From Fedora Project Wiki

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Fedora Project Board Meeting :: Tuesday 2008-03-25

Roll Call

Attendees: Paul Frields, Jef Spaleta, Steve Dickson, Seth Vidal, Karsten Wade, Bill Nottingham, Matt Domsch, Dennis Gilmore, John Poelstra, Chris Aillon

Regrets: Bob McWirther

Followup to Previous Business

fedoraproject.org mail (2008-01-29)

  • Take steps to approach changes that were requested in the past
  • Could we create a better start and search page for Fedora mailing list?
  • ACTION: check back on status in one month
  • OWNER: Dennis Gilmore
  • FOLLOWUP 2008-02-26
  • Dennis has spoken with some people inside RHT IS
  • should have no issues making a fedora branded interface to Red Hats mailman instance and having a @fedoraproject.org alias for fedora lists
  • existing lists will stay where they are
  • could migrate all mailing lists to fedoraproject.org in time time if so desired
  • driving forces here is:

1. making everything run Fedora 1. break ties to RHT IS which does not make Fedora a priority

  • fedoraproject.org email addresses lost four days of email a week ago and RHT did nothing to try and remedy the problem
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-25
  • No update at this time
  • OWNER: Dennis needs to sit down and work things out with Red Hat IS
  • Next followup on 2008-04-29

Post-release updates of custom spins (2008-01-29)

  • Should the board have to approve them?
  • We will hosts as many spins as we have space for
  • Need to determine the hosting requirements and limits
  • How long will spins stay around?
  • http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/SpinsProcess
  • ACTION: Jef to review Rahul's proposal and report back to board
  • OWNER: Jef Spaleta
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-02-12
  • Jef is waiting for feedback from Jeremy Katz on release engineering's perspective
  • Reference: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/Meetings/2008-feb-11
  • People are still not clear on exactly what is required to create an official "Fedora Spin"
  • Need a clear list of guidelines of what a spin owner is responsible for and what they are required to test
  • Hoping a test will come from Jeremy Katz as part of feedback from release engineering
  • We are only talking about spins that use GA packages, thus testing for GA should have given us enough comfort that risk is minimized
  • We only need to be concerned with new combination of packages that a spin would present
  • ACTIONS & OWNERS:
  • Paul Frields--followup with Fedora Release Engineering and QA contingent to discuss testing requirements
  • Jef Spaleta to formulate specific guidelines for review prior to or at next board meeting (dependent on feedback from release engineering)
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-02-19
  • Crux of issue right now is figuring out exactly what input release engineering is supposed to be giving
  • Jef will have a writeup to the board by next meeting
  • Paul will be at the Red Hat office in Westford, MA next week and can sit down and work out any of the remaining details with Jeremy, Jesse, Will, etc.
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-02-26
  • releng has created http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JeremyKatz/SpinChecklist
  • Jef has input from Rahul and plans to start writing a draft
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-04
  • Jef posting proposal to fedora-advisory-board-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-March/msg00004.html
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-11
  • Jef posting updated proposal to fedora-advisory-board-list today and ongoing discussion will continue on fedora-advisory-board-list:
  • https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-March/msg00074.html
  • GOALS:

1. Solidify rest of the policy this week 1. Board to vote on proposal at next meeting

  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-18
  • Jef was unable to attend today--deferred to next meeting.
  • FOLLOWUP on 2008-03-25
  • Remaining issues to resolve before final written proposal:

1. Specifying what space (infrastructure storage) limits are 1. Need a policy decision around locally built spins from official kickstart files from Fedora CVS (which have trademark approval) 1. Need to resolve issue with how/where source RPMS will be provided

New Business

Trademark Licensing

  • Legal preparing an agreement for schwag producers
  • People that want to produce schwag can sign trademark licensing agreement
  • Control remains with Red Hat to review and enforce usage
  • OWNER: Paul Frields
  • ACTIONS:

1. Continuing to meet with Legal to review final draft 1. Work to smooth out issue of licensing trademark with custom spins

Fedora Accounts

  • What are the procedures for disabling questionable Fedora accounts?
  • Continue discussion at next meeting

IRC Meeting Next Time

  • Channels are already setup and ready go
  • Need moderator
  • Administrative process outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/IRC
  • OWNER: Paul Frields
  • ACTIONS: Check with Max Spevack to see if he will be the moderator again


Future Business

Next Meeting

  • Date: 2008-04-01
  • Time: 14:00 EDT
  • Location: IRC
  • Public channel to ask questions: #fedora-board-public
  • Moderated channel for board answers: #fedora-board-meetings
  • Board to only join moderated channel so as to focus discussion there