From Fedora Project Wiki
29 August 2010
- 10:0510:05, 29 August 2010 diff hist 0 Buildroot override SOP →Periodic cleanup: bash loop does not work for fedora branched (f14)
- 10:0410:04, 29 August 2010 diff hist −1 m Buildroot override SOP →Periodic cleanup: fix wiki syntax
- 10:0210:02, 29 August 2010 diff hist +209 Buildroot override SOP →Periodic cleanup: mention fedora branched difference
- 09:4809:48, 29 August 2010 diff hist 0 Buildroot override SOP →Periodic cleanup: update bash loop to f12..f14
28 August 2010
- 21:2521:25, 28 August 2010 diff hist −21 Board →Introduction: fix wiki linking
25 August 2010
- 14:0414:04, 25 August 2010 diff hist −6 Package maintenance guide remove --add from git config: I was told that --add with push.default does not make any sense
23 August 2010
- 19:3619:36, 23 August 2010 diff hist +46 Upstream release monitoring →H - M: add john
22 August 2010
- 12:2112:21, 22 August 2010 diff hist +108 Legal talk:FPCA add one more remark about the email address
- 12:1612:16, 22 August 2010 diff hist +357 N Legal talk:FPCA add some remarks
20 August 2010
- 21:2621:26, 20 August 2010 diff hist −145 Bodhi →Karma requirements for Critical Path updates: fix wiki linking, simplify karma requirements
- 21:1621:16, 20 August 2010 diff hist −48 Bodhi →Questions and Answers: direct pushes to stable require FESCo permission for all packages
- 21:0621:06, 20 August 2010 diff hist +18 Package update acceptance criteria →Updates to 'important' packages: "important" packages actually require a net karma sum of two and not only two +1
19 August 2010
- 19:3319:33, 19 August 2010 diff hist −199 Architectures/ARM →Fedora ARM Repositories: F12 arm SRPMS have vanished
- 19:2919:29, 19 August 2010 diff hist +57 User:Till add ohloh profile
15 August 2010
- 17:5117:51, 15 August 2010 diff hist +123 Join the package collection maintainers →Get a Fedora Account: mention to upload a public SSH key
13 August 2010
- 15:5115:51, 13 August 2010 diff hist +497 Fedora Engineering Services →How do I get help?: there are no components for FES in trac, make issue tracker info more verbose current
- 15:3415:34, 13 August 2010 diff hist +28 Fedora Engineering Services:Join →Requirements: add at least one link back to the main FES page current
6 August 2010
- 07:2207:22, 6 August 2010 diff hist +126 Package maintenance guide →Commands: clarify tagging for a successfull fedpkg build
13 July 2010
- 21:1321:13, 13 July 2010 diff hist −562 Fedora Easy Karma →Example Output: update example run, too
- 21:0521:05, 13 July 2010 diff hist +11 m Proven tester →Feedback procedures: f-e-k --critpath-only shows only _unapproved_ critpath updates
11 July 2010
- 10:4810:48, 11 July 2010 diff hist +132 Category:Package Maintainers/Review Template add some links to external templates
9 July 2010
- 18:2718:27, 9 July 2010 diff hist +49 m User:Kevin/Review Template add to category Package Maintainers/Review Template current
- 17:5817:58, 9 July 2010 diff hist +9,106 N User:Till/Package Review Checklist add my checklist
- 17:5217:52, 9 July 2010 diff hist +50 m Spots Review Cheat Sheet add to category Package Maintainers/Review Template current
8 July 2010
- 14:2314:23, 8 July 2010 diff hist +294 Talk:Critical path package uses cases of comps groups current
- 11:5911:59, 8 July 2010 diff hist +240 Talk:Critical path package →Critical Path Comps Groups: propose move to archive space of the redundant page, ask about comps
6 July 2010
- 22:0922:09, 6 July 2010 diff hist +1,147 N User:Till/Package Monkey Special Interest Group Proposal some initial content current
4 July 2010
- 08:4408:44, 4 July 2010 diff hist +900 Talk:Critical path package since the comps groups are mentioned on two pages, also add the objection to using the core comps group for critical path here
- 08:3308:33, 4 July 2010 diff hist −1 m Talk:Critical Path Packages Proposal →Critical Patch Comps Groups: typofix current
- 08:3108:31, 4 July 2010 diff hist +580 Talk:Critical Path Packages Proposal using the core group as a critical path group is bad and unintuitive
2 July 2010
- 22:5622:56, 2 July 2010 diff hist −18 Package Review Process →Review Process: do not use "here" as a link text
- 20:1620:16, 2 July 2010 diff hist −63 Getting a Fedora package in EPEL →The procedure for getting a package in EPEL: just link to the bug in a Package change request when the maintainer did not repsond or is not interested
- 20:0720:07, 2 July 2010 diff hist −3 Package update acceptance criteria →All other updates: move admonition to the beginning like it is done in the other sections
- 20:0620:06, 2 July 2010 diff hist −31 Package update acceptance criteria →Updates to 'important' packages: adjust the style of the rules to the one for all other updates
- 20:0020:00, 2 July 2010 diff hist +4 m Package update acceptance criteria →Updates to 'important' packages: enhance wording to show that enough karma does not mean the update goes directly stable
- 19:5919:59, 2 July 2010 diff hist +4 m Package update acceptance criteria →Updates to 'important' packages: link proventester
- 19:5919:59, 2 July 2010 diff hist −99 Package update acceptance criteria →Updates to 'important' packages: merge karma sentences
- 19:5319:53, 2 July 2010 diff hist +2 m Package update acceptance criteria →Criteria common to all updates: sync wording with outer admonition regarding implementation status
30 June 2010
- 15:1415:14, 30 June 2010 diff hist −439 How to get sponsored into the packager group →Sponsorship model: review swaps are not possible for unsponsored review request submitters, moved to Package_Review_Process#Contributor
- 15:1315:13, 30 June 2010 diff hist +19 m How to get sponsored into the packager group →Sponsorship model: link to Fedora Account
- 15:1115:11, 30 June 2010 diff hist +6 m How to get sponsored into the packager group →Sponsorship model: linkt to Package_Review_Process
- 15:0815:08, 30 June 2010 diff hist +33 m How to get sponsored into the packager group →Sponsorship model: link to How_to_communicate_using_IRC
- 15:0415:04, 30 June 2010 diff hist 0 m Package Review Process bump revision
- 15:0415:04, 30 June 2010 diff hist +109 How to get sponsored into the packager group →Sponsorship model: review swaps are not possible for unsponsored review request submitters, moved to Package_Review_Process#Contributor
- 15:0315:03, 30 June 2010 diff hist +85 Package Review Process →Contributor: link to How to get sponsored into the packager group
- 15:0015:00, 30 June 2010 diff hist +475 Package Review Process →Review Process: mention review swaps
- 14:4914:49, 30 June 2010 diff hist −146 How to get sponsored into the packager group →Sponsorship model: afaik the "request sponsorship" link in FAS has been removed and sponsors do everything for sponsorees
- 14:4714:47, 30 June 2010 diff hist +500 Talk:How to get sponsored into the packager group answer questions current
30 May 2010
- 11:3111:31, 30 May 2010 diff hist −4 Upstream release monitoring →N - Z: fix DBD-MySQL
- 11:2311:23, 30 May 2010 diff hist −24 Upstream release monitoring →H - M: fix m17n-*