedora scripts | 07:44 |
poelcat_ | comphappy: mcepl so what is our go forward plan? :) | 07:47 |
comphappy | I will sync the repo, and make sure our download link is working | 07:47 |
comphappy | I have a lot on my plate today, so it will be this evening before I get to it | 07:48 |
mcepl | and I will help with any bugs which show up | 07:48 |
poelcat_ | sounds great :) | 07:49 |
poelcat_ | next topic... triage days | 07:49 |
poelcat_ | where are we at with them ? | 07:50 |
adamw | need to start having them | 07:50 |
adamw | preferably later | 07:50 |
adamw | :P | 07:50 |
adamw | (in the day) | 07:50 |
poelcat_ | has someone volunteered to lead or coordinate them? | 07:50 |
John5342 | well i know qa is doing something similar with testing. wonder if we can organise something similar with triage. | 07:51 |
adamw | i don't think so. i'd do it if no one else wants to, although it doesn't have to be the same person each work, and it doesn't necessarily need that much 'leadership' | 07:51 |
adamw | yeah, there are weekly test days, it's working quite well lately | 07:51 |
adamw | s/work/week/ | 07:52 |
John5342 | i can help but am already fully booked till at least middle of april | 07:52 |
adamw | the other thing is to decide what exactly to do in them | 07:53 |
poelcat_ | adamw: lead away | 07:53 |
mcepl | just get some component and get rid of bug triage it? | 07:53 |
comphappy | I think that we are finding the busy people are all in bugzappers... | 07:53 |
adamw | i liked comphappy's idea about using them to train people | 07:53 |
John5342 | certainly triage day can be both productive _and_ educational | 07:54 |
adamw | but if everyone generally agrees it's a good idea and promises to try and show up :), i can start putting it together | 07:54 |
mcepl | yeah, but still my offer for mentorees stand ... if there is somebody who is serious and preferably somewhere around desktop components, I will gladly hold his hands. I have currently only one fcami and I think I can do more. | 07:54 |
John5342 | as for tips for how to make it work we might be able to talk to the people handling qa. | 07:54 |
adamw | mcepl: noted. you could maybe mail that guy who mailed the list recently? | 07:55 |
mcepl | Was it the one I replied to? | 07:56 |
comphappy | before the meeting ends, Is this what we want to monitor our goal? http://tinyurl.com/ccegmg note it is missing a few comp, I wanted to make something before the meeting ended | 07:56 |
adamw | mcepl: no...Lalit Dhiri, topic "BugZappers" | 07:56 |
adamw | comphappy: we'd want it as a graph with X as time and Y as quantity and New and Assigned as lines, I think | 07:57 |
beland | comphappy: I think it's missing a few components, but you've got the idea. | 07:57 |
adamw | object: make the lines flat or down | 07:57 |
mcepl | adamw: you mean http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/67991 ? | 07:57 |
adamw | mcepl: yup | 07:58 |
comphappy | yes, I will do that in the metrics one, but i was talking about the here and now | 07:58 |
John5342 | comphappy: seems like a good interim solution | 07:58 |
poelcat_ | comphappy: yes, but only NEW | 07:58 |
beland | For triage days, we should pick a day, throw a page up on the wiki with instructions for how to get on IRC and listing willing IRC mentors, and make a list announcement. | 07:59 |
poelcat_ | if our goal is to have triaged (not in NEW) the identified components | 07:59 |
adamw | beland: yes, that's basically my aim. | 07:59 |
mcepl | adamw: I will take a look at it | 08:00 |
comphappy | I will go ahead and add the rest of the comp, and remove assigned from the table | 08:00 |
comphappy | It looks like we are out of time. | 08:00 |
beland | Let me know when you are done, and I will copy the current numbers into the wiki. | 08:00 |
beland | I'll be on #fedora-bugzappers. | 08:01 |
mcepl | adamw: do you know whether he has Linux at all? (meaning that lalit guy)? | 08:01 |
comphappy | mcepl: based on his sig I would say yes | 08:02 |
* ltinkl zaps the zappers | 08:03 | |
mcepl | oh yes, OKL | 08:03 |
poelcat_ | we're overtime now... we can move to #fedora-bugzappers | 08:03 |
poelcat_ | thanks everyone! | 08:03 |
beland | Tata | 08:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!