DynamicBuildRequires
Summary
Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this.
Owner
- Name: Igor Gnatenko, Florian Festi, Miroslav Suchý
- Email: ignatenkobrain@fedoraproject.org, ffesti@redhat.com, miroslav@suchy.cz
- Release notes owner:
Current status
- Targeted release: Fedora 31
- Last updated: 2022-08-31
- Tracker bug: #1704773
- Release notes tracker: #335
Detailed Description
For many languages (Rust, Golang, Node.Js, Ruby, Python, Haskell), BuildRequires can be automatically generated. All it takes, run some special tool which will output dependencies in RPM format.
Changes in tooling
rpmbuild
- New
%generate_buildrequiressection ("script" later in text) in spec file - New option
-brwhich will run script, check dynamic BuildRequires- If all of them are satisfied, generate
src.rpm - If some of them are not satisfied or
--nodepsis present, generatebuildreqs.nosrc.rpm
- If all of them are satisfied, generate
src.rpmproduced byrpmbuild -bawill contain dynamic BuildRequires- Option
-bsdoes not change behavior src.rpmproduced from spec file which has%generate_buildrequireshasRequires: rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires)src.rpmwhich contain dynamic BuildRequires hasProvides: rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires)for identification purposes
mock
- New option in config
dynamic_buildrequireswhich controls support of new features - Support for rpmbuild changes if this option enabled
Example
Probably the easiest demonstration of how this works is to show an example.
Create this simple SPEC file ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/dynamic-buildrequires.spec:
Name: dynamic-buildrequires
Version: 1
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Demonstration of Dynamic BuildRequires
License: GPLv3+
# static buildrequires
BuildRequires: bash
%description
This package demonstrate Dynamic BuildRequires
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DynamicBuildRequires
%generate_buildrequires
echo fruit-cake
%files
%changelog
* Thu Jun 13 2019 Miroslav Suchy <msuchy@redhat.com> - 1-2
- initial version
This SPEC file has a new section %generate_buildrequires which contains a script. The output of this script is interpreted as additional BuildRequires. The list accrues to classic BuildRequires tags. In this example we dynamically added BuildRequires of fruit-cake (which does not exist).
Now if you try to build this package:
# rpmbuild -ba dynamic-buildrequires.spec
Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JMyoKz
+ umask 022
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ echo fruit-cake
+ exit 0
error: Failed build dependencies:
fruit-cake is needed by dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.x86_64
Wrote: /rpmbuild/SRPMS/dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm
# echo $?
11
Two things happened: rpmbuild exited with exit code 11. This indicates the unsatisfied dynamic BuildRequires. If our script would produce a line with 'bash' we would likely have it already installed and rpmbuild would proceed further without failure.
Additionally, And notice that this is 'buildreqs.nosrc.rpm'. If you would extract the content of the NOSRC.RPM it would contain the original SPEC file, but there would be no sources attached. But most importantly - the requires of this package include the dynamically generated dependencies:
# rpm -qpR rpmbuild/SRPMS/dynamic-buildrequires-1-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm bash fruit-cake rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires) <= 4.15.0-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
Rust Example
First, let's make necessary changes in our spec file (I'm taking rust-rpick).
diff --git a/rust-rpick.spec b/rust-rpick.spec
index 716a185..01a6d35 100644
--- a/rust-rpick.spec
+++ b/rust-rpick.spec
@@ -16,12 +16,6 @@ Source: %{crates_source}
ExclusiveArch: %{rust_arches}
BuildRequires: rust-packaging
-BuildRequires: (crate(dirs/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(dirs/default) < 2.0.0)
-BuildRequires: (crate(rand/default) >= 0.6.0 with crate(rand/default) < 0.7.0)
-BuildRequires: (crate(serde/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/default) < 2.0.0)
-BuildRequires: (crate(serde/derive) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/derive) < 2.0.0)
-BuildRequires: (crate(serde_yaml/default) >= 0.8.0 with crate(serde_yaml/default) < 0.9.0)
-BuildRequires: (crate(structopt/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(structopt/default) < 0.3.0)
%global _description \
Helps you pick items from a list by various algorithms. Example uses: pick a\
@@ -69,6 +63,9 @@ which use "default" feature of "%{crate}" crate.
%autosetup -n %{crate}-%{version_no_tilde} -p1
%cargo_prep
+%generate_buildrequires
+%cargo_generate_buildrequires
+
%build
%cargo_build
Then let's try to build package (I will skip parts like rustc executions because it is irrelevant).
⋊> ~/P/s/r/rust-rpick on master ⨯ fedpkg mockbuild --mock-config $PWD/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-buildreqs.cfg
Wrote: /home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
INFO: mock.py version 1.4.14 starting (python version = 3.7.3)...
