From Fedora Project Wiki
- ...see how the new maintainer containment policy (2) and opening acls (3) to packagers helps first, since these are to be implemented in the very near future. If ...2 KB (204 words) - 19:47, 30 July 2008
- .... That's why we'd like to keep away from <code>%define</code>s and educate packagers to use <code>%global</code> by default to avoid creation of new latent bugs ...1 KB (218 words) - 23:28, 22 February 2009
- ...elopment of a particular piece of software within Fedora. The idea is for packagers to be able to change ownership information and set who has the ability to a ...3 KB (437 words) - 22:00, 8 January 2010
- PatriceDumas will propose this to the rpm packagers if this is ...1 KB (237 words) - 02:16, 25 February 2009
- To assist packagers in bringing Perl-related packages to Fedora Extras and assisting in their c ...re information available [http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/packagers-handbook/packagers-handbook.html#guidelines-perl-cpansign here] and in bug [https://bugzilla ...7 KB (1,020 words) - 04:26, 8 November 2008
- ...es for a solid learning on issues related to official fedora teams (infra, packagers, designers, translators, etc). ...es for a solid learning on issues related to official fedora teams (infra, packagers, designers, translators, etc). ...7 KB (933 words) - 21:06, 4 August 2017
- ...tended to work in packaging. We expect to recruit at least five new Fedora Packagers. The event will be split into to weekend days. One for training and another ...915 bytes (130 words) - 23:51, 20 February 2014
- ...didn't fill the past role of "active reviewer". Some were only very active packagers but didn't do much reviewing. ...2 KB (241 words) - 11:21, 15 January 2009
- * (email alias) rocm-packagers-sig AT fedoraproject ...861 bytes (123 words) - 16:50, 29 August 2023
- ...relative link or an absolute link. In Fedora, neither method is required. Packagers should use their best judgement when deciding which method of symlink creat ...1 KB (225 words) - 20:34, 17 February 2009
- == Packagers/Reviewers/People == ...7 KB (868 words) - 03:31, 24 November 2011
- ...sig] FAS group is only for our packagers (it will require you to be in the Packagers group already.) ...3 KB (456 words) - 22:05, 26 April 2024
- The whole lifecycle of a font package, and the role played by packagers in it, are explained in [[Font_package_lifecycle|this article]]. ...17 members (1 subcategory, 0 files) - 14:32, 11 April 2012
- == Frequently made mistakes while packaging RPMs by new packagers == Especially new packagers sometimes make some mistakes that make reviewing hard and painful for both ...3 KB (431 words) - 20:30, 12 March 2021
- == Members/Packagers/Reviewers == ...5 KB (683 words) - 11:20, 29 October 2022
- Packagers should revisit an explicit dependency as appropriate to avoid ...2 KB (244 words) - 16:49, 22 February 2009
- ...e package. If upstream versions the shared library file at a future point, packagers must be careful to move to the versioned layout described above. When in doubt as to whether a file belongs in the base package or in -devel, packagers should consider whether the file is necessary to be present for a user to u ...4 KB (647 words) - 15:11, 19 October 2011
- software easily maintained by packagers. This iteration of the Objective ** Improved and expanded documentation to guide packagers on when and how to modularize their components ...3 KB (359 words) - 14:07, 7 February 2024
- package by other distributions/packagers in the past. You can also request ...1 KB (169 words) - 20:54, 18 June 2015
- ** most affected packagers have been notified (those we could identify) ...sting font packages have never been changed to conform to those rules, and packagers that shipped fonts as part of some other whole have largely ignored them. T ...10 KB (1,400 words) - 13:40, 22 February 2009