From Fedora Project Wiki

< QA‎ | Meetings

m (Updated open discussion topics)
Line 9: Line 9:
= Agenda =
= Agenda =
* [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-January/096411.html Proposed meeting agenda]
* [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-January/096411.html Proposed meeting agenda]
* [FIXME MeetBot summary]
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-17/fedora-qa.2011-01-17-16.00.html MeetBot summary]


== Previous meeting follow-up ==
== Previous meeting follow-up ==

Revision as of 17:09, 17 January 2011

Attendees

People present (lines said)

Unable to attend:

  1. Rhe (hopefully sleeping)
  2. Hongqing (hopefully sleeping)

Agenda

Previous meeting follow-up

  1. Bodhi feedback patch from fcami (see infrastructure ticket#701 awaiting review
No updates on https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/bodhi/2010-December/000543.html

Update on critpath test definition (ticket#154)

Owner
adamwill
Summary
See fedora-qa ticket#154
The new system has gone public (see announcement at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2011-January/000171.html)
Next steps ...
<insert next steps here>

Latest and greatest on autoqa-0.4.4

Owner
kparal
Summary
Kparal pushed mkrizek's support for staging server into master
Next steps ...
  1. What's the status of depcheck?
    1. Wwoods posting blog article explaining the need for autoqa ticket#248
    2. Determine appropriate strategy for watcher and depcheck integration, and revise patchset as needed
  2. Merge clumens branch into master

Update on TCMS nitrate analysis (ticket#152)

Owner
rhe
Summary
See fedora-qa ticket#152
TCMS Use Cases available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases
  • Rhe regrouped the use cases by general and main test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for organizing the events.
Wiki and Nitrate comparison available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_Comparison
  • The comparison is grouped according to the use cases. It has overlaps between each other which I need to further update. But the basic idea is shown, please review them and welcome to provide any comments about the grouping idea/design format/contents.
Next steps ...
HELP - Feedback needed ... last chance!
Identify and prioritize MUSTHAVE and SHOULDHAVE features
Begin roll-out of staging server for testing during Fedora 15

Open discussion - <Your topic here>

Anyone interested in data mining smolt?

http://smolts.org/

Anyone interested in understanding and gathering smolt statistics for use with the upcoming graphics test days?

2010-01-27 - Network Device Naming test day

Coming soon ... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-01-27_Network_Device_Naming_With_Biosdevname

Action items