From Fedora Project Wiki

Results 1 - 644 of 644
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

There is a page named "EPEL" on this wiki. See also the other search results found.

Page title matches

  • = EPEL Steering Committee = ...lly an EPEL Steering Committee was formed by FESCo as a governing body for EPEL. This committee consisted of seven members
    5 KB (773 words) - 19:01, 20 February 2019
  • ...ht find this useful in cases where, for example, your employer is using an EPEL package in their infrastructure. In such a case, it is your duty to your e '''EPEL Package Maintainer'''
    3 KB (413 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • {{admon/caution|This is a caution|This SOP is obsolete. EPEL pushes are done the same way now that Fedora ones are done.}}
    124 bytes (23 words) - 20:42, 29 March 2015
  • = About EPEL = EPEL was started because many Fedora contributors wanted to use the Fedora packa
    5 KB (850 words) - 13:29, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/Schedule]]
    27 bytes (3 words) - 20:41, 26 May 2008
  • == EPEL for Contributors == ...ption| maintaining EPEL packages as part of a job]]. More details in the [[EPEL/FAQ#Contributing_to_EPEL| FAQ entry on contributing]].
    1 KB (184 words) - 13:19, 28 June 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies]]
    40 bytes (3 words) - 20:42, 26 May 2008
  • == EPEL für Beitragende == * [[EPEL SIG| EPEL Spezialinteressensgruppe (SIG)]] - betreibt EPEL
    836 bytes (117 words) - 04:21, 4 March 2009
  • Linux releases. When EPEL was started, RHEL lifetimes were 5 years and packagers in EPEL were bound to support software longer than RHEL did
    3 KB (408 words) - 17:47, 13 February 2019
  • = EPEL SIG Meetings = The EPEL SIG meeting are open for everyone and held each week on Friday in #epel at 17:00 UTC. Due to the fact that different parts of the world go on dayli
    1 KB (253 words) - 19:30, 21 November 2014
  • <!-- page was renamed from SIGs/EPEL ...s as simple as having a love for Enterprise Linux and participating in the EPEL SIG.
    2 KB (295 words) - 14:19, 23 September 2014
  • == Mit EPEL anfangen == * [[de_DE/EPEL/Über| Über]]
    794 bytes (112 words) - 04:09, 4 March 2009
  • = EPEL verstehen = == Was ist EPEL? ==
    6 KB (969 words) - 22:04, 2 June 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/AskForFedoraPackageInEPEL]]
    52 bytes (4 words) - 00:37, 3 November 2008
  • = Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) = Welcome to the home of the EPEL Special Interest Group.
    8 KB (1,184 words) - 19:49, 22 May 2019
  • = Packaging Guidelines and Policies for EPEL = The packages in EPEL follow the Fedora Packaging and Maintenance Guidelines --
    13 KB (2,109 words) - 18:27, 17 May 2018
  • == EPEL SysV Initscripts == ...es for SysV-style Initscripts, for use and inclusion in EPEL 5/6 packages. EPEL 7 and newer MUST provide systemd units and follow the appropriate [[Packagi
    28 KB (4,184 words) - 11:44, 9 February 2017
  • == What is EPEL? == EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) is a volunteer-based community effort
    22 KB (3,581 words) - 14:08, 25 July 2018
  • == PPC64LE EPEL 7 == and epel7 source packages list getting [http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/ here]
    21 KB (2,584 words) - 14:11, 7 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 13:46, 12 March 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/CommunicationPlan]]
    44 bytes (4 words) - 18:41, 30 October 2008
  • == The procedure for getting a package in EPEL == Otherwise, if you'd like to see a Fedora package in EPEL that is not yet available, check Fedora's [ https://src.fedoraproject.org/
    3 KB (587 words) - 20:15, 7 December 2018
  • #REDIRECT [[Getting a Fedora package in EPEL]]
    46 bytes (7 words) - 02:54, 21 December 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Getting a Fedora package in EPEL]]
    46 bytes (7 words) - 12:07, 2 November 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL Pushing Infrastructure SOP]]
    45 bytes (5 words) - 19:53, 17 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/SteeringCommittee/MeetingTimeMatrix]]
    62 bytes (5 words) - 04:13, 26 February 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL Steering Committee]]
    37 bytes (4 words) - 03:48, 4 March 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[About EPEL]]
    24 bytes (3 words) - 03:56, 4 March 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List]]
    44 bytes (6 words) - 10:49, 24 March 2019
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL SIG]]
    22 bytes (3 words) - 04:18, 4 March 2009
  • ...ut should any conflicts occur, these guidelines should take precedence (on EPEL packages). As a reminder, these guidelines only apply to EPEL packages, not to Fedora packages.
    14 KB (2,046 words) - 19:42, 17 January 2019
  • | colspan="2" | *** The channel topic is "EPEL meeting - who's here?". | style="color: #407a40" | biggest epel meeting all year :)
    41 KB (5,312 words) - 21:59, 27 March 2009
  • Incompatible version upgrades in EPEL are to be avoided. However, in certain situations, they are unavoidable. .../lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ epel-devel] with details of the proposed upgrade. Include items such as the CVE
    3 KB (411 words) - 18:31, 1 March 2017
  • <!-- page was renamed from SIGs/EPEL
    3 KB (169 words) - 00:21, 30 September 2010
  • == New EPEL packages for EL-6 ==
    258 bytes (30 words) - 15:06, 6 May 2010
  • 0 bytes (0 words) - 06:16, 7 May 2010
  • == EPEL への貢献 ==
    2 KB (97 words) - 13:42, 9 July 2010
  • =EPEL= ...になります。Fedora は RHEL のアップストリームであり、EPEL のアドオンパッケージは主に RHEL 向けにビルドされた Fe
    3 KB (258 words) - 05:09, 8 September 2016
  • = EPEL とは=
    8 KB (82 words) - 13:29, 9 July 2010
  • == EPEL とは何? == ...になります。Fedora は RHEL のアップストリームであり、EPEL のアドオンパッケージは主に RHEL 向けにビルドされた Fe
    30 KB (784 words) - 00:11, 31 August 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List/ja]]
    47 bytes (7 words) - 22:39, 28 March 2017
  • = EPEL パッケージメンテナの一般的な作業内容 = ...ません。例えば、あなたの雇用主は自社のインフラで EPEL パッケージを使用しています。そのような状況で、何が
    4 KB (30 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • = EPEL 運営委員会 = ...活動して多くの時間を調査に割いてくれた最初の7人の EPEL SIG メンバーで構成されていました。
    6 KB (87 words) - 13:23, 9 July 2010
  • = EPEL SIG ミーティング =
    2 KB (29 words) - 13:19, 9 July 2010
  • = EPEL 向けのパッケージングガイドラインとポリシー = ...理しています。EPEL特有の例外は、本ガイドラインと [[EPEL:Packaging]] のページに文書化されています。
    18 KB (262 words) - 07:20, 12 May 2019
  • = History and Philosophy of EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) = ...s well as a SIG where folks just got things done and reached consensus, so EPEL moved to that model.
    1 KB (206 words) - 19:44, 19 March 2011
  • #REDIRECT [[About EPEL/ja]]
    27 bytes (4 words) - 13:08, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/FAQ/ja]]
    25 bytes (4 words) - 13:09, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/PackageMaintainer/GenericJobDescription/ja]]
    61 bytes (5 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL SIG/ja]]
    25 bytes (4 words) - 13:10, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL Steering Committee/ja]]
    40 bytes (5 words) - 13:11, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/Schedule/ja]]
    30 bytes (4 words) - 13:11, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/Meetings/ja]]
    30 bytes (4 words) - 13:11, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies/ja]]
    43 bytes (4 words) - 13:12, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/ja]]
    21 bytes (3 words) - 13:09, 28 June 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/FrontPageContributors/ja]]
    43 bytes (4 words) - 13:22, 28 June 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/FrontPageStarters/ja]]
    39 bytes (4 words) - 13:26, 28 June 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/ContributorStatus/ja]]
    39 bytes (4 words) - 13:12, 9 July 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL package maintainer generic job description]]
    61 bytes (7 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • == EPEL SysV Initscripts == ...scripts, for use and inclusion in packages for EPEL 5 and 6. Packages for EPEL 7 should use systemd units as documented in the [[Packaging:Systemd|Fedora
    27 KB (4,181 words) - 00:49, 10 November 2015
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL package maintainer generic job description/Japanese]]
    70 bytes (8 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL package maintainer generic job description/ja]]
    64 bytes (8 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • = RHEL entitlements for EPEL maintainers = .... This will allow you to a RHEL7 entitlement to help develop and test your EPEL packages.
    320 bytes (47 words) - 18:05, 25 April 2016
  • = Joining the EPEL SIG = There are many ways to join in and help out with EPEL. A few are listed below. If you think of another way to help out the SIG, f
    1 KB (229 words) - 14:32, 11 April 2012
  • #REDIRECT [[History and Philosophy of EPEL]]
    44 bytes (6 words) - 19:34, 19 March 2011
  • = EPEL Quality Assurance = EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assura
    1 KB (182 words) - 19:46, 19 March 2011
  • = EPEL Package Maintainers = ...reports, update packages and add new packages to the collection as needed. EPEL packagers are members of the Fedora "packagers" group.
    4 KB (619 words) - 17:30, 31 August 2017
  • = EPEL Updates Policy = ...general EPEL package guidelines, refer to the [[EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies|EPEL Guidelines and Policy]] page.
    2 KB (358 words) - 18:28, 1 March 2017
  • = Paquetes Adicionales para Linux Empresarial (EPEL) = Bienvenido al hogar del Grupo de Interés Especial de EPEL.
    6 KB (930 words) - 14:16, 17 January 2017
  • = About EPEL = EPEL was started because many Fedora contributors wanted to use the Fedora packa
    5 KB (848 words) - 00:36, 5 January 2012
  • 40 bytes (5 words) - 18:23, 12 September 2014
  • {{lang|en|es|ja|zh_cn(简体中文)|page=EPEL}}
    47 bytes (8 words) - 12:49, 11 December 2011
  • = 企业版 Linux 附加软件包(EPEL) = 欢迎您来到企业版 Linux 附加软件包(EPEL)特别兴趣小组首页!
    7 KB (354 words) - 01:13, 20 June 2018
  • = 加入 EPEL 特别兴趣小组 = ...的列表。如果您有更好的想法,请通过电子邮件列表与 EPEL 小组的管理员交流。
    1 KB (31 words) - 19:33, 2 February 2017
  • = EPEL Package Maintainers = ...reports, update packages and add new packages to the collection as needed. EPEL packagers are members of the Fedora "packagers" group.
    4 KB (623 words) - 22:35, 25 August 2015
  • == 什么是 EPEL? == EPEL (企业版 Linux 附加软件包) 是一个由 Fedora 社区志愿者推动
    20 KB (3,230 words) - 01:29, 17 January 2013
  • = OpenStack in EPEL = The OpenStack Folsom was retired from EPEL 6.
    173 bytes (25 words) - 10:22, 5 August 2014
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 01:14, 10 May 2012
  • EPEL is currently in beta phase against RHEL7 GA. This FAQ tries to answer some See: [ http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/SRPMS/repoview/ ]
    2 KB (296 words) - 08:33, 21 August 2014
  • == EPEL para colaboradores == ...| mantener paquetes EPEL como parte de un trabajo]]. Más detalles en el [[EPEL/FAQ#Contributing_to_EPEL|apartado de Preguntas frecuentes sobre el contribu
    1 KB (210 words) - 14:59, 27 December 2012
  • ...ff and on discussions about the state of packages and their versions in in EPEL. * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2012-October/msg00015.html
    5 KB (752 words) - 22:49, 9 January 2013
  • = Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) = Benvenuti nella home dell'EPEL Special Interest Group.
