From Fedora Project Wiki

m (Blocker review meetings)
(Missed F14s)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==


This page is intended to gather feedback from the Fedora [[QA]] community on things that worked well and things that could have been better with the testing of Fedora 14.  The feedback will be used as a basis for identifying areas for improvement for Fedora 14 testing.  Any thoughts, big or small, are valuable.  If someone already provided feedback similar to what you'd like to add, don't worry ... add your thoughts regardless.
This page is intended to gather feedback from the Fedora [[QA]] community on things that worked well and things that could have been better with the testing of Fedora 15.  The feedback will be used as a basis for identifying areas for improvement for Fedora 15 testing.  Any thoughts, big or small, are valuable.  If someone already provided feedback similar to what you'd like to add, don't worry ... add your thoughts regardless.


For any questions or concerns, send mail to [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test test@lists.fedoraproject.org].
For any questions or concerns, send mail to [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test test@lists.fedoraproject.org].

Revision as of 05:24, 2 March 2011

Introduction

This page is intended to gather feedback from the Fedora QA community on things that worked well and things that could have been better with the testing of Fedora 15. The feedback will be used as a basis for identifying areas for improvement for Fedora 15 testing. Any thoughts, big or small, are valuable. If someone already provided feedback similar to what you'd like to add, don't worry ... add your thoughts regardless.

For any questions or concerns, send mail to test@lists.fedoraproject.org.

Providing feedback

  • Gwjasu - I like ____ about the new ____ process

Adding feedback is fairly straight forward. If you already have a Fedora account ...

  1. Login to the wiki
  2. Select [Edit] for the appropriate section below.
  3. Add your feedback using the format:
    * ~~~ - I like ____ about the new ____ process
  4. When done, Submit your changes

Otherwise, if you do not have a Fedora account, follow the instructions below ...

  1. Select the appropriate page for your feedback...
  2. Add your feedback using the format:
    * ~~~ - I like ____ about the new ____ process
  3. When done, Submit your changes

Feedback

Things that went well

Could have been better

  1. jlaska - Alpha-TC wasn't branched - F15 Alpha test compose was created using pre-branched content. This was unexpected, but it appears that there is no clear guidance/documentation on what is expected (see https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4399)
  2. jsmith - Mass rebuild not included in schedule - The mass rebuild timing wasn't ideal, it landed at the same time of the branch. While release engineering did an outstanding job resolving rebuild issues in a timely manner, the schedule didn't account for the mass rebuild, and test composes were delayed.
  3. jlaska - insufficient live testing - Because of RHBZ #672265 and RHBZ #676904 we didn't get a lot of testing on the live images prior to, and during the Alpha test composes. As a result, once those issues were fixed, we found 3 additional Alpha blockers
    • RHBZ #679107 - TypeError: argument 2 to map() must support iteration
    • RHBZ #663294 - RuntimeError: XOpenDisplay failed }} - TypeError: argument 2 to map() must support iteration
    • RHBZ #672030 - AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'format' }} - TypeError: argument 2 to map() must support iteration
  4. jlaska - missed first 2 blocker review meetings - Not sure what else to say ... we forgot about these meetings. With FUDCon and PTO, the first two completely fell off my radar.

Wishlist

References