UsingMultipleMPIs

From FedoraProject

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Imported from MoinMoin)
 
(Move MPI stuff from EdHill, replacing outdated information about lam)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Please edit system and help pages ONLY in the moinmaster wiki! For more
+
= Proposal for Improving MPI support in Fedora =
-->
+
<!-- information, please see MoinMaster:MoinPagesEditorGroup.
+
-->
+
<!--master-page:Unknown-Page
+
-->
+
<!--master-date:Unknown-Date
+
-->
+
<!--acl MoinPagesEditorGroup:read,write,delete,revert All:read
+
-->
+
== Using Multipe MPIs ==
+
There are currently two MPI implementations available: lam (from Fedora Core) and openmpi (from Fedora Extras).  However, due to runtime linking and common library and binary names, it can be tricky controlling which one you are using and any given time.
+
  
=== Example ===
+
Written by [[EdHill]].
 +
 
 +
== Observation ==
 +
 
 +
People are increasingly using MPI to solve scientific and engineering problems.  While its still a niche market, its steadily growing.  Networks of workstations and small clusters have become quite common.  And cheaper computers is only making it more common.
 +
 
 +
== Goal ==
 +
 
 +
It would be nice to provide a few different MPI implementations which can be installed with a single command
 
<pre>
 
<pre>
xxx
+
yum install mpich2 openmpi ...
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 +
and then operate them side-by-side without worries about conflicts.  In my opinion, there are no good reasons why Fedora users should be "stuck" with LAM and forced to fight with from-source builds for other MPI implementations.  We easily ''can'' and therefore ''should'' do better!
 +
 +
== Proposal ==
 +
 +
On a large number sites (ranging from "supercomputing centres" right through through medium and small cluster installs), admins have adopted the "modules" or [http://modules.sourceforge.net/ environment-modules]  software to easily and gracefully handle situations with multiple simultaneous installs of various compilers and/or libraries.  The environment-modules system has proven itself to be a solid, general, workable, and extensible framework.  While I don't suggest that Fedora (or even Fedora Extras) adopt environment-modules wholesale for all sorts of problems, the simultaneous installation of multiple MPI implementations is a situation that just '' '''begs''' '' for an environment-modules solution.
 +
 +
The alternatives approach suggested by others is, in my opinion, clearly inferior to environment-modules since:
 +
 +
* where does one put the man pages for each implementation?
 +
* the alternatives setup is NOT easily extended to multiple different compilers
 +
* alternatives has the concept of one implementation being preferred to all others and this is unnecessary/pointless in the context of multiple MPI implementations
 +
 +
With the recent addition of environment-modules to Fedora Extras, I'd like to see it used to solve the current multiple-MPI-implementations deadlock.
  
=== Display ===
+
[[Category:SciTech SIG]]
xxx
+

Revision as of 15:40, 20 June 2011

Contents

Proposal for Improving MPI support in Fedora

Written by EdHill.

Observation

People are increasingly using MPI to solve scientific and engineering problems. While its still a niche market, its steadily growing. Networks of workstations and small clusters have become quite common. And cheaper computers is only making it more common.

Goal

It would be nice to provide a few different MPI implementations which can be installed with a single command

yum install mpich2 openmpi ...

and then operate them side-by-side without worries about conflicts. In my opinion, there are no good reasons why Fedora users should be "stuck" with LAM and forced to fight with from-source builds for other MPI implementations. We easily can and therefore should do better!

Proposal

On a large number sites (ranging from "supercomputing centres" right through through medium and small cluster installs), admins have adopted the "modules" or environment-modules software to easily and gracefully handle situations with multiple simultaneous installs of various compilers and/or libraries. The environment-modules system has proven itself to be a solid, general, workable, and extensible framework. While I don't suggest that Fedora (or even Fedora Extras) adopt environment-modules wholesale for all sorts of problems, the simultaneous installation of multiple MPI implementations is a situation that just begs for an environment-modules solution.

The alternatives approach suggested by others is, in my opinion, clearly inferior to environment-modules since:

  • where does one put the man pages for each implementation?
  • the alternatives setup is NOT easily extended to multiple different compilers
  • alternatives has the concept of one implementation being preferred to all others and this is unnecessary/pointless in the context of multiple MPI implementations

With the recent addition of environment-modules to Fedora Extras, I'd like to see it used to solve the current multiple-MPI-implementations deadlock.