2016-05-16 Workstation Graphical Upgrade

Fedora Test Day

Workstation Graphical Upgrade

Date	2016-05-16
Time	all day

Website	QA/Test Days
IRC	#fedora-test-day (webirc)
Mailing list	test

Can't make the date?
If you come to this page before or after the test day is completed, your testing is still valuable, and you can use the information on this page to test, file any bugs you find at Bugzilla, and add your results to the results section. If this page is more than a month old when you arrive here, please check the current schedule and see if a similar but more recent Test Day is planned or has already happened.

What to test?[edit]

Today's installment of Fedora Test Day will focus on upgrading from Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 Workstation with Gnome-software

Who's available?[edit]

The following cast of characters will be available for testing, workarounds, bug fixes, and general discussion ...

Development - Richard Hughes (hughsie), Matthias Clasen (mclasen)
Quality Assurance - Petr Schindler (pschindl), Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantro), Kamil Páral (kparal)

Prerequisites for Test Day[edit]

A fully updated Fedora 23 Workstation installation, either on bare metal or in VM (please make sure you have no important data on that installation, things might go wrong -- don't do this on your production machine!)
Enough free space on HDD

How to test?[edit]

Follow the instructions from QA:Testcase_Workstation_Graphical_Upgrade.

Furthermore, try to explore and test different approaches and/or edge cases (for example, what happens if you don't have enough free disk space?).

Reporting bugs[edit]

If you have problems with any of the tests, have a look at the list of reported bugs in Bugzilla and in the results page. If you don't see it, please a new bug to Bugzilla, probably against gnome-software component. Add bug 1308538 to the Blocks: field. If you are unsure about exactly how to file the report or what other information to include, just ask on IRC #fedora-test-day or #fedora-qa and we will help you.

Test Results[edit]

Tests[edit]

User	Profile	Testcase Workstation Graphical Upgrade	References
Akashray	Fedora 23	pass ^[1]	↑ Thanks Sumantro for mentoring
Akshitlinux	Fedora 23	pass ^[1]	↑ Took more time than usual to update. I was on 2 mb/s speed still downloading update stopped couple of times in between.
AmySt.	Fedora 23	pass
Andrew	Fedora 23	pass
AnilKul	Fedora 23	pass
Anisha	Fedora 23 Mem 2GB oracle VBox	pass ^[1]	↑ Works
Ankita	Fedora 23 on VM ware	pass
BikramUTD	Fedora 23 on VM with 8GB RAM	pass
Buvanesh Kumar	Fedora 23	pass
Gauravrootlove	Fedora 23	pass ^[1]	↑ It took just too long , everything looks awesome. Kudos to Sumantro for the blog and detailed procedure.
Graphikev	VM VirtualBox (Fedora 23 Host) - Core i5 - 1GB RAM (VM)/4GB RAM (Host)	fail ^[1]	↑ Dialog window during download : Sorry, that didn't work.
Jain Lavana	Fedora 23 on VM manager with 2GB RAM and 20GB , 30mb/s network	pass ^[1]	↑ This was my first test day and I would like to know more about Fedora events.Thanks Sumantro Mukherjee for helping me out with his time and patience.
Ravi Sekhar	Fedora 23	pass
Renault	Fedora 23 on VirtualBox	pass ^[1]	↑ Very slow after downloading before ask to reboot. Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)...
Saket	Fedora 23 on VM manager	pass
Sanket	Fedora 23	pass
SreeparnaNK	Fedora 23	pass ^[1]	↑ blog helped.
Vishal	Fedora 23 on Boxes	pass
aernhart	F23 on Dell Inspiron 3520	pass ^[1]	↑ Only a minor thing: During the download, in the Software app, the Installed tab shows the word "Installing" whereas the Updates tab shows "Downloading Fedora 24". Maybe the Installed tab should also use the word "Downloading"? (But I like the progress bar along the button in the Installed tab.) I think someone else mentioned that it would be nice to see more detailed progress info, just to comfort the user that the d/l didn't get silently stuck or hung. Upon post-upgrade reboot, Gnome Notification center showed that OS was updated, clicking on it => List of installed updates.
ankursinha	http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha	warn ^[1] pass ^[2]	↑ RHBZ #1335414 The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though - looks like the bug that Kamil has filed already. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues. ↑ The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.
anubhav ranjan	Fedora 23 x86_x64	pass
bhitier	fedora 23	fail ^[1]	↑ no ~/.cache/gnome-software/3.20/upgrades/fedora.json present on my pc after rebbot
coremodule	F23 to F24	pass ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1335458 Very slow, but does work. Did not prompt for root password when upgrade was started.
desubham	Fedora 23 workstn	pass ^[1]	↑ very helpful,I learn lot today
devonjspace-bugzilla		pass ^[1]	↑ Went well, no issues noted that was not already listed other than src was not connected at the start for the testing repo. Not really a deal at all I think.
divyaU	Fedora 23	pass
ffranz		fail ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1335414 We need more visual indication folks, both for the packages download in Software and also for packages installation after restarting. Apart that good job, looks promising!
frantisekz	Fedora 23 (QEMU)	warn ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1336435
harethz	Fedora 23 Fedora 23 on virt manager with 3 GB RAM and 60GB .	pass ^[1]	↑ 1- no issues 2- It took just too long, 3 hours , everything work perfectly , 3- quote "Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)... " its my first time
juliuxpigface	Fedora 23 (Qemu-Kvm guest)	warn ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1335414 RHBZ #1336404
kparal		fail ^[1] fail ^[2] warn ^[3] fail ^[4] fail ^[5] fail ^[6] fail ^[7]	↑ RHBZ #1336530 ↑ RHBZ #1336459 ↑ RHBZ #1336404 ↑ RHBZ #1336400 ↑ RHBZ #1336383 ↑ RHBZ #1335458 RHBZ #1335463 ↑ RHBZ #1335414
ksubrahm	Fedora23	pass ^[1]	↑ LGTM
me2	fedora 23	warn ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1336442
modderj	Fedora 23	pass
patrikopravil	Fedora 23 HW	pass
patrikopravil	Fedora 23 Virtual Box	fail ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1335414 RHBZ #[[rhbug:\|]] 1. #1335414 Broke packages and didnt noticed me.
pnemade	Fedora 23	pass ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1335414 RHBZ #1336442 RHBZ #1336477 RHBZ #1336482
prakashmishra1598	fedora 23	pass
pschindl	Fedora 23	fail ^[1]	↑ RHBZ #1336436
rahuldecoded	Fedora23. Vmware(2 GBRAM) and Host(4GB RAM)	pass ^[1]	↑ With using this blog http://sumantrom.blogspot.in/2016/05/workstation-graphical-upgrade-from.html . It became a calkwalk for me. :)
ronw	Virtualbox VM 5.0.20 (Arch Linux host)	pass
rootmenow	Fedora 23	pass ^[1]	↑ Slow but works good
satellit	NUC i5 16 gb memory (QEMU/kvm 30 GB 2048) used http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/live-respins/F23-x86_64-WORK-20160512.iso	pass
sumantrom	Fedora 23	pass
xenonese	Fedora 23 x68 x64 workstation on boxes	pass ^[1]	↑ Very slow but nothing seems broken. "Learn more" button works too.

