From Fedora Project Wiki
(Note that the release name has both a private and public persona) |
(Add some things from the mailing list) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== People interested == | |||
* Pam Chestek | |||
* Toshio Kuratomi | |||
* Jaroslav Reznik | |||
* Stephen Smoogen | |||
* (?) Máirín Duffy, John Rose, Maria Leandro, Emily Dirsch (These people have participated heavily in the discussions but haven't explicitly said they want to meet) | |||
== What do we get from the current process == | == What do we get from the current process == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 15: | ||
* A process that involves new contributors to Fedora | * A process that involves new contributors to Fedora | ||
* The release name is treated somewhat as an internal code name but it has become more a public part of the Fedora release due to: 1) tying it to the theming process and 2) the press sometimes referring to it by the release name. | * The release name is treated somewhat as an internal code name but it has become more a public part of the Fedora release due to: 1) tying it to the theming process and 2) the press sometimes referring to it by the release name. | ||
* Pre-vetting of names before being passed to Legal (saves us valuable lawyer time and money) | |||
* Opportunities for unique marketing | |||
== What do people want from a revised process == | == What do people want from a revised process == | ||
Revision as of 18:02, 9 May 2012
People interested
- Pam Chestek
- Toshio Kuratomi
- Jaroslav Reznik
- Stephen Smoogen
- (?) Máirín Duffy, John Rose, Maria Leandro, Emily Dirsch (These people have participated heavily in the discussions but haven't explicitly said they want to meet)
What do we get from the current process
- A theme for the release wallpaper, website, other artwork
- A "less cold" way to refer to the release
- A process that involves new contributors to Fedora
- The release name is treated somewhat as an internal code name but it has become more a public part of the Fedora release due to: 1) tying it to the theming process and 2) the press sometimes referring to it by the release name.
- Pre-vetting of names before being passed to Legal (saves us valuable lawyer time and money)
- Opportunities for unique marketing
What do people want from a revised process
- A theme for the distribution that spans releases
- A naming scheme that makes it more obvious when a release happened (not necessarily date-wise... maybe sequence is a better description)
- A process that gets new contributors excited that they have joined Fedora
- A "less cold" way to refer to the release
- Something that's still fun
Proposals
Mizmo has a proposal (Suggestions_for_Fedora_Codename_Theme) to use a single theme for the rest of the Fedora releases. Not sure of some details. Once an overall theme is chosen, how are individual names for each release selected? are we just replacing the "is-a" relationship criteria of the current process with a relation to the theme and continuing to vote?