From Fedora Project Wiki
- == Things to be considered for Packaging Guidelines == ...aScript||abadger1999|| Discuss||[[JavaScript libraries packaging guideline draft]] Libraries Packaged. See discussion page for Unresolved Issues ...4 KB (589 words) - 21:35, 6 January 2016
- {{admon/warning|This is a DRAFT}} Many of these packages were created before the current packaging guidelines were in place, or before some features were available in rpm or our build s ...2 KB (428 words) - 09:10, 11 February 2015
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-05-06} === * A new draft this week. ...8 KB (1,062 words) - 03:24, 21 December 2008
- {{Draft}} Following change to Packaging Guidelines is proposed: Add a section '''Use of Hard Links''' which would read: ...1 KB (171 words) - 07:20, 10 February 2009
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-02-12} === * Guidelines for packages using ggc-client-libs ...10 KB (1,438 words) - 03:23, 21 December 2008
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-18} === No new guidelines this week. ...4 KB (581 words) - 03:23, 21 December 2008
- {{draft|This is an update to the existing guidelines on /srv, /opt, and /usr/local}} ...<code>/var/opt/fedora/scls</code> for use by [[User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)| Software Collections]]. ...3 KB (497 words) - 16:22, 14 August 2014
- = DRAFT for Software Collection in Fedora = ...OpenShift or Foreman are already using scls for their development and for packaging of their projects. ...5 KB (782 words) - 07:12, 26 September 2013
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-11} === No new guidelines this week. ...7 KB (1,104 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
- Note that this is obsolete. Some other folks managed to suffer the pain of packaging this ton of crap. == Packaging node.js in Fedora == ...3 KB (429 words) - 11:43, 26 September 2013
- = BuildRoot Guidelines = '''Initial Draft:''' Thursday Feb 22, 2007<BR> ...4 KB (578 words) - 21:39, 21 February 2009
- * Java guidelines draft status * Packaging guidelines ...2 KB (225 words) - 22:00, 17 September 2016
- ...dy ratified|The final and ratified version of this draft is available at [[Packaging/SourceURL]]}} ...ease remember to use a Name-version-release compatible with the [wiki:Self:Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PackageVersion Version] and ...5 KB (811 words) - 20:00, 21 February 2009
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-12-04} === The following draft has been accepted by FESCO and is to be written into the guidelines: ...7 KB (1,043 words) - 03:23, 21 December 2008
- * New packaging guidelines status (akurtakov) ** See [[User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate|Draft]] ...1 KB (194 words) - 22:00, 17 September 2016
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-12} === * OCaml guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml ...13 KB (1,802 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
- ...al.org Drupal] content management platform version and introduce packaging guidelines. ...e ([https://github.com/siwinski/drupal8-rpms/blob/master/core/drupal8.spec draft]) ...5 KB (736 words) - 03:13, 16 February 2013
- * [[:Category:Draft documentation | Draft documents in progress]] ...ject/WritingDraftDocs| WritingDraftDocs]] for details. When you want your draft document reviewed, post a link on [https://redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedo ...5 KB (765 words) - 02:28, 26 February 2009
- ...wer performs for each review and building guideline checks for all Package guidelines which can be automated. ...s(very much obviously) running rpmlint on input files. We plan to push all guidelines checks to upstream rpmlint. But there are some hybrid checks which: ...6 KB (866 words) - 01:57, 22 January 2009
- === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-25} === No new guidelines this week. ...4 KB (533 words) - 03:23, 21 December 2008