Search results

(11:02:22 AM) abadger1999: I like davej's messages. (11:02:31 AM) nirik: yeah, davej's messages rock... ...

* nirik would like to hear davej's rebuttal. ;) <bpepple> Is there are technical reason why davej is reluctant to follow the guidelines? ...

0:47 < spot> | well, both me and davej agree that fedora kernels have no abi 0:49 < spot> | but you'd have to get davej onboard to add things to his kernel package, right? ...

(11:02:50) jwb: we've got davej and dwmw2 saying they should die in Extras and Core all together ...wb: which i realize is confusing because kmods already exist... where were davej and dwmw2 when kmods originated? ...

* davej-kernel <tr id="t14:20"><th class="nick" style="background: #4d4d93"> davej</th><td class="text" style="color: #4d4d93">wwoods: and buy it again when w ...

15:30 < skvidal> mmcgrath: have you read davej's comments on the subject? :) 15:34 < dgilmore> warren: im not dismissing that just that kvm will make davej happier ...

...d="t13:40"><td class="action" colspan="2">* f13 is quite a bit scared that davej is out this week at OSCON.</td><td><a href="#t13:40" class="time">13:40</a> ...nd: #488888"> warren</th><td class="text" style="color: #488888">f13, with davej gone, do we have anyone authorized to make changes to the kernel before tes ...

(10:21:29) warren: Likely the only problem we will have is davej and dwmw2 will demand that you reproduce kernel bugs without tainting modul (10:25:12) warren: I understand why dwmw2 and davej feel this way, but I think they are overreacting. The restrictions on kmod ...

...as changed the topic to: FESCo-Meeting -- MISC -- kernel-naming - What did davej find out about this? <tibbs> Several of us talked about it with davej there. ...

...as changed the topic to: FESCo-Meeting -- MISC -- kernel-naming - What did davej find out about this? <jwb> jeremy, did davej ever get back to us? ...

<nirik> I think this is waiting to hear back from davej, right? and he's going to talk to linus/alan? last I heard, davej has not reported back from his fact finding mission ...

| 32 || [[User:DaveJones|DaveJ]] || || || M (pre-baconator) || ...

...d: #488888"> warren</th><td class="text" style="color: #488888">Do we need davej?</td><td class="time"><a href="#t13:07" class="time">13:07</a></td></tr> ...8144"> jwb</th><td class="text" style="color: #818144">when do we not need davej?</td><td class="time"><a href="#t13:07" class="time">13:07</a></td></tr> ...

[[User:Davej|Dave Jones]]<br/> ...

<abadger1999> nirik: davej posted that fc6->f7 would cause issues. ...

...rren> | * Theoretical debate going on whether this is a good idea or not. davej gave the example of stable/devel kernel branches that became only one branc 21:34 < mspevack> | and for the record, davej sucks. because the kernel sucks :) ...

Nov 13 10:36:58 <gregdek> DaveJ: "Security folks are also tracking stuff somewhat in Core." Nov 13 11:45:53 <warren> davej: There will be a kernel ...

| style="color: #407a40" | airlied was just building a kernel and davej has one kernel build thats newer than what is currently tagged for beta, I' ...

| style="color: #854685" | but last time, we had folks like notting and davej sit in on our talk and offer really useful insight too. ...

(11:19:41) thl: f13, but davej is not going to maintain a stable abi afaik ...