    6 KB (878 words) - 06:03, 10 July 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[Architectures/PowerPC/WorkQueue for EPEL 7]]
    56 bytes (6 words) - 09:49, 12 March 2015
  • 60 bytes (9 words) - 06:41, 6 March 2013
  • ...tails on how to do Provides and Requires Filtering for EPEL 4 and 5, see [[EPEL:Packaging#Perl_Provides_and_Requires_Filtering]]. At a minimum you should h ...t defined in EPEL5. People wanting to share one spec file with Fedora and EPEL need to conditionalize use of the macros. That can be done like this:
    8 KB (1,220 words) - 17:51, 30 April 2013
  • == EPEL Branches == EPEL 7 branches can be requested via [[Package SCM admin requests]].
    211 KB (24,543 words) - 18:17, 12 September 2014
  • ...odhi], on the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel epel-devel] mailing list and the relevant [http://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] == Using the epel-testing repository ==
    6 KB (971 words) - 14:22, 29 September 2015
  • = EPEL faster repo ideas = This is a container wiki page for ideas around a separate repo from EPEL that has different policies and expectations. Note that this is all just id
    3 KB (432 words) - 00:54, 8 September 2014
  • 150 bytes (17 words) - 15:14, 11 March 2015
  • This is a shorthand list of items we are needing to cover for building EPEL-8 in Fedora Infrastructure for the Fiscal Year 2020. * Make a version of EPEL available by end of March for the beta of RHEL-8.
    10 KB (1,634 words) - 12:37, 14 May 2019
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]
    48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
  • = Pacotes Adicionais para Enterprise Linux (EPEL) = Bem-vindo ao lar do Grupo EPEL.
    6 KB (950 words) - 01:48, 29 October 2016
  • = EPEL meeting process = This guide explains how to manage and run a EPEL IRC meeting. Many of the steps here could well apply to other groups that h
    4 KB (726 words) - 18:36, 19 July 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Tasks/LongTerm]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 16:29, 16 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Bug Day 2014]]
    39 bytes (5 words) - 16:34, 16 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/JeffSheltren/EPELMeetingTime]]
    55 bytes (5 words) - 16:39, 16 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List]]
    44 bytes (6 words) - 22:39, 28 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List/Japanese]]
    53 bytes (7 words) - 22:39, 28 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports]]
    34 bytes (4 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week01]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week02]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week03]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week04]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week05]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week06]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week07]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week08]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week09]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week10]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week11]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week17]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week19]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week20]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week21]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week22]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week23]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week24]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week25]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week26]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week27]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week28]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week29]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week30]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week31]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week32]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week33]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week34]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week35]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week36]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week37]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week38]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week39]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week40]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week41]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week42]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week43]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week44]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week45]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week46]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week47]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week48]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week49]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week50]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:15, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week51]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:15, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week52]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:15, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/SteeringCommittee/Voting]]
    51 bytes (5 words) - 19:19, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 15:39, 23 September 2017
  • The change moves EPEL composes to biannual based composes and adds an latest packages tagged for a particular EPEL release (example epel-7)
    4 KB (681 words) - 18:28, 27 February 2019

Page text matches

  • 15:05 <@mmcgrath> dgilmore: anything to report on your end from EPEL or other things?
    12 KB (1,832 words) - 14:08, 11 July 2008
  • === EPEL Update === ...deline (e.g. latest and greatest vs. a more stable approach), and that the EPEL community should make this decision.
    30 KB (5,030 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • === EPEL === * Need someplace to announce epel package builds.
    42 KB (6,565 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • 0:32 < thl> | mmcgrath, dgilmore, what's the builder status for EPEL? 0:34 < thl> | anything else we want to discuss regarding EPEL?
    25 KB (3,279 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • 15:36 < dgilmore> EPEL buildsys is up and running there will be some work for push scripts. and g ...ny of you new guys after things to do there is plenty that can be done for EPEL
    22 KB (3,481 words) - 14:09, 11 July 2008
  • ...oject is an initiative to package GIS related software, to make Fedora and EPEL attractive platforms for you GIS needs. It also covers some software from a === EPEL 6 ===
    31 KB (4,458 words) - 20:10, 13 May 2019
  • ...what to do for EPEL branches EL-4 and EL-5 can be found here: [[Packaging:EPEL#PHP_ABI_Check_Handling]]}} ...ons of Fedora and RHEL/EPEL-6, but does NOT work for RHEL/EPEL-5. For RHEL/EPEL-5 packages, you will need to use Requires: php-common >= $VERSION.
    15 KB (2,103 words) - 12:10, 2 June 2014
  • = EPEL Steering Committee = ...lly an EPEL Steering Committee was formed by FESCo as a governing body for EPEL. This committee consisted of seven members
    5 KB (773 words) - 19:01, 20 February 2019
  • ...ed the topic to: FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL -- thl -- okay for everybody if the EPEL-SIGs works more on its own and reports to FESCo <thl> my mail to fedora-devel about EPEL got 0 responses
    31 KB (5,200 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • <notting> right now we have 'Fedora (Core|Extras|Documentation|EPEL)'...
    21 KB (3,696 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • ...ht find this useful in cases where, for example, your employer is using an EPEL package in their infrastructure. In such a case, it is your duty to your e '''EPEL Package Maintainer'''
    3 KB (413 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • ...list for Fedora-wide things where different groups (packagers, art, docs, EPEL, ...) can share informations -- we don't have such a place currently and so
    10 KB (1,525 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
  • for Enterprise Linux” (EPEL) Lösungen und Entwicklungsmöglich­keiten für Ihr Business. the "Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux" (EPEL) Project. People that are not
    9 KB (1,335 words) - 10:00, 3 March 2009
  • Fedora applies fixes and features from the '''wine-staging''' project. EPEL packages do not use wine-staging patches. | EPEL 7 || 1.8.5
    5 KB (651 words) - 18:20, 4 November 2016
  • ...ars2-in-Fedora.html</ref> that TurboGears 2 is now available in Fedora and EPEL.
    24 KB (3,481 words) - 19:50, 23 November 2009
  • * [[Joining_EPEL|EPEL]]: A special interest group working on packaging software for enterprise Li
    7 KB (1,071 words) - 13:57, 25 September 2017
  • = Packaging in EPEL = The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Packaging/
    1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
  • {{admon/caution|This is a caution|This SOP is obsolete. EPEL pushes are done the same way now that Fedora ones are done.}}
    124 bytes (23 words) - 20:42, 29 March 2015
  • 15:41 < dgilmore> lmacken: i want to use it for EPEL
    29 KB (4,594 words) - 14:14, 11 July 2008
  • owners.epel.list. A few people in initialcc do not have Fedora accounts. (EPEL is being put off. It requires information from cvs and
    8 KB (1,229 words) - 22:05, 8 January 2010
  • === EPEL === * FESCo approved the formation of a steering committee for EPEL. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThorstenLeemhuis/EPELSteeringCommittee
    24 KB (4,017 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • Currently maintaining the following packages for Fedora and EPEL:
    2 KB (246 words) - 06:23, 1 September 2010
  • ...to be reviewed again before they can be un-retired. This is also true for EPEL-only packages.}} ...w Process|the package review process]] for more information. To unretire a EPEL branch if the package is still in Fedora, no re-review is required.
    6 KB (921 words) - 11:58, 5 March 2019
  • * [[EPEL SIG]]
    3 KB (467 words) - 16:59, 28 September 2010
  • = About EPEL = EPEL was started because many Fedora contributors wanted to use the Fedora packa
    5 KB (850 words) - 13:29, 9 July 2010
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 07/2008 === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week07
    61 KB (9,149 words) - 10:46, 14 April 2009
  • === EPEL === (10:11:18) jeremy has changed the topic to: FESCO meeting -- EPEL
    26 KB (3,824 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week 45 === * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-November/msg00059.html
    47 KB (6,690 words) - 10:58, 14 April 2009
  • BojanSmover proposed[1] including tcpreplay packages for FE/EPEL. The free. In part the concerns are actuated by considering EPEL. The
    33 KB (4,753 words) - 14:22, 18 September 2016
  • ...all the hard work thl... hopefully you will be able to devote some time to epel and other fun things. ;) <thl> bpepple, please make a note than I'll concentrate on EPEL and maybe some other stuff, and that I have due to my day job
    39 KB (6,669 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/Schedule]]
    27 bytes (3 words) - 20:41, 26 May 2008
  • === EPEL/Enterprise Extras === * Opinions solicited for EPEL repositories plan: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-
    38 KB (5,672 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • ...heir efforts get coordinated -- especially between different branches like EPEL and Fedora. Then there is a primary maintainer per distribution release -- ...ackage in EPEL he has to accept somebody else takes care of the package in EPEL.
    15 KB (2,499 words) - 13:13, 14 February 2018
  • | colspan="2" | * knurd wonders if we (EPEL) can start out meeting here in time | colspan="2" | * knurd wonders if we should move the EPEL meeting to #epel
    36 KB (4,825 words) - 02:13, 20 May 2009
  • ...|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux||/pub/epel||Please use this to mirror EPEL
    19 KB (2,841 words) - 12:14, 23 February 2019
  • == EPEL for Contributors == ...ption| maintaining EPEL packages as part of a job]]. More details in the [[EPEL/FAQ#Contributing_to_EPEL| FAQ entry on contributing]].
    1 KB (184 words) - 13:19, 28 June 2010
  • [[EPEL/Meetings| EPEL]]
    2 KB (201 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
  • 15:24 < warren> btw, what URL is EPEL at now? 15:24 < warren> smtp is not using EPEL packages?
    17 KB (2,673 words) - 14:16, 11 July 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 10/2008 === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week10
    26 KB (3,826 words) - 10:50, 14 April 2009
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 09/2008 === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week09
    26 KB (3,653 words) - 21:21, 20 September 2016
  • === EPEL Meeting summaries === * EPEL meeting summaries will be sent to the maintainers and FESCo mailing lists.
    16 KB (2,725 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === EPEL === (10:03:17) ***thl will move on for now and get back to EPEL later
    31 KB (4,473 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week 03/2008 === * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-January/msg00114.html
    30 KB (4,266 words) - 11:00, 14 April 2009
  • Recently the branch naming scheme of Fedora / EPEL packages has changed. Details about the change can be found on the [[Dist_
    2 KB (317 words) - 01:19, 28 May 2011
  • ...u create, get approved and have your package(s) available in Fedora and/or EPEL '''before''' you file your RFR ticket. Then fill out a ticket on https://pa * Make sure your resource is already packaged up for Fedora/EPEL before filing a RFR. Sometimes this can take a while, and filing an RFR too
    11 KB (1,815 words) - 10:54, 15 February 2019
  • ...was the first of many to suggest[3] that David should take a look at the EPEL repositories. HorstvonBrand added[4] that the purpose of Fedora was to mak ...ase evolved including a discussion of whether RHEL in conjunction with the EPEL repository was in effect "Fedora LTS".
    43 KB (6,377 words) - 10:47, 14 April 2009
  • === EPEL Meeting: 2007-03-25 === * [https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-March/msg00396.html EPEL SIG meeting: 2007-03-25]
    16 KB (2,342 words) - 14:22, 18 September 2016
  • = Mock Setup Using Local Mirror For EPEL (taking RHEL6.x as a example) = == Mock Setup for Local Mirror for EPEL ==
    13 KB (1,767 words) - 06:40, 12 November 2014
  • <tibbs> So it's pretty much the same as EPEL. tibbs: there is a strong resemblance to EPEL
    34 KB (5,985 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week 01/2008 === * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-January/msg00043.html
    30 KB (4,297 words) - 10:59, 14 April 2009
  • EPEL-5/6, the <code>/usr/share/selinux/devel/policyhelp</code> requirement is no ...de>selinux-policy</code> packages since Fedora Core 5 until Fedora 19 (and EPEL-5/6).
