From Fedora Project Wiki

  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    6 KB (1,016 words) - 20:02, 22 April 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    11 KB (1,849 words) - 16:09, 21 January 2021
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    13 KB (2,098 words) - 16:16, 1 February 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    12 KB (1,418 words) - 11:56, 7 February 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
    9 KB (1,371 words) - 02:29, 29 January 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    11 KB (1,840 words) - 21:51, 12 February 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,519 words) - 20:37, 12 June 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    13 KB (2,054 words) - 15:51, 2 February 2021
  • sig fedora-10 && age < 12 weeks :: keep sig fedora-11 && age < 12 weeks :: keep
    11 KB (1,746 words) - 17:51, 3 November 2015
  • This page is [[SIGs/Medical|Fedora Medical SIG]]'s COVID-19 page.
    4 KB (477 words) - 17:57, 17 May 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,790 words) - 15:02, 2 March 2018
  • ...o be beneficial to the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Respins-SIG Respins SIG] as it nicely aligns with their objective of providing a simple method for ...ora Workstation. Nevertheless, we are open to collaborating with all spins/SIG to transition their build pipelines to Image Builder. However, for the init
    9 KB (1,454 words) - 21:20, 28 September 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,667 words) - 08:20, 24 July 2015
  • * Other developers: Negligible work outside Haskell SIG, but the SIG can try to help resolve any issues which should arise. [done] Very few packages with any Haskell dependencies outside the Haskell SIG.
    9 KB (1,477 words) - 21:01, 3 July 2017
  • * [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-02/kde-sig.2010-03-02-14.02.html Meeting minutes] * [http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-02/kde-sig.2010-03-02-14.02.log.html Full log]
    3 KB (381 words) - 09:10, 18 September 2016
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    3 KB (341 words) - 06:21, 22 April 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,677 words) - 05:24, 12 July 2019
  • = Perl for Server Spin/SIG =
    3 KB (342 words) - 12:27, 20 July 2022
  • [11:03] *** Kevin_Kofler sets the channel topic to "KDE SIG Meeting - [[SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2008-06-24]] - Init". [11:03] <Kevin_Kofler> KDE SIG Meeting start. Who's present?
    16 KB (2,471 words) - 08:10, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,679 words) - 19:53, 30 July 2019
  • {{admon/important|Page moved|Games SIG has a new documentation page at [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/gamin = Contributing roles in the Fedora Games SIG =
    15 KB (2,210 words) - 09:30, 21 April 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,519 words) - 14:13, 17 May 2021
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    3 KB (339 words) - 06:23, 22 April 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    13 KB (2,128 words) - 17:22, 21 January 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    6 KB (1,015 words) - 13:20, 29 January 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (1,102 words) - 14:03, 22 June 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG Owners of packages that fail to rebuild, mainly perl-sig users, will be asked using Bugzilla to fix or remove their packages from th
    11 KB (1,572 words) - 08:47, 1 March 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
    10 KB (1,573 words) - 13:49, 26 August 2015
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...G, though we are open to support from any of the few packagers outside the SIG
    10 KB (1,509 words) - 14:53, 12 March 2019
  • * [[:Category:Fonts_SIG| 폰트 SIG]] {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (656 words) - 17:14, 26 April 2021
  • ...thin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional /area, accepted by the SIG
    10 KB (1,422 words) - 13:05, 14 February 2022
  • = Set inital-cc to 'perl-sig' = ...tial-cc list for bugzilla. This can be done by adding the user <code>perl-sig</code> to the initial CC list.
