From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- 4 KB (629 words) - 22:34, 2 June 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Archive talk:PackagingDrafts/KernelModulesWithKverInName]]70 bytes (5 words) - 21:01, 21 February 2009
- I suggest this is merged with [[PackagingDrafts/Symlinks]].218 bytes (29 words) - 07:17, 10 February 2009
- 3 KB (524 words) - 09:44, 30 May 2009
- 1,022 bytes (138 words) - 01:50, 3 June 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Dos2unix]]46 bytes (5 words) - 18:49, 15 September 2009
- 514 bytes (85 words) - 15:43, 24 August 2011
- 4 KB (620 words) - 15:30, 2 September 2014
- 31 bytes (4 words) - 18:42, 15 June 2008
- 2 KB (244 words) - 16:49, 22 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/LibtoolArchives]]53 bytes (4 words) - 18:51, 27 February 2009
- 1 KB (195 words) - 20:49, 21 February 2009
- 8 KB (1,110 words) - 11:46, 3 December 2015
- 640 bytes (74 words) - 09:38, 31 March 2012
- 173 bytes (28 words) - 20:07, 21 February 2009
- ...PKCS#11 provider explicitly specified. See [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Pkcs11Support#How_to_specify_a_specific_smart_card.2FHSM the PKCS#11 packag2 KB (233 words) - 08:15, 16 December 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/DesktopFiles]]50 bytes (4 words) - 21:33, 21 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive talk:PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl]]52 bytes (5 words) - 20:00, 21 February 2009
- 5 KB (811 words) - 20:00, 21 February 2009
- 1 KB (188 words) - 22:22, 19 August 2009
- 141 bytes (24 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 19:52, 21 June 2018
- 431 bytes (64 words) - 03:00, 27 February 2009
- 12 KB (1,914 words) - 20:07, 14 October 2016
- 3 KB (390 words) - 00:55, 14 November 2008
- 52 bytes (6 words) - 12:09, 2 June 2009
- 2 KB (278 words) - 03:46, 1 October 2010
- 8 KB (1,197 words) - 08:50, 13 February 2014
- 227 bytes (37 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/RubyGem with C code]]57 bytes (7 words) - 18:22, 27 February 2009
- 57 bytes (7 words) - 12:10, 2 June 2009
- 1 KB (186 words) - 04:17, 25 November 2008
- 14 KB (2,087 words) - 12:35, 26 September 2010
- 24 KB (3,702 words) - 17:57, 13 February 2017
- 3 KB (466 words) - 01:36, 11 July 2010
- 227 bytes (37 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- 143 bytes (23 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- 20 KB (3,080 words) - 22:24, 10 December 2011
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Icon Cache]]48 bytes (5 words) - 00:34, 11 March 2009
- 11 KB (1,727 words) - 17:43, 2 July 2015
- 3 KB (545 words) - 11:56, 13 January 2012
- 25 KB (3,875 words) - 21:22, 17 October 2016
- 398 bytes (57 words) - 18:53, 11 February 2010
- 2 KB (368 words) - 00:53, 14 November 2008
- 48 bytes (4 words) - 04:32, 21 December 2008
- #REDIRECT [[User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/NodeDOTjs]]52 bytes (5 words) - 20:08, 14 October 2016
- 227 bytes (37 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- 1 KB (240 words) - 16:25, 15 August 2013
- See [[Talk:PackagingDrafts/Duplicate Files]] for discussion.491 bytes (69 words) - 00:45, 27 February 2009
- 15 KB (1,697 words) - 13:26, 12 May 2009
- 154 bytes (22 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- 688 bytes (104 words) - 07:49, 18 September 2016
- 6 KB (1,001 words) - 17:58, 13 February 2017
- 19 KB (2,921 words) - 19:28, 14 October 2016
- 2 KB (244 words) - 00:34, 11 March 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets/iconcache]]65 bytes (5 words) - 18:48, 27 February 2009
- ...ll to <code>%{_assetdir}</code>. For more information, see [[User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/Web Assets|the Web Assets guidelines]]. JavaScript code is included as part of the general [[User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/Web Assets|Web Assets framework]]. Therefore, <code>%{_jsdir}</code> is av9 KB (1,410 words) - 19:01, 21 October 2013
- 1 KB (170 words) - 17:11, 8 March 2023
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/BLAS LAPACK]]41 bytes (4 words) - 14:56, 7 June 2020
- 7 KB (986 words) - 17:31, 18 January 2022
- ...nder these guidelines. JavaScript packages must follow the [[User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/JavaScript|JavaScript guidelines]] in addition to these guidelines. ...been bundled along with web applications up to this point. [[User:Patches/PackagingDrafts/JavaScript#Rationale|There are a lot of good reasons why we shouldn't bundl5 KB (818 words) - 18:59, 21 October 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/ReviewGuideline for fonts (2009-01-22)]]76 bytes (8 words) - 18:53, 27 February 2009
- 2 KB (363 words) - 18:23, 27 February 2009
- 68 bytes (8 words) - 19:04, 14 November 2009
- 3 KB (490 words) - 09:55, 2 October 2018
- 9 KB (1,367 words) - 07:49, 18 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Archive talk:PackagingDrafts/ReviewGuideline for fonts (2009-01-22)]]81 bytes (9 words) - 18:53, 27 February 2009
- 11 KB (1,781 words) - 17:17, 28 April 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/RubyGem with C code]]57 bytes (7 words) - 18:22, 27 February 2009
- 1 KB (214 words) - 18:53, 27 February 2009
- 4 KB (608 words) - 08:54, 18 September 2016