[1] Thanks Sumantro for mentoring

[2] Took more time than usual to update. I was on 2 mb/s speed still downloading update stopped couple of times in between.

[3] Works

[4] It took just too long , everything looks awesome. Kudos to Sumantro for the blog and detailed procedure.

[5] Dialog window during download : Sorry, that didn't work.

[6] This was my first test day and I would like to know more about Fedora events.Thanks Sumantro Mukherjee for helping me out with his time and patience.

[7] Very slow after downloading before ask to reboot. Needs probably to display more info: download rate, number of packet, a percentage, the actual processing (downloading, preparing, installing, configuring)...

[8] .

[9] Only a minor thing: During the download, in the Software app, the Installed tab shows the word "Installing" whereas the Updates tab shows "Downloading Fedora 24". Maybe the Installed tab should also use the word "Downloading"? (But I like the progress bar along the button in the Installed tab.) I think someone else mentioned that it would be nice to see more detailed progress info, just to comfort the user that the d/l didn't get silently stuck or hung. Upon post-upgrade reboot, Gnome Notification center showed that OS was updated, clicking on it => List of installed updates.

[10] RHBZ #1335414 The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though - looks like the bug that Kamil has filed already. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.

[11] The upgrade went fine. Initially, after enabling the copr, logging out and back in, gnome-software threw up a notification. On opening the app and clicking on "download", though, it threw an error - didn't give any details, though. I restarted and then it worked OK. The upgrade went OK - showed the percentage in the top left corner. Then it rebooted and everything seems OK now. The wiki page says it should notify the user about broken packages, but it didn't seem to tell me anything. I had vlc etc. from RPMFusion installed, and they're broken for F24 - they're not on the system any more, so I assume --allowerasing or something similar is enabled. The rest looks good - nothing broken, no real issues.

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

[1]

Search

Test Day:2016-05-16 Workstation Graphical Upgrade

Contents