    10 KB (1,479 words) - 00:50, 19 February 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,362 words) - 12:09, 11 July 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,542 words) - 17:04, 3 October 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,273 words) - 19:55, 26 October 2017
  • While separate from the [[SIGs/AI-ML|AI/ML SIG]], we do share communication channels for now. If you're interested, please * [https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/tags/c/project/7/ai-ml-sig #ai-ml-sig on Fedora's Discourse instance]
    9 KB (1,069 words) - 17:52, 14 January 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,320 words) - 08:46, 17 October 2016
  • Changes will be driven by Python SIG, but a few packages may fail to build (with the failure message providing a This is a multi-release effort tracked in Python SIG's [[FinalizingFedoraSwitchtoPython3|"Finalizing Fedora Switch to Python3" d
    10 KB (1,552 words) - 15:01, 8 June 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    13 KB (2,111 words) - 09:43, 30 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
    10 KB (1,547 words) - 14:51, 2 March 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (959 words) - 14:48, 2 March 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,603 words) - 15:16, 26 April 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,280 words) - 12:04, 8 August 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * libreoffice-SIG
    12 KB (1,925 words) - 14:31, 12 September 2023
  • == SIG deny list ==
    11 KB (1,600 words) - 18:21, 3 August 2022
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}} ...ses should be notified to the fontconfig maintainer and the Fedora [[Fonts SIG mailing lists|fonts list]], so the font family split can be eventually hidd
    11 KB (1,643 words) - 20:01, 21 December 2018
  • | Server SIG Pow-Wow|| || || || | Haskell SIG meeting|| || || ||
    17 KB (2,234 words) - 21:57, 1 April 2018
  • * Responsible WG: ARM SIG * Proposal owners: The ARM SIG will prepare the changes required for the disk images and u-boot uEFI suppo
    6 KB (973 words) - 16:25, 27 October 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,179 words) - 14:23, 6 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    12 KB (1,879 words) - 04:08, 28 October 2015
  • == SIG blacklists ==
    11 KB (1,634 words) - 22:17, 29 July 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,238 words) - 13:27, 13 August 2015
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,265 words) - 20:51, 28 August 2015
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,225 words) - 19:23, 3 November 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,940 words) - 15:16, 1 July 2017
  • === Fedora SIG KDE Meeting 2008-04-01 === === Fedora SIG Store Meeting 2008-04-02 ===
    16 KB (2,130 words) - 21:36, 20 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,335 words) - 13:00, 10 August 2018
  • ...ll happens. In order to have permission, it has been created in the python-sig group: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/platform-python-sta
    3 KB (471 words) - 09:37, 1 September 2017
  • ...Fedora release. Exceptions will be for bug and security fixes that the KDE-SIG is able to backport.
    3 KB (478 words) - 15:13, 29 April 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    13 KB (2,166 words) - 15:07, 2 March 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can
    14 KB (2,369 words) - 14:46, 2 March 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    11 KB (1,844 words) - 18:10, 2 July 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,270 words) - 15:46, 9 July 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
    10 KB (1,538 words) - 07:51, 25 June 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    12 KB (1,846 words) - 22:50, 13 April 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,207 words) - 18:20, 26 March 2018
  • ...technology, and build upon our vibrant community. So while this is a Pride SIG hosted activity, it's a "Let's have fun!" event for everyone to participate
    3 KB (397 words) - 10:56, 27 January 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,363 words) - 19:03, 21 October 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (978 words) - 13:24, 21 November 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,332 words) - 09:29, 19 February 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,106 words) - 13:32, 26 April 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,507 words) - 19:25, 2 November 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,281 words) - 20:07, 3 January 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,395 words) - 16:41, 20 January 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,431 words) - 07:48, 18 June 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,427 words) - 10:29, 2 October 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,419 words) - 14:16, 4 July 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,439 words) - 02:53, 12 August 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,613 words) - 17:55, 9 June 2020
  • ...ring&short_desc=ghc&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr ghc bugs not CC haskell-sig] * 2007-05-10: Fedora SIG [http://fedoraproject.org/wikiold/SIGs/Haskell?action=recall&rev=1 formed]
    12 KB (1,549 words) - 16:38, 20 February 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,289 words) - 16:15, 13 August 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (2,982 words) - 17:13, 16 November 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,399 words) - 16:49, 27 January 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,205 words) - 19:10, 2 August 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,378 words) - 13:56, 15 February 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,249 words) - 14:04, 20 October 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,366 words) - 19:53, 16 July 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    13 KB (2,135 words) - 03:51, 21 February 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,374 words) - 18:43, 6 January 2021
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,341 words) - 07:25, 1 July 2017
  • ...g that there will be around 200 packages that need such attention. The ELN SIG will be providing guidance and pull-requests to assist with this. ...feedback messaging into the ELN builds so that the maintainers and the ELN SIG will see what was attempted and what failed.
    19 KB (3,148 words) - 21:30, 6 April 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,427 words) - 13:55, 3 February 2020
  • <!-- All fields on this form are required to be accepted by the Spins SIG ...tly under the umbrella of the [[SIGs/SciTech|Fedora Science and Technology SIG]].