- 4 KB (750 words) - 09:24, 7 March 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/RubyGem with C code spot]]62 bytes (8 words) - 18:23, 27 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Fonts packaging automation (2008-11-18)]]77 bytes (8 words) - 02:47, 25 February 2009
- 12 KB (1,835 words) - 11:20, 15 June 2017
- 4 KB (615 words) - 09:31, 7 March 2014
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/Packaging font bundles (2008-07-04)]]65 bytes (7 words) - 17:49, 7 December 2008
- 1 KB (218 words) - 23:28, 22 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/No bundling of fonts in other packages (2008-07-24)]]81 bytes (11 words) - 17:50, 7 December 2008
- 2 KB (251 words) - 09:28, 26 October 2017
- 16 KB (2,354 words) - 13:45, 17 May 2023
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 03:08, 25 May 2008
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/Packaging font bundles (2008-07-04)]]65 bytes (7 words) - 02:58, 21 December 2008
- 62 bytes (7 words) - 20:08, 22 February 2009
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 03:14, 25 May 2008
- It is a follow-up on [[PackagingDrafts/Fonts spec template correction (fontconfig)]], discussed by [[FPC]] on [[Pa ...c right now complemented by the new directories proposed in the approved [[PackagingDrafts/Fonts spec template correction (fontconfig)]] (as per FPC suggestion).7 KB (1,013 words) - 02:47, 25 February 2009
- 589 bytes (82 words) - 18:01, 20 February 2009
- 269 bytes (44 words) - 07:41, 5 July 2010
- 152 bytes (23 words) - 11:34, 13 January 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2009-01-13)]]70 bytes (8 words) - 02:39, 25 February 2009
- 437 bytes (74 words) - 18:44, 15 September 2009
- 4 KB (554 words) - 17:21, 19 May 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Fonts packaging automation (2008-11-18)]]77 bytes (8 words) - 02:47, 25 February 2009
- 54 bytes (6 words) - 00:49, 19 February 2016
- ...idn't try hard enough to achieve distribution-wide naming consistency. A [[PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2009-01-13)|more ambitious and invasive proposal]] was ...ng packages that fail this stricter rule will wait for the corresponding [[PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages|policy]] to be finalised. In the meanwhile getting new pac4 KB (586 words) - 02:43, 25 February 2009
- 5 KB (753 words) - 18:44, 15 September 2009
- ...sorship should comment other review requests to show, that they know the [[PackagingDrafts/Containers|Container Guidelines]]. <li> Go through the MUST items listed in [[PackagingDrafts/Containers|Container Guidelines]].22 KB (3,584 words) - 20:02, 2 October 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Removal of pre-built binaries]]67 bytes (7 words) - 19:05, 14 November 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/RPMMacros sharedstatedir optflags and admonitions]]87 bytes (8 words) - 17:21, 19 May 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2009-01-13)]]70 bytes (8 words) - 02:39, 25 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Fonts packaging automation (2008-11-18)]]77 bytes (8 words) - 02:47, 25 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Removal of pre-built binaries]]67 bytes (7 words) - 18:44, 15 September 2009
- This proposal is a follow-up and replacement for the [[PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2008-12-22)|naming rules]] rejected by FPC on [[Packag ...xisting packages that fail this new rule will wait for the corresponding [[PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages|policy]] to be finalised, or for a specific FPC exception.5 KB (584 words) - 02:39, 25 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive talk:PackagingDrafts/Removal of pre-built binaries]]72 bytes (8 words) - 18:44, 15 September 2009
- 3 KB (488 words) - 22:02, 17 September 2016
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Font package naming (2008-12-22)]]70 bytes (8 words) - 02:43, 25 February 2009
- 2 KB (342 words) - 17:53, 7 December 2008
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/Gem expand stage change]]53 bytes (6 words) - 16:46, 18 June 2009
- 6 KB (889 words) - 16:30, 18 August 2010
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Font package splitting rules (2008-12-21)]]79 bytes (9 words) - 02:38, 25 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:PackagingDrafts/Absolute symlinks in fonts templates (2009-01-02)]]87 bytes (10 words) - 18:16, 27 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/Fonts spec template correction: fontconfig (2008-10-12)]]85 bytes (9 words) - 02:57, 21 December 2008
- 4 KB (580 words) - 02:38, 25 February 2009
- 3 KB (395 words) - 18:16, 27 February 2009
- 453 bytes (66 words) - 07:48, 18 September 2016
- 491 bytes (67 words) - 16:27, 12 May 2016
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/Fonts spec template correction: fontconfig (2008-10-12)]]85 bytes (9 words) - 02:57, 21 December 2008
- 3 KB (343 words) - 17:54, 7 December 2008
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/Fonts spec template correction: fontconfig (2008-10-12)]]85 bytes (9 words) - 17:54, 7 December 2008
- 2 KB (298 words) - 14:13, 20 October 2011
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 03:16, 25 May 2008