AurelienBompard

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(add mugshot)
(Redirecting to User:Abompard)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
= Aurélien Bompard =
+
#REDIRECT [[User:Abompard]]
 
+
'''Email''': aurelien at bompard dot org
+
 
+
'''Jabber''': abompard(a)jabber.fr
+
 
+
I'm rarely on IRC, but when I am it's on #fedora and #fedora-extras
+
 
+
'''GPG Key''': [http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1B4259B3 1B4259B3]
+
 
+
'''Location''': Paris, France (GMT+1, +2 during summer)
+
 
+
'''Profession''': Sysadmin
+
 
+
'''Company''': [http://www.c-s.fr/Logiciels-libres_r168.html CS Communication & Systems]
+
 
+
'''Homepage''': http://aurelien.bompard.org  (in french)
+
 
+
'''Mugshot page''': http://mugshot.org/person?who=wgDR81qArkWRpJ
+
 
+
 
+
= Participation in the Fedora Project =
+
 
+
==== Packaging ====
+
 
+
I'm a packager for Fedora Extras. I maintain around 40 packages in Fedora Extras, of which the most famous are:
+
* amarok
+
* awstats
+
* glest
+
* gwenview
+
* psi
+
* pure-ftpd
+
* php-adodb
+
* showimg
+
* tiger
+
* ulogd
+
* xine-lib
+
 
+
==== QA ====
+
 
+
I also do as much QA as I can on the new submission request for Extras.
+
 
+
I know a little python and I've written a script to automate these QA checks. You can find it here : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/fedora-qa
+
 
+
The aim of this script is to test all the MUST items in PackageReviewGuidelines which are not covered by rpmlint.
+
 
+
This script requires python, mock, rpmlint and yum-utils. To use it, follow these steps:
+
* Create the rpm build directory structure, for example with fedora-buildrpmtree from the fedora-rpmdevtools package.
+
* cd to a temp dir (ex: ~/tmp) in a terminal.
+
* run '''fedora-qa <bugid>''' or '''fedora-qa <srpm>'''
+
* answer the questions, and a report will be printed. The report and additional files (like binaries, build log, etc...) can be found in the "~/reports/<rpm_name>" directory. The "~/reports" base dir can be configured in ~/.fedora-qa
+
 
+
The script is very likely to give false-positives, so don't take everything it says for granted. The idea is more to show you where to dig.
+
 
+
Here are the tests performed (in this order):
+
<pre>$ fedora-qa -l
+
CheckName : ask the user if the name-version-release is correct
+
CheckSpecDiff : diff the spec files in case of update
+
CheckSources : check upstream sources: returns a list of lines for the report
+
CheckPatches : checks the patches in the srpm
+
CheckBRConsistency : Checks that only one of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} is used
+
CheckBuildRoot : Checks that the BuildRoot is the Fedora-preferred one
+
CheckDFU : Checks that the desktop-file-utils is required if desktop-file-install is used
+
CheckBRExceptions : Checks that the package does not have excluded BuildRequires
+
CheckEncoding : Checks that the spec file is in ASCII or UTF-8
+
CheckSpecName : Checks that the spec filename is %{name}.spec
+
CheckSMPFlags : Checks that the smp flags are set for make
+
CheckQTEnvVars : Checks that the QT environment variables are set
+
CheckRelocatable : Checks that the package is not marked Relocatable
+
CheckClean : Checks that the specfile contains a proper %%clean section
+
CheckBRDuplicates : Checks that the package does not have duplicate BuildRequires
+
CheckRPMMacros : Checks that paths are replaced with RPM macros
+
CheckRequiresPrePost : Checks that the form "Requires(pre,post)" is not used
+
CheckLatestVersion : Checks that the package uses the latest version
+
CheckForbiddenTag : Checks that the package does not contain forbidden tags
+
CheckDownloadableSource : checks if at least one of the source is an URL
+
CheckCleanBRInInstall : Checks that the specfile cleans the BuildRoot in %install
+
CheckFindLangGettext : Checks that gettext is Required if the %find_lang macro is used
+
CheckNoarch : checks if the package is improperly built for noarch
+
CheckMakeInstallMacro : Checks that the %makeinstall macro is not used
+
CheckGhostPyo : checks if the *.pyo files are %%ghost'ed
+
CheckSpec : Just read the spec file
+
CheckDiffTemplate : Diff against the template for relevant packages
+
CheckBuildMock : Builds the RPM with mock
+
CheckRpmlint : unleashes rpmlint at the srpm and the binary rpm if the build is complete
+
CheckFiles : checks files list and ownership
+
CheckDesktopFile : checks the presence of a .desktop file if the package depends on xorg.
+
CheckLicenseFile : checks the presence of a license file.
+
CheckFileListedTwice : checks if a file has been listed multiple times in %%files
+
CheckDefattr : checks if all the %%files sections contain %%defattr() instructions
+
CheckLibtoolArchives : checks the presence of a .la libtool archives
+
CheckDesktopFileProperties : checks if the desktop files are valid
+
CheckScriptletsRequirements : Checks that the usual programs found in the scriptlets are Required
+
CheckLangTag : checks that the translation files are tagged
+
CheckDBUpdate : checks that the package updates the proper database in the scriptlets if it has corresponding files
+
CheckOwnedDirs : checks that the package does not own standard dirs
+
CheckConfigFiles : checks config files list and ownership
+
CheckPkgconfig : checks if the package needs to Require pkgconfig
+
CheckHicolor : checks if the package needs to Require hicolor-icon-theme
+
CheckOptFlags : checks if the rpm honors the compiler flags
+
</pre>
+
 
+
==== Help and Communication ====
+
 
+
I'm a [[Mentors| Fedora Mentor]] , which means you should feel free to contact me if you think I can help you as regards to packaging or processes. I'm also a [[Ambassadors| Fedora Ambassador]]  for Paris and its surroundings in France. Feel free to contact me if you live in this area and you want information about Fedora. I'll try to attend as many Linux-related events as I can, see you there !
+
 
+
----
+
[[Category:Homepage]]
+
[[Category:AmbassadorsFrance]]
+

Latest revision as of 06:36, 28 May 2008

  1. REDIRECT User:Abompard