    24 KB (3,548 words) - 20:28, 14 October 2016
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 10/2008 === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week10
    13 KB (1,862 words) - 10:52, 14 April 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies]]
    40 bytes (3 words) - 20:42, 26 May 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 04:24, 4 March 2009
  • --- bpepple has changed the topic to: FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL -- fedora-usermgmt? * thl wonders why this topic is EPEL specific
    25 KB (4,253 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • ...ere that page comes into conflict with this one, in the case of Fedora and EPEL, this page takes precedence: in the case of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and ot
    12 KB (2,030 words) - 11:23, 6 October 2018
  • ...rise Linux の一部ではないパッケージとは何でしょうか? EPEL とは何でしょうか? == ...イズ Linux 向けの拡張パッケージ]]又は頭文字を取って EPEL と呼ばれています。
    13 KB (469 words) - 23:54, 22 August 2010
  • ...y requested that it happens soon because it'll help with comaintainers and EPEL)
    29 KB (5,124 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • ...week, we have great announcements for Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL), 3000 Fedora 7 Installations as well as FESCo Election Results. Also we ar === Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) Now Open ===
    45 KB (6,502 words) - 10:49, 14 April 2009
  • Sep 05 14:55:50 <caillon> so we could maybe see if we can swap with EPEL which is an hour earlier every other week Sep 05 15:10:34 <marek> epel meeting?
    26 KB (3,743 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • === Extras Packages for Enterprise Linux aka EPEL aka Enterprise Extras === * Name will be Extras Packages for Enterprise Linux (by Fedora) aka EPEL
    28 KB (4,030 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • == EPEL für Beitragende == * [[EPEL SIG| EPEL Spezialinteressensgruppe (SIG)]] - betreibt EPEL
    836 bytes (117 words) - 04:21, 4 March 2009
  • --epel -- look epel owner(s) up
    6 KB (777 words) - 19:50, 23 February 2014
  • ...refix on Fedora, you are making my life harder, because I cannot use it in EPEL. What do I do?
    19 KB (2,914 words) - 11:43, 25 April 2019
  • 15:30 < dgilmore> EPEL buildsys is up. i have succesful builds for EL-4 and EL-5
    14 KB (2,157 words) - 14:08, 11 July 2008
  • ...-list] is the main mailing list for all discussion of OCaml in Fedora and EPEL, anything to do with packaging, maintenance, bugs, contacting maintainers,
    1 KB (167 words) - 05:41, 16 October 2010
  • == Is EPEL "upstream" or "officially package repository" (like Fedora Extras was)? == EPEL is just one of several add on repositories with RPM packages for RHEL and d
    2 KB (421 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 11/2008 === * [[EPEL/Reports/Week11]]
    14 KB (2,029 words) - 21:36, 20 September 2016
  • ...ng</th><td class="text" style="color: #8c4a4a">f13: that is: 1) updates 2) epel 3) extras</td><td class="time">14:21</td></tr>
    77 KB (13,026 words) - 17:21, 13 February 2015
  • === EPEL Update === ...essary people will be at FUDCon, and the plan is to have session regarding EPEL at the HackFest.
    33 KB (5,699 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • ...--- | thl has changed the topic to: FESCo meeting in progress -- EPEL 0:28 < ixs> | btw: we should see how we get some rhel cds to the EPEL maintainers.
    31 KB (4,360 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • Linux releases. When EPEL was started, RHEL lifetimes were 5 years and packagers in EPEL were bound to support software longer than RHEL did
    3 KB (408 words) - 17:47, 13 February 2019
  • * Blockers (getting mediawiki in EPEL)
    505 bytes (70 words) - 22:31, 8 January 2010
  • ...://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=274341 274341]||Provide keychain in EPEL ...ode>||[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431030 431030]||dtc for EPEL 4/5
    994 KB (150,950 words) - 23:19, 29 December 2012
  • === EPEL === * FESCo approved a mandate for the continuation of EPEL, and will let the EPEL folks decide on governance.
    2 KB (249 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • (10:03:14 AM) thl has changed the topic to: FESCo meeting -- EPEL - where to upload stuff (dgilmore, mmcgrath) (10:06:23 AM) warren: EPEL should be a smaller subset than Extras if it is to be realistic to support.
    31 KB (4,842 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...ied. Would this be obsolete? thl: only for F7 and later; and there is also epel; Further: maybe other projects arise in the future that need to be handled.
    5 KB (820 words) - 21:17, 25 May 2008
  • Once Fedora 8 will be released, the FEL packages will be pushed to the EPEL repositories so that other distributions such as CentOS, Scientific Linux e
    10 KB (1,509 words) - 00:27, 8 June 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week 02/2008 === * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-January/msg00058.html
    29 KB (4,162 words) - 10:59, 14 April 2009
  • * [[EPEL| EPEL]] - Rebuild of Fedora packages for RHEL or compatible derivatives
    666 bytes (89 words) - 22:47, 22 February 2009
  • = EPEL SIG Meetings = The EPEL SIG meeting are open for everyone and held each week on Friday in #epel at 17:00 UTC. Due to the fact that different parts of the world go on dayli
    1 KB (253 words) - 19:30, 21 November 2014
  • === EPEL === (10:03:01) thl has changed the topic to: FESCo meeting in progress -- EPEL
    33 KB (4,867 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • ...ory wasting" python daemons, lags in pushing updates compared to the <code>EPEL</code> repositories, lack of information on the recent intrusion, poor Germ
    36 KB (5,151 words) - 10:37, 14 April 2009
  • 1. Q: What versions of Fedora and EPEL use or will use Bodhi? A: Fedora utilizes Bodhi as of Fedora 7. EPEL now utilizes Koji and Bodhi.
    13 KB (2,094 words) - 20:24, 7 August 2018
  • * EPEL
    258 bytes (30 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • <!-- page was renamed from SIGs/EPEL ...s as simple as having a love for Enterprise Linux and participating in the EPEL SIG.
    2 KB (295 words) - 14:19, 23 September 2014
  • (10:01:07 AM) thl has changed the topic to: FESCo meeting -- EPEL - where to upload stuff (dgilmore, mmcgrath) (10:01:20 AM) dgilmore: thl: /pub/epel
    35 KB (5,459 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • === Repowars II: Add Some EPEL "repotag" Duct Tape? === ...e[1] . This discussion concerned the Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) repository[2] that aims to provide a way for high-quality Fedora packages
    33 KB (4,754 words) - 21:29, 20 September 2016
  • 1. Q: What versions of Fedora and EPEL use or will use Bodhi? A: Fedora 7 utilizes Bodhi, as will Fedora 8. All EPEL releases will use bodhi as soon as they are ported over to the Koji Buildsy
    6 KB (1,096 words) - 18:43, 26 May 2009
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week 2007 Week 50 === * http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Reports/Week50
    31 KB (4,400 words) - 10:59, 14 April 2009
  • * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras.
    930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
  • ...e manner in spec files, to help others wanting to reuse the spec files (in EPEL, in 3rd party repository, in derived distributions, in local repository or
    19 KB (3,045 words) - 16:02, 24 August 2015
  • * [[EPEL|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux]] is the project that focuses on branch * IRC channel -- #epel on [irc://irc.freenode.net irc.freenode.net]
    2 KB (291 words) - 21:50, 17 September 2016
  • == Mit EPEL anfangen == * [[de_DE/EPEL/Über| Über]]
    794 bytes (112 words) - 04:09, 4 March 2009
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 05/2008 === * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2008-February/msg00009.html
    29 KB (3,982 words) - 21:06, 20 September 2016
  • * cfengine - (Fedora and EPEL) [http://www.cfengine.org] * fortune-mod - (Fedora and EPEL) [http://www.redellipse.net/code/fortune]
    887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
  • Enterprise Linux and EPEL do. Additionally, compatibility with EPEL, but are not required to do so.
    17 KB (2,484 words) - 11:18, 31 August 2012
  • ...ackage in the fedora-devel branch, then in other branches (stable release, EPEL branch, etc)
    6 KB (874 words) - 10:47, 14 October 2015
  • * Fedora 7 (EPEL probably doesn't have the necessary dependencies to build the complete Aste
    2 KB (224 words) - 22:08, 8 January 2010
  • === EPEL === * Local EPEL mock builds can be done with CentOS but the configuration is not yet shippe
    50 KB (7,846 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • 15:08 < abadger1999> but there's also importing the new owners.list/owners.epel/acls.
    10 KB (1,499 words) - 14:15, 11 July 2008
  • To build Packages for the Fedora Collection or [[EPEL]] in the Fedora build system you need [[Using_the_Koji_build_system|Koji]]. ...buildroot override. For packages in EPEL, you have to use the component ''epel'' to get the request to the right persons.
    21 KB (3,432 words) - 13:45, 31 January 2019
  • = EPEL verstehen = == Was ist EPEL? ==
    6 KB (969 words) - 22:04, 2 June 2008
  • (10:02:04 AM) thl has changed the topic to: FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL -- mmcgrath, dgilmore -- status update (10:03:28 AM) nirik: are all the epel packages now in the epel owners list?
    37 KB (5,853 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • --- bpepple has changed the topic to: FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL <bpepple> anything to report on from the EPEL sig?
    28 KB (4,816 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • === The Weekly EPEL Report === ...get date for an official EPEL announcement. On July 19 is the date for the EPEL announcement and all broken dependencies need to be fixed before hand. This
    21 KB (3,079 words) - 08:16, 18 September 2016
  • ...or CentOS distribution, Red Hat's new Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL)[2] repository might be an excellent place to go fishing." [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
    65 KB (9,787 words) - 10:49, 14 April 2009
  • ...s/pkgwat pkgwat] Checking that your project's gems are available in Fedora/EPEL repos.
    6 KB (909 words) - 16:38, 23 May 2019
  • = Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) = Welcome to the home of the EPEL Special Interest Group.
    8 KB (1,184 words) - 19:49, 22 May 2019
  • From the current pkg.acl and owners.(epel)?.list
    23 KB (3,946 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • --- bpepple has changed the topic to: FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL -- mmcgrath, dgilmore -- status update <mmcgrath> notting: whats the scoop on our primary mirror for EPEL?
    44 KB (7,635 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • * [[EPEL Package Wish List]]
    5 KB (633 words) - 21:45, 19 September 2016
  • Through EPEL, a customer or ISV/IHV can push out or support (co-maintain) a Fedora Extra ...You gain on the library in the community, gain build and testing through EPEL, and ensure that your closed application is more solid.
    1 KB (204 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week NN/2008 === * [[EPEL/Reports]]
    2 KB (160 words) - 21:35, 20 September 2016
  • === Rebranding EPEL === Karsten Wade announced [1] that the Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) project was going to go through a rebranding process and invited intereste
    50 KB (7,740 words) - 14:05, 20 October 2011
  • ...ons[3] of Java: GCJ, OpenJDK/IcedTea, ecj, java-1.6.0-sun (this latter for EPEL only). His interest had been sparked by the observation that some packages
    27 KB (3,917 words) - 08:15, 18 September 2016
  • ...rge review of someone else's package and then signed up to maintain it for epel</td></tr>
    68 KB (10,787 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • Maintain koji setup and builders for Fedora Collection and EPEL. Maintain mock configs and the buildsys-build and buildsys-macros packages
    3 KB (500 words) - 10:00, 14 February 2019
  • (10:01:00 AM) thl has changed the topic to: FESCo meeting -- EPEL ...mcgrath, I'd like it if one of you two (or both?) could be responsible for EPEL and driing it furhter
    43 KB (6,580 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...HEL) and its compatible spinoffs like CentOS or Scientific Linux. <BR> The EPEL repository is not yet publicly available -- we are in the process of creati
    788 bytes (104 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...emented EPEL buildsys and drove the initial idea forward. FESCo member and EPEL steering committie member.
