From Fedora Project Wiki

< QA‎ | Meetings

m (Add test results link)
m (Add meetbot summary link)
Line 11: Line 11:
= Agenda =
= Agenda =
* [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-February/088359.html Proposed meeting agenda]
* [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-February/088359.html Proposed meeting agenda]
* [FIXME meetbot summary]
* [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-08/fedora-qa.2010-02-08-16.02.html meetbot summary]


== Previous meeting follow-up ==
== Previous meeting follow-up ==

Revision as of 18:43, 8 February 2010

Attendees

People present (lines said)

Regrets:

Agenda

Previous meeting follow-up

  1. jlaska request zodbot tracking for updated F-13 QA RSS feeds (blocker bugs, common_bugs? etc...
  2. jlaska to organize a gobby meeting with wwoods+kparal to begin requirements/goal definition for a results db
    • wwoods and kparal were kind enough to take this on and a meeting is scheduled for tomorrow
  3. jlaska to discuss updating QA schedule with poelstra to reflect new 'release validation' focus
    • No updates yet
  4. jlaska and adamw to work on drafting a 'last known good' wiki page
    • jlaska discussed expectations with jkeating, need to clarify some terminology changes, but will activate this task shortly.

Rawhide Acceptance Testing

Last week, 2010-02-04 was the third pre-Alpha rawhide acceptance test milestone. Jkeating and dlehman coordinated to do a second compose (see rel-eng ticket#3337). Install images were built and posted on alt.fedoraproject.org. Since AutoQA doesn't yet monitor this location for new install images, tests were initiated manually.

Test Summary:

Next Steps:

  • Fix AutoQA post-tree-compose hook to monitor for RAT droppings (see ticket#115)
  • Discuss proposed rats_install changes with wwoods and draft a patch

Open issues:

  • At previous meeting, Jkeating asked what does 'last known good' (LKG) mean? - Does it mean that the install images and package source are good? Jlaska felt that for QA, it means here's we tested a particular install image and package set, and it was good. Adamw offered to help document this on the wiki, but asked for clarification/guidance once the mechanics have settled down.
  • Jlaska asked how do we know we're done with the 'last known good' (LKG) project?, Jkeating offered ...
   <Oxf13> in my head there is a simple webpage that is maintained by QA
   <Oxf13> this webpage describes Last Known Good and the fact that rawhide no
   longer has images of it's own
   <Oxf13> onthis page would be links to the install image files, and to the tree
   of packages it was found to be good with
   <Oxf13> with instructions on how to combine the two into an install
   <Oxf13> and finally notes that without picking a specific repo of packages, the
   images will attempt to install the latest repo of packages on the mirror system
   <Oxf13> which has not been validated, and may not work

AutoQA project update

Deps/conflicts prevention

Last week

This week

  • Build a testsuite to validate depchecks functionality (possibly using rpmfluff)

rpmguard and autoqa results collection

Last week

  • Address ticket#113 - skip checks against same package NVR
  • Address ticket#114 - locate latest previous package from stable and updates repos. Makes it easier to run the test manually at some future date.

This week

  • Initial brainstorming on results db ideas

install automation

Last week

  • Reviewing options for booting ISO media while using a kickstart (consulting kvm autotest and virt teams)

This week

packaging/deployment

Last week

  • Process akurtakov's feedback and remove all uncertain JAR files from the list (see User:Jlaska/gwt#Status_uncertain).
  • Initiated discussion with GWT upstream regarding multiple versioned JAR files (see thread).

This week

  • Package an existing JPackage for Fedora

Open discussion - <Your topic here>

Upcoming QA events

Action items

IRC transcript