From Fedora Project Wiki

  • * Merged Fedora's patch for mDNS/DNS-SD support using Avahi * package cups-filters (100% DONE, [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=83213
    9 KB (1,378 words) - 12:08, 9 May 2013
  • ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc]) ...the [[QA/Test_Days|current schedule]] and see if a similar but more recent Test Day is planned or has already happened.}}
    10 KB (1,432 words) - 23:54, 18 June 2015
  • ...d unit file? Do we have QA test booting Fedora with upstart? If we don't test that the init scripts work, I think that the argument that the init scripts # Package install, not upgrade
    17 KB (2,619 words) - 18:04, 23 February 2011
  • avahi:x:70:70:Avahi mDNS/DNS-SD Stack:/var/run/avahi-daemon:/sbin/nologin ...ritten CLIs (e.g. virsh, smartctl), setup tools (e.g. ipa-server-install), test scripts could be replaced by System Configuration Shell modules
    11 KB (1,491 words) - 15:56, 12 February 2013
  • avahi In some exceptional cases it might be necessary to add drop-in files to /etc/tmpfiles.d/ to some pack
    5 KB (792 words) - 14:01, 15 March 2011
  • ...it applications on x86_64). Dropping i686 architecture support from a leaf package will no longer be considered a breaking change, will not require any announ ...6, not even RPM repositories for i686 are published any longer. The kernel package itself also [[Changes/Stop Building i686 Kernels|dropped support for i686]]
    12 KB (1,934 words) - 11:02, 24 August 2022
  • * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution ...release engineering (e.g. changes to installer image generation or update package delivery)? Is a mass rebuid required? If a rel-eng ticket exists, add a l
    25 KB (3,491 words) - 14:41, 29 July 2015
  • For example: This change allows package upgrades to be performed automatically and rolled-back at will. Does this improve some specific package or set of packages?
    21 KB (3,334 words) - 15:20, 17 February 2021
  • ...s with seeing or connecting to the printer (it can be cups backend issues, avahi issues, libusb issues, cups-browsed issues), ...it is unwanted for other queues, because it can be hard to read in larger cases. Please attach incident-bound journald log only when it is necessary.
    61 KB (9,757 words) - 15:59, 8 August 2022
  • ...tails on the latest Test Days for Fedora, including next week's preupgrade Test Day, as well as a look at Fedora 15 beta preparations. Security Advisories ====Reminder: today is GNOME 3 Test Day #2====
    19 KB (2,650 words) - 13:34, 17 March 2011
  • .... In PlanetFedora "Tech Tidbits" contains some juicy morsels on evaluating package sizes and Haskell. In Developments we examine the process of "Getting Back ...ory locations. What we don't have quite yet is the updated fedora-release package in the old updates location that will get you the new keys and the new repo
    39 KB (5,748 words) - 08:16, 18 September 2016
  • ...5 update is needed to solve an ARM-related problem that exists with the GA package, simply push that update into stage4 and note this (and the reasoning) unde DEBUG util.py:247: Error: No Package found for osutil
    54 KB (8,126 words) - 11:58, 16 November 2011
  • ...the bare package manager. Please be sure to read [[Upgrading Fedora using package manager]] for an overview of the entire process as well as the release-spec ...very special'''. Far beyond the general warning that upgrading with just a package manager is not recommended, the /usr move makes upgrading to Fedora 17 or l
    40 KB (6,276 words) - 00:48, 2 November 2016
  • == Package WebUI == ...the end user and allow them to give feedback/enhanced information about a package.
    35 KB (5,620 words) - 15:34, 18 September 2016
  • ''Hasson Ofer <hassonofer AT gmail.com> : Will you make official gimp 2.4.1 package to fedora 7 ?'' This update is a major version change. Please test thoroughly. Don't
    47 KB (6,690 words) - 10:58, 14 April 2009
  • ...y to build a custom Fedora mirror tailored specifically to one's installed package set. ...ocess which include: man pages for each syscall, bug fixing and reporting, test suites, crypto work, virtualization with strong guarantees of <code>VM</cod
    44 KB (6,236 words) - 10:38, 14 April 2009
  • ...Meeuwen|Jeroen Van Meeuwen]] added[3] that efforts are already underway to package Zimbra for Fedora. ...ve to Fedora was a technical decision based on the desire to adopt RPM for package management." Rahul followed up with more information on this development[3
    41 KB (5,935 words) - 10:41, 14 April 2009
  • | name = '''btrfs by default test week''' | image = [[File:test-days-banner.svg|300px|link=QA/Test Days]]
    86 KB (10,962 words) - 10:20, 19 November 2020
  • ...sion of Bodhi, the freeze of Rawhide and some essential reading on the new package keys. In Developments we shock you with "Non-X System Consoles to be Remove ...Fedora 8 and Fedora 9. "We're in the final stages of testing a few corner cases, and preparing the official builds of fedora-release, PackageKit, gnome-pac
    49 KB (7,014 words) - 08:16, 18 September 2016
  • projects and end up with both a trademarked package from upstream and a package in Fedora that meets our users needs. The recent thunderbird
    62 KB (10,855 words) - 08:06, 18 September 2016
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)