Extra/QAFormat

From FedoraProject

Jump to: navigation, search

QAFormat

When you review a package, it is better to do it in the standard way described on this page, to make it possible to automate the publishing of the package. Here is a proposal of the standard package for QA approvals (example for bash-completion):

PUBLISH +1 or NEEDSWORK

Depending on reviewer's recommendation

MD5SUMS:
4e22320fa05de9afb7ecc5b8d93d6343  bash-completion-0.0-0.fdr.3.20040331.src.rpm

SRPM is always first and separated by a blank line

0150cfba28bdb6e8c4af3edf499bb5d6  bash-completion-20040331.tar.bz2
d19cbd44f21a9468c28d7f7dddba886b  bash-completion.spec
9cd30bf23d82dacc6a0745ff972f6610  bash-completion.profile

Sources:
* bash-completion-20040331.tar.bz2: OK valid, canonical location
* bash-completion.profile: OK appears to do good work

Good:
* Package name follows standard
* SRPM Signature verified: - bcd241cb <ville.skytta(a)xemacs.org>
* Builds without problems on FC1
* (Un)Installs/Upgrades without problems on FC1
* Runs on FC1
* Spec file -- Looked at and appears fine

Needswork:

list of problems encountered in the package review, if any

Notes:

Put here other things you want to add about the package