    12 KB (1,817 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • = Packaging Guidelines and Policies for EPEL = The packages in EPEL follow the Fedora Packaging and Maintenance Guidelines --
    13 KB (2,109 words) - 18:27, 17 May 2018
  • ** we will need to work out how to do EPEL releng in bodhi | style="color: #488888" | we will need to work out how to do EPEL releng in bodhi
    15 KB (1,982 words) - 00:40, 24 February 2009
  • * ISV introductions to EPEL
    1 KB (214 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • (10:03:21) jwb: thl, i had a separate question about EPEL... (10:04:16) jwb: thl, right now users will not be able to do mock builds for EPEL unless they have RHEL locally
    29 KB (4,165 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • 20:01 < mdomsch_> | that epel won't take care of?
    97 KB (13,376 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • for EPEL, too <knurd> no, I meant how long has EPEL to wait
    20 KB (3,540 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • === Why Not Build For EPEL Too? === ...tion was made by Thorsten for Fedora packagers to build their packages for EPEL, which will allow RHEL and CentOS users (and other RHEL-based distributions
    36 KB (5,224 words) - 10:25, 14 April 2009
  • Once Fedora 8 will be released, the FEL packages will be pushed to the EPEL repositories so that other distributions such as CentOS, Scientific Linux e
    9 KB (1,509 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...draft, based on proposal from TimJackson [ https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-April/msg00159.html ] * Red Hat Enterprise Linux and compatible derivatives (via EPEL)
    3 KB (411 words) - 22:14, 22 February 2009
  • 20:01 < mdomsch_> | that epel won't take care of?
    247 KB (34,185 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • --- bpepple has changed the topic to: FESCO-Meeting -- EPEL <bpepple> Is there anything need to be discussed the the EPEL group.
    20 KB (3,479 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
  • ...check that your application doesn't use it before submitting it to Fedora/EPEL.</del>
    10 KB (1,503 words) - 08:48, 2 February 2017
  • ...ation." I am currently working on the EPEL Steering Committee, and working EPEL-8 packages. * '''IRC''': smooge #epel #centos-devel #fedora-noc
    1 KB (181 words) - 20:05, 21 May 2019
  • == EPEL SysV Initscripts == ...es for SysV-style Initscripts, for use and inclusion in EPEL 5/6 packages. EPEL 7 and newer MUST provide systemd units and follow the appropriate [[Packagi
    28 KB (4,184 words) - 11:44, 9 February 2017
  • ==== Within EPEL: ====
    8 KB (1,188 words) - 12:46, 17 March 2019
  • | Date || Rawhide || Fedora 8 || Fedora 7 || Fedora 6 || EPEL 5 || EPEL 4
    934 bytes (52 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
  • ...than Branched (until the [[Schedule|Final Freeze]]), Rawhide (master) and EPEL branches (el6, epel7). When you need to add package from EPEL to any RHEL release, only retire EPEL branch when package is released in that RHEL release.}}
    5 KB (758 words) - 06:14, 20 March 2019
  • == What is EPEL? == EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) is a volunteer-based community effort
    22 KB (3,581 words) - 14:08, 25 July 2018
  • ...ass="action" colspan="3">* nirik off topically wonders if we couldn't do a EPEL build with centos with this. ;) </td></tr>
    104 KB (17,068 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • === EPEL ===
    32 KB (4,786 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • # Instale o facter e o puppet a partir do EPEL
    7 KB (1,151 words) - 00:09, 6 March 2018
  • == PPC64LE EPEL 7 == and epel7 source packages list getting [http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/ here]
    21 KB (2,584 words) - 14:11, 7 March 2017
  • == Scripted Branch Process for EPEL == If you have a few packages (>2) that need to branched for EPEL, you are in luck. [[DennisGilmore| Dennis Gilmore]] has put together a s
    850 bytes (135 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • === EPEL === <thl> will EPEL switch to koji at the same times as Extras?
    25 KB (4,353 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • epel-push testing/5 epel-push all
    4 KB (702 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...the product. At the moment Nov, 19, 2007, those are Fedora Devel, Fedora EPEL 5, and Fedora OLPC 2.
    9 KB (1,425 words) - 16:41, 2 April 2019
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 06/2008 === * [[EPEL/Reports/Week06]]
    41 KB (5,924 words) - 21:09, 20 September 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[Category:EPEL]]
    27 bytes (3 words) - 03:42, 29 May 2008
  • * Provide easy upgrade paths to tools as they become available (maybe EPEL, or something similar)
    1 KB (241 words) - 17:46, 23 October 2008
  • ...onts-list has been established[1] as a special interest group for Fedora, EPEL, and the OLPC. It will not be strictly fonts, but also text rendering/layou * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-October/msg00013.html
    49 KB (7,059 words) - 10:57, 14 April 2009
  • * There is a repository called [[EPEL]] that are Fedora packages rebuilt for RHEL versions. This is a great way [[EPEL|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL)]] is the premier Fedora repository for packages branched and maintained fo
    5 KB (798 words) - 22:15, 12 June 2010
  • === EPEL Report Week 20 === ...to eighty, and now in total for EPEL 5 there are over 470 binary packages (EPEL 4 binary package count is currently at 358).
    51 KB (7,421 words) - 10:25, 14 April 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 13:46, 12 March 2009
  • * EPEL
    4 KB (689 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
  • ...expectations surrounding the use of, security tracking bugs for Fedora and EPEL. The workflow for resolving security issues in Fedora and EPEL is through the use of bugs in bugzilla. This consists of both a parent bug
    4 KB (634 words) - 13:36, 25 September 2014
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week 2007-12-05 === * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-December/msg00025.html
    38 KB (5,234 words) - 10:59, 14 April 2009
  • * Must carry everything under fedora-enchilada and fedora-epel. This allows Tier 2 mirrors to exclude what they wish, but get everything ...|| Everything under /pub/epel/, including pre-bitflip content (even though EPEL doesn't do bitflips)
    6 KB (879 words) - 06:31, 17 September 2018
  • ...e to possible patent problems. No replacements of packages in RHEL/CentOS, EPEL or Fedora will be carried, only add-ons including kmods. ...puted that Fedora and RHEL had different audiences citing the existence of EPEL as evidence. A thread then developed where Rahul contrasted Fedora/RHEL rol
    90 KB (12,853 words) - 10:57, 14 April 2009
  • fedora-override or epel-override permissions are required to tag packages into the -override tags.<
    5 KB (757 words) - 10:34, 21 April 2014
  • * sit together and discuss (and maybe even solve some) some stuff (EPEL, kmods, FESCo issues...) as needed -- that sometimes a lot easier in person * 16:00 special (mini-)sub-sessions as needed in room #2; (EPEL SIG?)
    12 KB (1,948 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ...branch in an existing package repository for another version of Fedora (or EPEL), and initialize it with the contents of the development/rawhide branch (or
    1 KB (237 words) - 22:29, 8 January 2010
  • ...: #b86161"> mdomsch_</th><td class="text" style="color: #b86161">| that epel won't take care of?</td><td class="time"><a href="#t20:01" class="time">20:
    715 KB (118,867 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • ...e for EPEL||All||2007-08-30||FESCo voted to make permanent the mandate for EPEL
    10 KB (1,437 words) - 17:57, 7 August 2009
  • <bpepple> and if we want some assigned seats from other groups (like EPEL, FAB, packaging). and epel.
    23 KB (3,864 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • === EPEL === ...ts on top of it to the EPEL buildsys. And multiple trees and channels of EPEL can be built into repos automatically based upon which dependencies they pu
    45 KB (7,126 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • ...ode>||[https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431030 431030]||dtc for EPEL 4/5 ...ps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430808 430808]||Please Branch for EPEL
    301 KB (36,648 words) - 23:14, 29 December 2012
  • <thl> otherwise EPEL will get hard <warren> EPEL owners are different
    31 KB (5,424 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
  • == What about packages not part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? What is EPEL? == ...ompatible rebuilds called [[EPEL|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux]], or EPEL.
    11 KB (1,652 words) - 15:44, 26 February 2018
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Meeting Week ?? ===
    50 KB (7,102 words) - 10:59, 14 April 2009
  • ...up on the tracker bug but if the package is only shipped in Fedora and/or EPEL and not RHEL there may not be any additional feedback from Red Hat.
    8 KB (1,234 words) - 08:38, 19 July 2017
  • * [[EPEL]] - Rebuild di pacchetti Fedora per RHEL o derivati compatibili
    868 bytes (105 words) - 12:14, 9 March 2009
  • * You will need to install sshuttle (available in Fedora and EPEL).
    2 KB (370 words) - 16:31, 14 August 2013
  • For example, create a stub category for EPEL: [[:Category:EPEL]]
    2 KB (275 words) - 15:33, 6 September 2008
  • ...that this section is now redundant in all supported versions of Fedora and EPEL. ...ot necessary. If you have complex requirements or need compatibility with EPEL, you may still need this. The "<code>%patch0</code>" command applies Patch0
    81 KB (12,728 words) - 16:46, 26 February 2018
  • == Changes for EPEL ==
    412 bytes (56 words) - 08:18, 18 September 2016
  • The status of Erlang and related packages in Fedora/EPEL is shown at [[SIGs/Erlang#Current_packages|Erlang SIG]] page.
    4 KB (631 words) - 10:24, 31 March 2012
  • * Building an ISV ecosystem, including [[EPEL|EPEL]].
    7 KB (985 words) - 14:46, 18 September 2016
  • == Supporting EPEL Builds in Koji == Using Koji to build EPEL packages has been a goal for a long time. However, it has been held up by
    7 KB (1,247 words) - 18:43, 15 July 2008
  • ...maintaining order. I'm on the security team, where I try and make sure the EPEL packages are kept up to date with security issues and pushed out in a timel ...drove the initial idea forward. FESCo member, Fedora Board member and past EPEL steering committie member.
    11 KB (1,875 words) - 19:04, 22 July 2008
  • ...but since we want to maintain compatibility for older releases (including EPEL), we continue to retain them in the spec file
    31 KB (4,478 words) - 09:06, 18 September 2016
  • [10] ''plague'' is the distributed package build system used by the EPEL repository
    31 KB (4,478 words) - 08:16, 18 September 2016
  • ...or: #407a40" | #1 has to do with buildsystems. MinGW wants to target both EPEL and Fedora right? | style="color: #42427e" | f13, errrmm, well ... if it was just EPEL-6 (which I guess will be based on koji) then we could live with that
    77 KB (10,440 words) - 21:55, 13 October 2008
  • * [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468269 Request to add JBoss to EPEL] is closely aligned with this goal. Not sure how far along the effort there
    1 KB (213 words) - 21:43, 30 January 2012
  • == The procedure for getting a package in EPEL == Otherwise, if you'd like to see a Fedora package in EPEL that is not yet available, check Fedora's [ https://src.fedoraproject.org/
    3 KB (587 words) - 20:15, 7 December 2018
  • #REDIRECT [[Getting a Fedora package in EPEL]]
    46 bytes (7 words) - 02:54, 21 December 2008
  • | style="color: #407a40" | for Red Hat and CentOS, you'll need EPEL configured | style="color: #407a40" | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
    46 KB (5,684 words) - 18:14, 7 December 2008
  • === How can I get a new font package included in Fedora/OLPC/EPEL? ===
    23 KB (3,683 words) - 09:36, 23 February 2009
  • * [[EPEL| EPEL]] - Recontrução de Pacotes fedora para RHEL ou derivados compativeis.
    748 bytes (95 words) - 20:31, 24 October 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL Pushing Infrastructure SOP]] {{R from shortcut}}
    65 bytes (8 words) - 19:53, 17 February 2009
  • ...have passed review, or for existing packages that need a new branch (e.g. EPEL). Release Engineering has written a script to automate this process.
    1 KB (179 words) - 17:50, 3 November 2015
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List]]
    44 bytes (6 words) - 10:49, 24 March 2019
  • ...nd will not be shipped with F11." The initial list mistakenly listed <code>EPEL</code> packages and a shorter revised list was posted<ref>http://www.redhat
    52 KB (7,904 words) - 10:34, 14 April 2009
  • ...ut should any conflicts occur, these guidelines should take precedence (on EPEL packages). As a reminder, these guidelines only apply to EPEL packages, not to Fedora packages.