[…]
INFO: Start(/home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64-buildreqs)
[…]
Start: build phase for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
Start: build setup for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
Repository 'kkt' is missing name in configuration, using id.
fedora 21 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00
kkt 2.6 MB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repo Size
================================================================================
Installing:
rust-packaging x86_64 6-28.fc31+buildreqs kkt 13 k
Installing dependencies:
[…]
Finish: build setup for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
Start: rpmbuild rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
Start: Outputting list of installed packages
Finish: Outputting list of installed packages
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0m57Wu
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ rm -rf rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/rpick-0.3.0.crate
+ /usr/bin/tar -xof -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ set -eu
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p .cargo
+ cat
+ /usr/bin/rm -f Cargo.lock
+ exit 0
Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LooeBv
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -BR Cargo.toml
+ /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -TR Cargo.toml
+ exit 0
Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.buildreqs.nosrc.rpm
INFO: Dynamic buildrequires detected
Repository 'kkt' is missing name in configuration, using id.
fedora 17 kB/s | 19 kB 00:01
kkt 2.8 MB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00
Package rust-packaging-6-28.fc31+buildreqs.x86_64 is already installed.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repo Size
================================================================================
Installing:
rust-dirs+default-devel noarch 1.0.5-1.fc31 fedora 7.6 k
rust-rand+default-devel noarch 0.6.5-3.fc31 fedora 8.4 k
rust-serde+default-devel noarch 1.0.90-1.fc31 fedora 12 k
rust-serde+derive-devel noarch 1.0.90-1.fc31 fedora 12 k
rust-serde_yaml+default-devel noarch 0.8.8-2.fc30 fedora 8.3 k
rust-structopt+default-devel noarch 0.2.15-2.fc31 fedora 8.2 k
Installing dependencies:
[…]
Building target platforms: x86_64
Building for target x86_64
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.l2cC5s
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ rm -rf rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/gzip -dc /builddir/build/SOURCES/rpick-0.3.0.crate
+ /usr/bin/tar -xof -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ set -eu
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p .cargo
+ cat
+ /usr/bin/rm -f Cargo.lock
+ exit 0
Executing(buildreqs): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.cvhwuw
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -BR Cargo.toml
+ /usr/bin/cargo-inspector -TR Cargo.toml
+ exit 0
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dlI3ax
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd rpick-0.3.0
+ /usr/bin/env CARGO_HOME=.cargo RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 /usr/bin/cargo build -j8 -Z avoid-dev-deps --release
[…]
Finish: build phase for rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm
INFO: Done(/home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64-buildreqs) 2 minutes 9 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/brain/Projects/src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rpick/results_rust-rpick/0.3.0/1.fc31
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_success=True')
Start: clean chroot
Finish: clean chroot
Finish: run
Let's check dependencies of src.rpm.
⋊> ~/P/s/r/rust-rpick on master ⨯ rpm -qpR $PWD/results_rust-rpick/0.3.0/1.fc31/rust-rpick-0.3.0-1.fc31.src.rpm (crate(dirs/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(dirs/default) < 2.0.0) (crate(rand/default) >= 0.6.0 with crate(rand/default) < 0.7.0) (crate(serde/default) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/default) < 2.0.0) (crate(serde/derive) >= 1.0.0 with crate(serde/derive) < 2.0.0) (crate(serde_yaml/default) >= 0.8.0 with crate(serde_yaml/default) < 0.9.0) (crate(structopt/default) >= 0.2.0 with crate(structopt/default) < 0.3.0) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(DynamicBuildRequires) <= 4.15.0-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(RichDependencies) <= 4.12.0-1 rust-packaging
Go Example
For Go language, you can use %go_generate_buildrequires macro. See full example here: https://pagure.io/go-rpm-macros/blob/master/f/templates/rpm/spectemplate-go-0-source-minimal.spec#_103
Python
BuildRequires: pyproject-rpm-macros %generate_buildrequires %pyproject_buildrequires
This will read the dependencies from setup_requires from setup.py. If you want to read the dependencies from install_requires and use them as BuildRequires then you have to use %pyproject_buildrequires -r.
For more information see https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
Benefit to Fedora
Packagers won't have to pre-generate BuildRequires in the spec file which means it will be always updated (and correct) :
- Packagers can focus of making their packages better instead of spending all their packaging time copying BuildRequires from documentation and third party tools.
- BuildRequires are dropped as soon as they're no longer necessary
- Packages can be easily bumped without requiring a manual BuildRequires refresh
- BuildRequires and Requires generation can use similar utilities, making sure that the deps packages declare can also be used for second-level building. Packages no longer need to declare the deps of their second and n-th dependencies because someone forgot to declare them in the correct package.
Scope
- Proposal owners: Implement support for a feature in RPM1 and mock1. Make use of it in interested ecosystems.
- Other developers: Maintainers of language stacks are advised to use this feature.
- Release engineering: #8129
- List of deliverables: N/A
- Policies and guidelines: Packaging Guidelines need to be updated with instructions how to use this feature.
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
Upgrade/compatibility impact
Packagers and users who use repoquery might be affected (src.rpm might not contain generated dependencies). -- repoquery actually returns generated BuildRequires
How To Test
- Make sure you have new
rpm-build(OPTION 1) ormock(OPTION 2). - Add
%generate_buildrequiresscript into spec file which prints dependencies, remove static BuildRequires - Build package
- OPTION1: Run
rpmbuild -bawith your usual workflow - OPTION2: Run
mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64with your usual workflow
- OPTION1: Run
- Check that your package builds fine, dependencies are getting checked/installed and final src.rpm contains generated BuildRequires
User Experience
For people/tooling who build RPMs, it might be needed to run dnf builddep on new file generated by RPM when dynamic BuildRequires detected and unsatisfied ones found - buildreqs.nosrc.rpm. RPM will guide you where it stored it and which name file has.
Dependencies
Required feature needs to be implemented in RPM and mock.
Contingency Plan
- Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) Proposal Owners might still ship feature disabled for Fedora buildsystem but have it available for end-users, and move full completion to the next release.
- Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze
- Blocks release? No.
- Blocks product? No.
Documentation
TBD.
