SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-11

From FedoraProject

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Meeting Time

Participants

Agenda

  • topics to discuss:
    • Default install paths for apidocs
    • Duplicate menu entries, e.g. #591089:
      • Do we consider these bugs?
      • Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them?
      • If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases?
      • Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers.
    • KDE SC 4.4.3 status
  • recent bugs:
    • (none)

Transcript

Summary

KDE SC 4.4.3 status

  • kde-l10n needs respin and build
  • ACTION: ltinkl to respin and build kde-l10n and to prepare Bodhi update

Duplicate menu entries

  • See [1], [2], [3]
    • Do we consider these bugs?
    • Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them?
    • If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases?
    • Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers.
  • AGREED: on Kevin Kofler's proposal - report upstream, follow upstream's decision, don't treat it as a release blocker

Default install paths for apidocs

  • we are inconsistent in apidocs directories naming and location
    • soprano contains version, some apidocs are installed in doc/lib-apidocs/, some doc/HTML/en/lib-apidocs
    • we need consistent naming and common install location
      • AGREED: apidocs not to be installed to version specific directories
      • AGREED: on adapting to KDevelop needs, rdieter to check it
  • final decision postponed to next meeting

Comments