    14 KB (2,046 words) - 19:42, 17 January 2019
  • | colspan="2" | *** The channel topic is "EPEL meeting - who's here?". | style="color: #407a40" | biggest epel meeting all year :)
    41 KB (5,312 words) - 21:59, 27 March 2009
  • ...become more flexible with handling different releases, such as Fedora and EPEL, which have different policies. ...t packages are not pushed which would break dependencies within Fedora (or EPEL).
    6 KB (1,018 words) - 04:36, 19 September 2014
  • ...eb framework. TurboGears 1.x is already fully-supported within Fedora and EPEL. TurboGears2 is a reinvention of itself on top of the [http://pylonshq.com {{admon/tip|TurboGears2|TurboGears2 available in Fedora & EPEL and can be installed with <code>yum install TurboGears2 python-tg-devtools<
    8 KB (957 words) - 20:09, 31 August 2010
  • ...ove it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag. Fedora < 10 and EPEL 5 or less still need to have the tag.}}
    993 bytes (157 words) - 00:48, 21 May 2009
  • ...en that was not a Red Hat employee and was among those that helped getting EPEL and RPM Fusion running. He works as technical writer/journalist and lives i
    1 KB (204 words) - 10:43, 31 May 2009
  • ...utors. Try and improve end user support and communication. Try and improve EPEL support and package coverage. Try to help out with the package review backl * '''Past work summary''': Former board member, Fesco member, EPEL Founder, Secondary arches implementer, OLPC , Infrastructure, spacewalk, ge
    8 KB (1,229 words) - 20:34, 19 September 2016
  • ...o make sure the feature process keeps moving along ok. I would love to see EPEL get into koji/bodhi. I am interested to see what the upcoming FAD day about
    78 KB (10,642 words) - 08:50, 18 September 2016
  • |Secondary arches more widely accepted and worked on. EPEL moved to koji/bodhi requirements for new VCS
    42 KB (7,236 words) - 19:01, 5 June 2009
  • * '''Past work summary''': Former board member, Fesco member, EPEL Founder, Secondary arches implementer, OLPC , Infrastructure, spacewalk, ge
    4 KB (695 words) - 21:18, 26 October 2009
  • ...greed that they would be happy to help out with the Bug Day, and asked the EPEL project to provide more information closer to the date.
    24 KB (3,583 words) - 15:24, 22 June 2009
  • * Topic: request from EPEL project for help with their bug day There was general discussion and a reminder about the upcoming EPEL Team Bug Day.
    18 KB (2,348 words) - 07:55, 18 September 2016
  • * Percentage of packages with EPEL, OLPC branches
    2 KB (336 words) - 16:00, 26 April 2010
  • = Python 3 applications and modules in EPEL 7+ = ...discourage breaking ABI compatibility, separate Python 3 minor versions in EPEL 7+ are packaged as separate python3X (currently Python34) packages. At any
    9 KB (1,206 words) - 15:38, 20 October 2016
  • ...atures needed to support these guidelines exists. If you're packaging for EPEL 5 you should follow the [[Packaging:Old_Ruby | old ruby guidelines]] instea ...guidelines]] if you want your package to work on those versions of Fedora/EPEL}}
    25 KB (3,835 words) - 19:33, 14 October 2016
  • * Now available for EPEL
    32 KB (4,820 words) - 15:50, 13 July 2009
  • ...tation of MeetBot used by the Fedora project is packaged in the Fedora and EPEL repositories. It can be installed with 'sudo dnf install supybot-meetbot'.
    10 KB (1,551 words) - 20:08, 6 August 2018
  • ...>/usr/share/modulefiles</code>. This macro is available in Fedora 21+ and EPEL 7+. The directory <code>/usr/share/Modules/modulefiles</code> is to be used
    5 KB (787 words) - 17:26, 8 May 2014
  • ...ebase. The changes make Fedora Community able to process information from EPEL, and also provide a variety of other bugfixes and enhancements.
    17 KB (2,440 words) - 17:58, 10 August 2009
  • ...f using RHEL or CentOS, enable [[EPEL]] by following the instructions at [[EPEL/FAQ#howtouse]]</li>
    6 KB (934 words) - 11:16, 29 November 2012
  • * BuildRoot (Not required and ignored by RPM in Fedora. EPEL (4 and 5) still requires it)
    4 KB (608 words) - 08:54, 18 September 2016
  • ...#818144" | (16:59:19) nirik: kparal: we cannot use it until it's in fedora/epel. | style="color: #818144" | (16:59:36) nirik: we don't use any non fedora/epel software if at all possible.
    63 KB (7,431 words) - 08:59, 18 September 2016
  • ...o are pure noarch and they already deal with ppc64/ppc64le builders due to EPEL. ...was previously the slowest builders in the primary koji instance (used for EPEL arch builds and any noarch) have been replaced with POWER8 hardware resolvi
    11 KB (1,833 words) - 09:19, 30 July 2016
  • Incompatible version upgrades in EPEL are to be avoided. However, in certain situations, they are unavoidable. .../lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ epel-devel] with details of the proposed upgrade. Include items such as the CVE
    3 KB (411 words) - 18:31, 1 March 2017
  • *:* (EPEL) perl-Module-Build *:* (EPEL) perl-JSON-XS
    38 KB (5,609 words) - 09:05, 1 February 2011
  • ...ig requires guidelines from [[PackagingGuidelines#Pkgconfig_Files]] to the EPEL specific guidelines.
    398 bytes (57 words) - 18:53, 11 February 2010
  • ...assador]. Today I'm maintaining about 60 packages on all active Fedora and EPEL branches (if technically possible). I'm supporting the websites team as wel
    21 KB (3,195 words) - 11:46, 8 January 2010
  • kevin added a Fedora EPEL 5 branch for webacula
    27 KB (1,401 words) - 12:41, 12 January 2011
  • ...oid the typically broken updates as we had in recent past. Finally, Fedora EPEL seems to be able to manage that schema already, why should it not be good e
    101 KB (17,724 words) - 07:59, 18 September 2016
  • dist-4E-epel dist-4E-epel-build dist-4E-epel dist-5E-epel dist-5E-epel-build dist-5E-epel
    35 KB (3,117 words) - 02:45, 19 November 2009
  • ...ssador]]. Today I'm maintaining about 60 packages on all active Fedora and EPEL branches (if technically possible). I'm supporting the websites team as wel
    8 KB (1,221 words) - 21:34, 17 September 2016
  • * Remote branches for each Fedora/EPEL release (F-12, F-11, EL-5...)
    7 KB (1,248 words) - 00:10, 15 December 2010
  • kevin added a Fedora EPEL 5 branch for webacula
    26 KB (1,353 words) - 18:39, 29 April 2011
  • * [[EPEL| EPEL]] - Rebuild of Fedora packages for RHEL or compatible derivatives
    4 KB (456 words) - 16:27, 23 December 2009
  • <!-- page was renamed from SIGs/EPEL
    3 KB (169 words) - 00:21, 30 September 2010
  • For EPEL $ sigul new-key --key-admin ausil --name-real "Fedora EPEL" \
    11 KB (1,746 words) - 17:51, 3 November 2015
  • = Maven for EPEL = ...page hosts information about the current attempt to bring maven2 into the EPEL space. At the current time, the latest version that appears to be able to b
    2 KB (308 words) - 14:29, 22 February 2010
  • ...理安装目录的命令。此阶段在 Fedora 中是多余的,仅针对 EPEL。一般只包含:
    61 KB (3,519 words) - 21:00, 19 September 2016
  • | colspan="2" | * nirik can build the epel version and get it installed later today
    44 KB (5,627 words) - 23:06, 26 February 2013
  • ...tional Fedora DVD image, however it is available in the regular Fedora and EPEL repositories. You can install Zarafa after installation using the command l ...repository [[EPEL|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux]] (EPEL) has to be [[EPEL/FAQ#howtouse|enabled]] before.
    5 KB (738 words) - 00:04, 18 March 2014
  • * '''RHEL/CentOS 4 or later'''. In RHEL/CentOS 4 and 5, the [[EPEL]] repository must be enabled.
    4 KB (704 words) - 15:42, 27 August 2014
  • EPEL, default: F
    6 KB (793 words) - 19:51, 24 January 2018
  • ...令。請注意這個區段目前在 Fedora 中是多餘的,並且只有 EPEL 需要。一般這只包含:
    66 KB (3,733 words) - 21:00, 19 September 2016
  • == New EPEL packages for EL-6 ==
    258 bytes (30 words) - 15:06, 6 May 2010
  • ...yle="color: #854685" | So we could for example build a batch of builds for EPEL and then makke a single push into testing.
    56 KB (7,261 words) - 17:31, 7 April 2010
  • ...on-public || used to build rpms that aren't available in the RHEL repos or EPEL
    4 KB (578 words) - 10:47, 5 May 2016
  • * EPEL ([http://spevack.livejournal.com/102377.html additional information]) ** [[About EPEL]]
    1 KB (181 words) - 15:06, 6 April 2010
  • ...rpm. There are several reasons that the separate src.rpm is preferable in EPEL vs using the same src.rpm and separate subpackages. * In EPEL, we're bound to keep backwards compat. However, people who want to deploy
    5 KB (763 words) - 16:54, 7 December 2011
  • * Drupal 6.16 is not in EPEL-5, but may be available in EPEL-6 * Drupal modules need packaging for Fedora/EPEL
    1 KB (206 words) - 00:25, 26 April 2010
  • ...ete set of RPMs on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/etherpad/ for RHEL-6/EPEL. Absolutely no support, and no testing ("It builds? Ship it!")
    4 KB (548 words) - 22:04, 3 February 2011
  • ...ll provide SCLs (hopefully) somehow, do we need to have some collectons in EPEL delivered outside of CentOS? * Q: What about Centos -- how to handle Fedora and Centos and EPEL -- where to keep what and how to collaborate?
    7 KB (1,143 words) - 13:02, 7 January 2015
  • == EPEL への貢献 ==
    2 KB (97 words) - 13:42, 9 July 2010
  • =EPEL= ...になります。Fedora は RHEL のアップストリームであり、EPEL のアドオンパッケージは主に RHEL 向けにビルドされた Fe
    3 KB (258 words) - 05:09, 8 September 2016
  • = EPEL とは=
    8 KB (82 words) - 13:29, 9 July 2010
  • == EPEL とは何? == ...になります。Fedora は RHEL のアップストリームであり、EPEL のアドオンパッケージは主に RHEL 向けにビルドされた Fe
    30 KB (784 words) - 00:11, 31 August 2010
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List/ja]]
    47 bytes (7 words) - 22:39, 28 March 2017
  • = EPEL パッケージメンテナの一般的な作業内容 = ...ません。例えば、あなたの雇用主は自社のインフラで EPEL パッケージを使用しています。そのような状況で、何が
    4 KB (30 words) - 20:41, 7 December 2010
  • = EPEL 運営委員会 = ...活動して多くの時間を調査に割いてくれた最初の7人の EPEL SIG メンバーで構成されていました。
    6 KB (87 words) - 13:23, 9 July 2010
  • = EPEL SIG ミーティング =
    2 KB (29 words) - 13:19, 9 July 2010
  • = EPEL 向けのパッケージングガイドラインとポリシー = ...理しています。EPEL特有の例外は、本ガイドラインと [[EPEL:Packaging]] のページに文書化されています。
    18 KB (262 words) - 07:20, 12 May 2019
  • = History and Philosophy of EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) = ...s well as a SIG where folks just got things done and reached consensus, so EPEL moved to that model.
    1 KB (206 words) - 19:44, 19 March 2011
  • ...ew copr, specifying a name and one of the supported architectures + fedora/epel release. :release: one of the existing Fedora/EPEL releases
    13 KB (2,087 words) - 09:12, 18 September 2016
  • == Packages already in Fedora and Fedora/EPEL == ....org/pkgdb/acls/name/classads classads] || Condor job descriptions, Now in EPEL also.
    7 KB (868 words) - 03:31, 24 November 2011
  • * EPEL
    2 KB (319 words) - 23:44, 23 June 2010
  • ...ません。[[EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#Distribution_specific_guidelines|EPEL ガイドライン]] を参照してください}} ...3 やそれ以上から不要になります。F-12 やそれ以下(又は EPEL)では <code>rm -rf %{buildroot}</code> ([[Packaging:Guidelines#UsingBuildR
    104 KB (2,900 words) - 21:04, 8 November 2018
  • ...iguring an [[AutoQA]] server. AutoQA is currently packaged for Fedora and EPEL, but due to library dependencies, the package is not yet available in offic ...t -P /etc/yum.repos.d http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/fedora-qa/autoqa/epel-autoqa.repo}}
    3 KB (385 words) - 16:33, 11 January 2012
  • as the Fedora Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux releases 4 and 5. EPEL 6 beta (for the upcoming
    29 KB (4,165 words) - 13:56, 28 June 2010
  • The status of Erlang and related packages in Fedora/EPEL is shown at [[SIGs/Erlang#Current_packages|Erlang SIG]] page.
    5 KB (770 words) - 13:26, 29 July 2010
  • | blt || sergiopr || [[Image:Green check.png|16 px]] dist-6E-epel | cfitsio || mtruch || [[Image:Green check.png|16 px]] dist-6E-epel
    7 KB (955 words) - 19:44, 3 August 2010
  • - I have added a RHEL6b2 test machine. This may help EPEL-6 maintainers check for packages or test/debug their packages.
    28 KB (4,179 words) - 01:53, 15 July 2010
  • ...d Hat Enterprise Linux&nbsp;6; at all. If so, we will need to add these to EPEL. * <s>identify and build any dependencies not in el6 for EPEL</s>
    6 KB (989 words) - 00:29, 4 February 2014
  • ...command|epel}} for convenience. fedpkg retrieves current active Fedora and EPEL releases automatically. Hence, if you don't want to select a subset of rele
    22 KB (3,549 words) - 15:23, 30 May 2019
  • ...package. There is a version of it available now in all active Fedora and EPEL releases, although it is built to work against our staging environment wher
    31 KB (4,597 words) - 10:40, 29 July 2010
  • ...k розмістіть] повідомлення у розділі "Fedora EPEL" ([https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fe
    6 KB (451 words) - 19:13, 28 April 2015
  • EPEL, default: F
    7 KB (868 words) - 22:46, 11 September 2015
  • Fedora コレクション又は [[EPEL]] 向けにパッケージをビルドするために [[Using_the_Koji_buil ...がそのチケットを受け取れるようにコンポーネントに ''epel'' を使用する必要があります。
    31 KB (808 words) - 03:47, 27 March 2019
  • ...care sul link "Report a new bug against this package in '''Fedora''' or '''EPEL'''".
    15 KB (2,241 words) - 18:12, 21 July 2016
  • ...ll the following packages, please enable EL5/6 repositories as explained [[EPEL/FAQ#howtouse | here]].
    10 KB (1,355 words) - 14:32, 18 September 2016
  • ...paquetes para la Fedora Collection o "EPEL":https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL. También necesitarás generar un certificado de cliente en el "Fedora Acco ...un buildroot override. Para paquetes en EPEL, debes utilizar el componente epel para que el requerimiento llegue a las personas correctas.
    23 KB (3,711 words) - 21:03, 19 September 2016
  • ...que esta sección es ahora redundante en Fedora y sólo es necesaria para EPEL. Normalmente esto sólo contiene: La eliminación de <code>%{buildroot}</code> ya no es necesaria, excepto para EPEL 5.
    70 KB (10,913 words) - 20:59, 19 September 2016
  • ...i will look for updates that have been in testing for N days (fedora: N=7, epel: N=14), and will add a comment notifying the maintainer that the update is - Disabled strict critical path procedures for EPEL
    60 KB (8,723 words) - 13:03, 26 August 2010
  • EPEL, default: F
    7 KB (874 words) - 09:20, 20 January 2016
  • # [[User:Stardust85 | Michel Samia]] (packager) - I'd like to see gradle in EPEL
    7 KB (929 words) - 12:44, 6 February 2019
  • == EPEL SysV Initscripts == ...scripts, for use and inclusion in packages for EPEL 5 and 6. Packages for EPEL 7 should use systemd units as documented in the [[Packaging:Systemd|Fedora
    27 KB (4,181 words) - 00:49, 10 November 2015
  • ...t defined in EPEL5. People wanting to share one spec file with Fedora and EPEL need to conditionalize use of the macros. That can be done like this:
    7 KB (1,103 words) - 17:03, 6 October 2010
  • = OpenStack in EPEL = The OpenStack Folsom was retired from EPEL 6.
    1 KB (158 words) - 20:25, 7 September 2017
  • ...age of completion: 100% - all required packages are in Rawhide and also in EPEL-6
    6 KB (879 words) - 17:09, 7 February 2011
  • = RHEL entitlements for EPEL maintainers = .... This will allow you to a RHEL7 entitlement to help develop and test your EPEL packages.
    320 bytes (47 words) - 18:05, 25 April 2016
  • ...t start with el and are followed by a number are for EPEL. The branch for EPEL 6 is <code>el6/master</code>. ...er within Fedora we have the concept of different access rights per Fedora/EPEL release. This manifests in the source control at the branch level. Becaus
    10 KB (1,593 words) - 20:48, 1 August 2018
  • 欲为 Fedora 和 [[EPEL]] 构建软件包,您需要使用 [[Using_the_Koji_build_system|Koji]]。 ...求添加该包为 buildroot。对于 EPEL 打包者,你必须使用 ''EPEL'' 组件向正确的人发送请求。
    20 KB (848 words) - 09:52, 14 February 2019
  • ...lopment announcements for evolution data server, gtk2, and a heads up that EPEL 6 will be moving to beta soon. In Ambassador news, one new Ambassador this * Fix the testing status tooltips for EPEL (#486)
    20 KB (2,897 words) - 14:16, 13 January 2011
  • Install the epel-release package from any mirror: rpm -Uvh http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-8.noarch.rpm
    2 KB (346 words) - 23:17, 7 February 2013
  • In announcements, we have the release of EPEL 6! The Ambassadors group welcomed two new member this weeks, both represent ====Announcing EPEL 6====
    18 KB (2,519 words) - 17:54, 20 January 2011
  • = Joining the EPEL SIG = There are many ways to join in and help out with EPEL. A few are listed below. If you think of another way to help out the SIG, f
    1 KB (229 words) - 14:32, 11 April 2012
  • ...and in the ''updates-testing'' repositories for Fedora 13, 14, and 15, and EPEL 5 and 6.
    11 KB (1,881 words) - 18:40, 6 June 2019
  • = EPEL Quality Assurance = EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assura
    1 KB (182 words) - 19:46, 19 March 2011
  • = EPEL Package Maintainers = ...reports, update packages and add new packages to the collection as needed. EPEL packagers are members of the Fedora "packagers" group.
    4 KB (619 words) - 17:30, 31 August 2017
  • = EPEL Updates Policy = ...general EPEL package guidelines, refer to the [[EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies|EPEL Guidelines and Policy]] page.
    2 KB (358 words) - 18:28, 1 March 2017
  • * EPEL/EPEL-testing enabled
    952 bytes (133 words) - 17:27, 8 April 2011
  • 14, and 15, and EPEL 5 and 6.
    39 KB (5,701 words) - 16:08, 11 March 2011
  • | style="color: #818144" | that can probably get sorted out, maybe via epel?
    58 KB (7,236 words) - 09:04, 18 September 2016
  • ...6.html </ref> the availability of the first Tunisian mirror for Fedora and EPEL <ref> http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist </ref>
    45 KB (6,665 words) - 14:59, 24 March 2011
  • ...has a yum repository for some packages that cannot be distributed in RHEL/EPEL. At this time, packages that are in the repo, but not installed anywhere wi
    2 KB (414 words) - 16:14, 21 June 2011
  • For example if we wanted to create the EPEL tags to build XFCE , we would do the following: koji add-tag epel6-xfce48 --parent=dist-6E-epel-build --arches="i686,x86_64,ppc64"
    3 KB (450 words) - 17:50, 3 November 2015
  • koji build --scratch dist-6E-epel ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fedora-insight-theme-<verrel>.src.rpm</pre>
    3 KB (497 words) - 21:17, 29 August 2011
  • ...started with OpenStack on Fedora 17]] and [[Getting started with OpenStack EPEL]].
    15 KB (2,301 words) - 13:33, 15 November 2012
  • == What about packages not part of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? What is EPEL? == ...ompatible rebuilds called [[EPEL|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux]], or EPEL.
    10 KB (1,568 words) - 08:31, 16 January 2012
  • ...devel/2011-July/002616.html</ref>. James said he would check if it was the EPEL SIG or individual maintainers who were interested<ref>http://fedorahosted.o
    44 KB (6,342 words) - 02:16, 12 August 2011
  • = Paquetes Adicionales para Linux Empresarial (EPEL) = Bienvenido al hogar del Grupo de Interés Especial de EPEL.
    6 KB (930 words) - 14:16, 17 January 2017
  • = About EPEL = EPEL was started because many Fedora contributors wanted to use the Fedora packa
    5 KB (848 words) - 00:36, 5 January 2012
  • Yourls requires EPEL if running on RHEL or CentOS. ...f using RHEL or CentOS, enable [[EPEL]] by following the instructions at [[EPEL/FAQ#howtouse]]</li>
    4 KB (660 words) - 10:00, 8 October 2015
  • {{lang|en|es|ja|zh_cn(简体中文)|page=EPEL}}
    47 bytes (8 words) - 12:49, 11 December 2011
  • = 企业版 Linux 附加软件包(EPEL) = 欢迎您来到企业版 Linux 附加软件包(EPEL)特别兴趣小组首页!
    7 KB (354 words) - 01:13, 20 June 2018
  • = 加入 EPEL 特别兴趣小组 = ...的列表。如果您有更好的想法,请通过电子邮件列表与 EPEL 小组的管理员交流。
    1 KB (31 words) - 19:33, 2 February 2017
  • = EPEL Package Maintainers = ...reports, update packages and add new packages to the collection as needed. EPEL packagers are members of the Fedora "packagers" group.
    4 KB (623 words) - 22:35, 25 August 2015
  • ...|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux||/pub/epel||Please use this to mirror EPEL
    19 KB (1,961 words) - 12:49, 15 November 2017
  • ...mplementation of secondary architectures and doing Release Engineering for EPEL. Dennis hold a Bachelor in Information Technology (Data Communications) fr ...Fedora, having lead the Fedora [[Docs Project]] Committee, a founder of [[EPEL]], wiki team member, and so forth. He is active in community building, writ
    26 KB (4,105 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016
  • == 什么是 EPEL? == EPEL (企业版 Linux 附加软件包) 是一个由 Fedora 社区志愿者推动
    20 KB (3,230 words) - 01:29, 17 January 2013
  • * On subsequent syncs, got this error from the /pub/epel tree: * upload of initial bucket for EPEL took real 651m57.042s, /pub/fedora took real 892m52.286s.
    6 KB (916 words) - 23:35, 4 June 2012
  • ...Notare che questa sezione è ridondante in Fedora mentre è necessaria per EPEL. Tipicamente contiene solo: Se si hanno necessità più complesse o di compatibilità con EPEL, allora possono servire.
    68 KB (9,692 words) - 20:59, 19 September 2016
  • ...modules and projects are being packaged up for the fedora repositories,and EPEL.
    771 bytes (113 words) - 15:47, 21 June 2012
  • ...ere that page comes into conflict with this one, in the case of Fedora and EPEL, this page takes precedence: in the case of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and ot
    12 KB (2,035 words) - 13:41, 18 September 2016
  • ...t packages are not pushed which would break dependencies within Fedora (or EPEL).
    10 KB (1,632 words) - 16:58, 15 February 2018
  • ...ging macros above. There are chances those macros might get backported to EPEL.}}
    2 KB (328 words) - 14:18, 28 May 2017
  • ...统中的 mod_python 模块不支持非基本认证方式,所以目前 EPEL 5 的 Koji-web中,Kerberos 认证机制不能正常工作。参见 [https
    36 KB (2,249 words) - 08:46, 5 March 2016
  • product = Fedora/Fedora EPEL ...ined [fedora-all] bug may be used rather than one for each Fedora version (EPEL trackers are always separate to Fedora currently). For combined trackers, j
    3 KB (494 words) - 10:18, 31 July 2012
  • ==== Package GitLab in Fedora/EPEL ==== ''Summary of idea:'' To package [http://gitlab.org/ GitLab] for Fedora and EPEL (if possible).
    31 KB (4,826 words) - 21:39, 19 September 2016
  • ...ack/rhel-6-openstack-via-epel-nova-and-glance-on-kvm/ RHEL 6 Openstack via EPEL Nova and Glance on KVM]
    6 KB (821 words) - 02:44, 14 July 2012
  • = OpenStack in EPEL = The OpenStack Folsom was retired from EPEL 6.
    173 bytes (25 words) - 10:22, 5 August 2014
  • ...nstack-utils package] with other support utilities for OpenStack in Fedora/EPEL. = EPEL =
    5 KB (661 words) - 02:46, 14 July 2012
  • = OpenStack Essex was pushed to EPEL = After a couple of weeks testing in preview repos and epel-testing,
    3 KB (363 words) - 18:49, 8 May 2012
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 01:14, 10 May 2012
  • |14.30-15.00||Sirko Kemter (fedora)|| EPEL
    3 KB (402 words) - 15:14, 23 March 2019
  • The OZ VM guest builder was updated to 0.8.0 in Fedora 16,17 and EPEL 6 == Diablo on EPEL ==
    3 KB (404 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2012
  • ...considered the most powerful IPsec implementation available in Fedora and EPEL.
    2 KB (323 words) - 09:44, 27 May 2012
  • Nova updates for Fedora 16, 17, EPEL 6 and rawhide, were released for
    4 KB (635 words) - 21:13, 19 September 2016
  • ''EPEL 5/6:''<br /> ''EPEL 5/6'':<br />
    9 KB (1,184 words) - 19:32, 14 October 2016
  • [[Getting started with OpenStack EPEL]] for RHEL and derivatives
    241 bytes (30 words) - 23:40, 1 December 2012
  • Enterprise Linux and EPEL do. Additionally, compatibility with EPEL, but are not required to do so.
    20 KB (2,980 words) - 20:31, 5 May 2017
  • <big>'''This page is mostly deprecated now except for EPEL: Fedora Haskell now tracks chosen Stackage LTS major versions'''</big>
    2 KB (209 words) - 03:57, 23 May 2019
  • All Essex packages were updated accordingly in Fedora 17 and EPEL 6
    5 KB (614 words) - 17:35, 25 July 2012
  • In Fedora and EPEL, the [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/cloud/2012-July/001574.html
    3 KB (390 words) - 00:40, 11 August 2012
  • EPEL is currently in beta phase against RHEL7 GA. This FAQ tries to answer some See: [ http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/SRPMS/repoview/ ]
    2 KB (296 words) - 08:33, 21 August 2014
  • 1. Q: What versions of Fedora and EPEL use or will use Bodhi? A: Fedora utilizes Bodhi as of Fedora 7. EPEL now utilizes Koji and Bodhi.
    12 KB (1,883 words) - 01:33, 23 February 2013
  • ...tbed, Fedora as part of real infrastructure (ovirt-node). Special note for EPEL.
    2 KB (293 words) - 13:50, 22 July 2013
  • == Folsom in EPEL == We ran a test day on 26 Oct for Folsom on EPEL based on
    4 KB (580 words) - 13:04, 26 November 2012
  • | F18 retrospective || Releng meeting? || Bug review|| EPEL discussion * EPEL discussion
    14 KB (2,054 words) - 13:40, 31 January 2013
  • == Folsom update for Fedora 18 and EPEL == [http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/openstack-grizzly/epel-6/ side repository]
    3 KB (400 words) - 13:59, 21 December 2012
  • == EPEL para colaboradores == ...| mantener paquetes EPEL como parte de un trabajo]]. Más detalles en el [[EPEL/FAQ#Contributing_to_EPEL|apartado de Preguntas frecuentes sobre el contribu
    1 KB (210 words) - 14:59, 27 December 2012
  • In Fedora 18 and later, as well as EPEL 6, the following macros are defined for you:
    15 KB (2,431 words) - 17:25, 30 January 2013
  • ...ff and on discussions about the state of packages and their versions in in EPEL. * https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2012-October/msg00015.html
    5 KB (752 words) - 22:49, 9 January 2013
  • EPEL, default: F
    7 KB (880 words) - 14:20, 14 February 2013
  • * must be package-able in fedora and EPEL repos
    3 KB (558 words) - 23:09, 16 January 2013
  • The status of Erlang and related packages in Fedora/EPEL is shown at [[SIGs/Erlang#Current_packages|Erlang SIG]] page.
    6 KB (853 words) - 19:12, 13 May 2013
  • = Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) = Benvenuti nella home dell'EPEL Special Interest Group.
    6 KB (878 words) - 06:03, 10 July 2016
  • #REDIRECT [[Architectures/PowerPC/WorkQueue for EPEL 7]]
    56 bytes (6 words) - 09:49, 12 March 2015
  • = OpenStack in EPEL = The OpenStack Folsom was retired from EPEL 6.
    173 bytes (25 words) - 10:24, 5 August 2014
  • ...t packages are not pushed which would break dependencies within Fedora (or EPEL).
    12 KB (1,909 words) - 16:58, 15 February 2018
  • * [http://www.redmine.org/ redmine]: ruby, not packaged yet for epel. * when a bug is mis-assigned to an epel pkg (in fedora) can't reassign to rhel <-- This is irrelevant to Fedora
    6 KB (981 words) - 22:07, 24 September 2013
  • In the future, oat package should be in Fedora (targeting Fedora 19) and EPEL for
    8 KB (1,290 words) - 02:24, 9 May 2013
  • ...tails on how to do Provides and Requires Filtering for EPEL 4 and 5, see [[EPEL:Packaging#Perl_Provides_and_Requires_Filtering]]. At a minimum you should h ...t defined in EPEL5. People wanting to share one spec file with Fedora and EPEL need to conditionalize use of the macros. That can be done like this:
    8 KB (1,220 words) - 17:51, 30 April 2013
  • ...ля RHEL определяются только для пакетов из EPEL.
    15 KB (380 words) - 21:03, 8 November 2018
  • .../wiki/About_EPEL#Academia_Perspective Academia Perspective], packaging for EPEL will give me the opportunity to pick up new skills and have real world expe
    4 KB (586 words) - 08:41, 4 May 2013
  • ...nd: #407a40">mizmo</th><td class="text" colspan="2" style="color: #407a40">epel is part of the world we want fedora to define</td></tr> ...07a40">mizmo</th><td class="text" colspan="2" style="color: #407a40">today epel is treated as if its part of fedora</td></tr>
    41 KB (6,582 words) - 01:16, 10 August 2013
  • ...ven't already done so, [[EPEL#How_can_I_use_these_extra_packages.3F|enable EPEL]], then run this as <code>root</code>:
    4 KB (606 words) - 15:08, 4 September 2015
  • * '''Week 9:''' start packaging it for fedora and fedora-epel
    6 KB (987 words) - 14:45, 1 May 2013
  • repmgr is currently not packaged in Fedora/EPEL.
    4 KB (680 words) - 03:23, 13 August 2013
  • ...oposal is aiming to package GitLab and all its dependencies for Fedora and EPEL. ===Packaging for Fedora/EPEL===
    14 KB (2,260 words) - 20:57, 19 September 2016
  • ...dependencies) from its Gemfile. Many will require packaging for fedora and EPEL. After all the dependencies have been resolved and tested, they would need
    11 KB (1,783 words) - 21:38, 2 May 2013
  • ...Fedora Collection (Fedora 軟體集) 或是為 Fedora 建置系統中的 [[EPEL]] 建置軟體包,你需要採用 [[Using_the_Koji_build_system|Koji]]。 ...根基的凌駕之意)。至於 EPEL 中的軟體包,你必須使用 ''epel'' 作為 componet 才能讓請求發送給對的負責人。
    23 KB (844 words) - 14:34, 18 September 2016
  • An effort to package GitLab for Fedora and EPEL. In this page you will find all the relevant information on how to get invo TODO: Add column of EPEL.
    1 KB (218 words) - 09:12, 5 May 2016
  • ...hasta la [[Schedule|Congelación de funcionalidades]]), Rawhide (master) y EPEL (el5, el6, epel7). Cuando necesite añadir paquetes desde EPEL a cualquier release RHEL, retirelo únicamente una vez el paquete haya sido
    5 KB (692 words) - 21:18, 17 October 2016
  • ...s are with a great (the best!) cloud image and OpenStack (on Fedora and in EPEL). Also, doing QA of both. Tries to provide actual real-world cloud experien
    21 KB (3,335 words) - 13:52, 14 October 2013
  • * [[EPEL:Packaging?rd=Packaging:EPEL|EPEL specific guidelines]]
    2 KB (319 words) - 20:47, 19 September 2016
  • ** One syntax for Fedora and EPEL
    8 KB (1,068 words) - 09:54, 15 December 2015
  • ...and providers. For projects that are not currently packaged within Fedora/EPEL, we may need to locate a kind person to ensure testing. These include: * [[EPEL]]: Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux
    30 KB (4,592 words) - 11:57, 8 October 2015
  • ...| Ensure gc tracking is off when invoking weakref callbacks || Python34 in EPEL
    15 KB (2,144 words) - 14:28, 28 May 2019
  • == EPEL Branches == EPEL 7 branches can be requested via [[Package SCM admin requests]].
    211 KB (24,543 words) - 18:17, 12 September 2014
  • * [[EPEL]]: Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux ...PEL. The goal is to share as much content as possible with downstream RHEL/EPEL documentation, using the same format and toolchain (DocBook, Publican).
    19 KB (2,977 words) - 19:55, 28 March 2014
  • | EPEL 6 || 1.4.1 | [[EPEL]] 5 || 1.0.1
    3 KB (454 words) - 00:32, 23 December 2013
  • The following packages are available in Fedora 21 and later and EPEL 6 and later:
    8 KB (1,299 words) - 14:19, 11 August 2015
  • ...d there is no reason not to recommend it over %setup everywhere except for EPEL %autosetup with a note that EPEL package maintainers (before EL7) should continue using %setup or wrap it in
    703 bytes (111 words) - 15:30, 12 October 2017
  • and Cloud WGs (together with the CentOS and EPEL communities).
    20 KB (2,971 words) - 02:43, 30 October 2017
  • Mock 1.2.20 is just bugfix release, which use correct gpg keys for epel in epel* configs.
    89 bytes (15 words) - 10:39, 17 August 2016
  • 4 - package it and make it available into fedora/fedora epel respository's <br> '''Week 9:''' start packaging it for fedora and fedora-epel <br>
    5 KB (735 words) - 15:10, 20 March 2014
  • ...r Mono has been built for all primary and secondary architectures, and for Epel, we enable the deletion of the monolite binaries again in the spec file.
    25 KB (3,491 words) - 14:41, 29 July 2015
  • ===1.2 EPEL=== Install the EPEL repository
    4 KB (613 words) - 17:54, 31 March 2014
  • EPEL.
    4 KB (616 words) - 11:05, 10 April 2014
  • ...PEL7 will get varnish4. It would be a shame to be behind both upstream and EPEL.
    10 KB (1,655 words) - 22:03, 4 May 2014
  • ...ls also make it easy to use the same spec for older releases of Fedora and EPEL.</li>.
    36 KB (5,783 words) - 21:27, 17 October 2016
  • PowerPC Work Queue for [[Architectures/PowerPC/WorkQueue_for_EPEL_7|EPEL 7]].
    446 bytes (65 words) - 09:56, 12 March 2015
  • 'epel-6': {'id': '0608b895', 'v3': True}}
    5 KB (816 words) - 12:59, 17 July 2014
  • ...get stats on the number of vulns that were embargoed that affected Fedora/EPEL. (carried over)
    2 KB (339 words) - 19:55, 19 August 2016
  • ...odhi], on the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel epel-devel] mailing list and the relevant [http://bugzilla.redhat.com Bugzilla] == Using the epel-testing repository ==
    6 KB (971 words) - 14:22, 29 September 2015
  • * Stephen Smoogen (EPEL, Fedora Infrastructure) (Travel sponsored by Red Hat separate from Fedora b
    1 KB (167 words) - 12:15, 7 October 2014
  • = EPEL faster repo ideas = This is a container wiki page for ideas around a separate repo from EPEL that has different policies and expectations. Note that this is all just id
    3 KB (432 words) - 00:54, 8 September 2014
  • * Add an 'Fedora urgent' type to bodhi2 that is like 'Fedora' and 'Fedora EPEL'
    2 KB (338 words) - 21:38, 27 August 2015
  • Para compilar pacotes para a coleção Fedora ou [[EPEL]] no sistema de compilação do Fedora você precisa usar o [[Using_the_Ko ...UILDROOT override. Para pacotes em EPEL, você tem que usar o componente ''EPEL''.
    23 KB (3,805 words) - 00:29, 21 February 2018
  • This is a shorthand list of items we are needing to cover for building EPEL-8 in Fedora Infrastructure for the Fiscal Year 2020. * Make a version of EPEL available by end of March for the beta of RHEL-8.
    10 KB (1,634 words) - 12:37, 14 May 2019
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]
    48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
  • ...dora packaging guidelines -> also available in main Fedora repositories (& EPEL if desired)
    4 KB (541 words) - 06:24, 17 June 2015
  • [[EPEL/FAQ/zh-cn]]<BR> ====企业版Linux附加软件包项目组EPEL====
    13 KB (1,254 words) - 12:03, 13 January 2015
  • Note, that EPEL or other third party repositories may have (and are encouraged to have) a d
    5 KB (838 words) - 17:36, 28 May 2015
  • ...stro/lxqt/ Heliocastro's copr is the mirror packages in main repository to EPEL and F21 for now.]
    6 KB (893 words) - 11:40, 25 May 2016
  • * Target platform is RHEL/CentOS7 with EPEL * It needs to be possible to package the final project for Fedora/EPEL, i.e. there may not be bundled libraries included
    27 KB (4,079 words) - 15:01, 12 March 2016
  • #** branches: fedora and epel release branches that you want to target = EPEL package lifecycle =
    11 KB (1,635 words) - 22:19, 20 March 2015
  • = Pacotes Adicionais para Enterprise Linux (EPEL) = Bem-vindo ao lar do Grupo EPEL.
    6 KB (950 words) - 01:48, 29 October 2016
  • ...s and all their dependencies as rpms and get them reviewed and pushed into epel and then deploy them on vm's. We create dev instances in openstack cloud in
    3 KB (429 words) - 20:53, 6 May 2015
  • = EPEL meeting process = This guide explains how to manage and run a EPEL IRC meeting. Many of the steps here could well apply to other groups that h
    4 KB (726 words) - 18:36, 19 July 2017
  • Everything else in the main Fedora repos, as well as everything in EPEL. ...any prebuilt binaries will have been compiled against a specific Fedora or EPEL ABI.
    7 KB (1,018 words) - 06:15, 17 June 2015
  • ...=1132001 BZ 1132001] which attached bug reports to fedora-all, EPEL 7, and EPEL 6. The problem exists upstream and the upstream developers are [https://li
    5 KB (696 words) - 19:20, 18 June 2015
  • ...ry. (These are also necessary to allow for a nodejs010/nodejs012 split in EPEL, so will get done anyway.)
    7 KB (1,064 words) - 08:42, 6 August 2015
  • ...age SIGs to provide the following for at least Fedora, and potentially for EPEL (if SIG members are interested in that):
    12 KB (1,791 words) - 00:53, 18 September 2015
  • === EPEL 说明 === EPEL 不包含 macros.gconf2,所以请按此说明操作: [[Packaging:EPEL#GConf]]
    24 KB (1,211 words) - 21:17, 17 October 2016
  • * Theoretically a lot of EPEL could be eliminated if fedora containers are the way to deliver newer softw
    6 KB (1,013 words) - 07:19, 24 August 2015
  • ; [[EPEL|EPEL]] ...flict with or replace packages in the base Enterprise Linux distributions. EPEL uses much of the same infrastructure as Fedora, including buildsystem, bugz
    13 KB (2,112 words) - 21:36, 19 September 2016
  • ...ted, if you do not (for example you wish to maintain a existing package in EPEL), the owner will be given 7 days to approve or reject your request and then
    5 KB (738 words) - 09:05, 29 August 2018
  • ...e Union || Smoogen, Stephen || https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/flock2017/EPEL-FLOCK2017.odp || ...Future || Smoogen, Stephen || https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/flock2017/EPEL-WorkShop2017.odp ||
    5 KB (627 words) - 15:51, 23 March 2019
  • ...бы собрать пакеты для коллекции Fedora или [[EPEL]], вам нужен [[PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji|Koji]]. ...buildroot override. For packages in EPEL, you have to use the component ''epel'' to get the request to the right persons.
    27 KB (2,214 words) - 07:25, 22 December 2015
  • To provide the utmost secure operating environment to Fedora and EPEL users by:
    289 bytes (39 words) - 22:53, 10 June 2016
  • ...is to provided updated packages for EPEL that would otherwise violate the EPEL update policy. The common repo contains updated libraries common to the va
    490 bytes (73 words) - 14:03, 7 January 2016
  • ...what to do for EPEL branches EL-4 and EL-5 can be found here: [[Packaging:EPEL#PHP_ABI_Check_Handling]]}} ...ons of Fedora and RHEL/EPEL-6, but does NOT work for RHEL/EPEL-5. For RHEL/EPEL-5 packages, you will need to use Requires: php-common >= $VERSION.
    16 KB (2,243 words) - 19:14, 14 October 2016
  • ...er:Ausil|Dennis Gilmore]] - FESCo member, Fedora Release Engineering lead, EPEL founder, Former Board Member, Contributor and owner of all the release engi
    4 KB (682 words) - 12:51, 23 January 2019
  • This is the work flow for helping fix security bugs in Fedora and EPEL.
    4 KB (664 words) - 19:08, 19 August 2016
  • ...odule, you must build-require the perl-generators. (This does not apply to EPEL ≤ 7 where the functionality is provided by rpm-build.)
    11 KB (1,781 words) - 17:17, 28 April 2016
  • ...a.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110823#c8 dummy perl-generators package into EPEL to ease porting from Fedora] ...ners will have to adjust their spec files when merging them from Fedora to EPEL.
    9 KB (1,350 words) - 17:29, 3 January 2017
  • ...ère est en contradiction avec la présente page, dans le cas de Fedora et EPEL, c'est cette page qui prévaut : dans le cas de Red Hat Enterprise Linux
    16 KB (2,521 words) - 13:41, 18 September 2016
  • * encourage creation of EPEL branches for existing packages
    7 KB (997 words) - 12:24, 11 May 2016
  • ...ese are now available in [http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/x86_64/c/ EPEL 7] || == Fedora Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux (EPEL) WishList ==
    71 KB (9,762 words) - 15:49, 25 June 2018
  • * [[EPEL]]: Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux
    15 KB (2,243 words) - 13:48, 20 February 2017
  • # Retrieve information about all the packages in a collection (Fedora, Fedora EPEL, Fedora Docker) # Retrieve all bugs about a certain package in Fedora or Fedora EPEL where the bug is not closed.
    3 KB (497 words) - 10:21, 14 November 2016
  • | epel || 755 || no || no || no
    28 KB (3,359 words) - 20:44, 15 February 2017
  • * users are not allowed to create random el* and epel* branches (to prevent conflicts with the official ones)
    7 KB (1,145 words) - 09:42, 28 April 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Tasks/LongTerm]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 16:29, 16 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Bug Day 2014]]
    39 bytes (5 words) - 16:34, 16 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/JeffSheltren/EPELMeetingTime]]
    55 bytes (5 words) - 16:39, 16 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List]]
    44 bytes (6 words) - 22:39, 28 March 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL Package Wish List/Japanese]]
    53 bytes (7 words) - 22:39, 28 March 2017
  • ...rict as they cannot contain any breaking changes; therefore, a package’s EPEL branches are only updated with bug fixes, security fixes, and features whic
    14 KB (2,354 words) - 19:27, 18 July 2017
  • ...FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7e8572ac74 An EPEL-7 update providing perl-interpreter to EPEL-7] ...FEDORA-EPEL-2018-35805e33b6 An EPEL-6 update providing perl-interpreter to EPEL-6]
    8 KB (1,104 words) - 12:31, 1 February 2018
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports]]
    34 bytes (4 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week01]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week02]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week03]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:12, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week04]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week05]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week06]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week07]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week08]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week09]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week10]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week11]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week17]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week19]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week20]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week21]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week22]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week23]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week24]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week25]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week26]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week27]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week28]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:13, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week29]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week30]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week31]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week32]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week33]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week34]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week35]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week36]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week37]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week38]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week39]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week40]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week41]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week42]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week43]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week44]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week45]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week46]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week47]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week48]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week49]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:14, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week50]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:15, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week51]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:15, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Reports/Week52]]
    41 bytes (5 words) - 19:15, 1 August 2017
  • #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/SteeringCommittee/Voting]]
    51 bytes (5 words) - 19:19, 1 August 2017
  • | EPEL For the Future | EPEL State of the Union
    7 KB (812 words) - 15:52, 23 March 2019
  • ...e given to pentesting tools not already packaged in the Fedora repos or in EPEL such as:
    10 KB (1,550 words) - 05:41, 30 March 2018
  • #REDIRECT [[EPEL]]
    18 bytes (2 words) - 15:39, 23 September 2017
  • # [[User:Stardust85 | Michel Samia]] (packager) - I'd like to see gradle in EPEL
    8 KB (1,121 words) - 23:11, 22 February 2018
  • ...|Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux||/pub/epel||Please use this to mirror EPEL
    19 KB (2,982 words) - 00:17, 12 March 2018
  • * Install python2-grokmirror (python-grokmirror in <= F27 or EPEL)
    2 KB (307 words) - 19:27, 2 April 2018
  • ...ed it, but EPEL5 did not as it was supplied automatically via magic in the epel-rpm-macros package. The [[Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections|Packaging
    7 KB (1,164 words) - 21:09, 7 September 2018
  • * [[EPEL]]: Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux
    10 KB (1,493 words) - 20:01, 17 August 2018
  • ...a assignment etc.. Currently it is possible to override bugzilla owner for EPEL branches via manually reviewed Pull Request to a specific Pagure repom howe
    6 KB (1,013 words) - 22:06, 10 January 2019
  • ...as gemas de su proyecto estén disponibles en los repositorios de Fedora / EPEL.
    7 KB (1,051 words) - 16:58, 22 December 2018
  • No software under the SSPLv1 may be included in Fedora (including EPEL and COPRs).
    30 KB (4,900 words) - 15:57, 15 January 2019
  • The change moves EPEL composes to biannual based composes and adds an latest packages tagged for a particular EPEL release (example epel-7)
    4 KB (681 words) - 18:28, 27 February 2019
  • EPEL 7:
    11 KB (1,651 words) - 13:27, 28 February 2019
  • [[Infrastructure_2020/EPEL-8]]
    194 bytes (13 words) - 20:00, 25 February 2019
  • 30 KB (991 words) - 07:18, 29 March 2019

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)