    11 KB (1,853 words) - 15:28, 12 October 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,357 words) - 20:53, 20 October 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,469 words) - 13:39, 13 February 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,485 words) - 19:28, 8 March 2019
  • ...rs are outside of groups / SIGs / projects... there's (almost ?) a group / SIG / projct for each and every task you could want to do in Fedora. And who ca ...| bochecha: I agree with your point about how mentors should be part of a SIG, in fact, that's going to be my target
    68 KB (8,780 words) - 08:50, 18 September 2016
  • ** '''Links for more info (if there is any) :''' - Join the [[Ruby SIG]] and/or ping the mentor for more info
    4 KB (569 words) - 20:56, 19 September 2016
  • * [[:Category:Fonts_SIG| Fonts SIG]] {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    7 KB (1,031 words) - 11:09, 29 November 2016
  • ...g that there will be around 200 packages that need such attention. The ELN SIG will be providing guidance and pull-requests to assist with this. ...feedback messaging into the ELN builds so that the maintainers and the ELN SIG will see what was attempted and what failed.
    20 KB (3,215 words) - 12:39, 5 May 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,445 words) - 16:53, 27 January 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (1,113 words) - 20:36, 6 February 2020
  • ...https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/nodejs/SIG.html| Nodejs SIG]] ...https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/nodejs/SIG.html| Nodejs SIG]] and we will help you find the easiest way to bundle your nodejs libraries
    11 KB (1,735 words) - 15:57, 4 January 2021
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,458 words) - 15:47, 2 January 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,384 words) - 19:05, 3 November 2017
  • * [[:Category:Fonts_SIG| Tipos de Letra SIG]] {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    7 KB (1,034 words) - 16:00, 19 August 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,486 words) - 13:09, 31 July 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,612 words) - 15:20, 11 February 2021
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,471 words) - 20:42, 23 September 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,227 words) - 16:31, 15 January 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,354 words) - 19:28, 3 November 2017
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    3 KB (413 words) - 07:26, 23 April 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,467 words) - 03:59, 30 January 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,527 words) - 14:59, 3 December 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    11 KB (1,501 words) - 17:54, 22 July 2019
  • === Fedora SIG KDE Meeting 2008-04-08 ===
    12 KB (1,594 words) - 21:10, 20 September 2016
  • ..., are much less formal. The process for [[Creating_a_Fedora_SIG|creating a SIG]] has no red tape. Different SIGs have different structures; some use forma
    4 KB (530 words) - 20:27, 12 January 2023
  • ...der-width: 0px; background-color: #d8e0eb;"|{{projectline|SIGs|檢視所有特別興趣小組 (SIG)...||Echo-SIGs-48px.png}}
    6 KB (389 words) - 18:15, 2 January 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,477 words) - 08:22, 9 April 2018
  • ...this example (and always link to people or groups)'' [[SIGs/DotNet|DotNet SIG]] - [[User:Rhea|Radka (rhea) Janek]], ... ...el}} & {{fplistfull|example-list}} - Mentors email or mailing list of your SIG.''
    18 KB (2,717 words) - 11:42, 28 January 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Name: [[Haskell_SIG|Haskell SIG]]
    8 KB (1,277 words) - 15:22, 4 August 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,416 words) - 15:57, 27 November 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,477 words) - 13:52, 7 July 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,554 words) - 16:28, 13 August 2019
  • ...levels and areas of concentration. The Fedora [[SIGs/Robotics | Robotics SIG]] focuses on making the latest and greatest robotics software available to ...nt? Writing tutorials? Packaging? The Fedora [[SIGs/Robotics | Robotics SIG]] is always looking for new members. Get in touch with us if you want to h
    8 KB (1,221 words) - 13:13, 1 October 2015
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,604 words) - 18:04, 7 June 2019
  • ...work connectivity as a service". This page tracks [[Cloud SIG|Fedora Cloud SIG]]'s effort to maintain Quantum in Fedora.
    13 KB (1,814 words) - 09:30, 6 October 2015
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,461 words) - 03:01, 12 August 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,582 words) - 16:28, 7 January 2019
  • = Fedora Package Review SIG = This SIG is currently in its infancy and things are still being organized.
    10 KB (1,479 words) - 21:42, 31 December 2018
  • [[SIGs|Специальные группы в проекте Fedora]] (SIG) - другие активности внутри проекта Fedora, к
    6 KB (153 words) - 11:30, 29 November 2016
  • Fedora Language Testing Group [FLTG] is a SIG group of Fedora contributors taking care of language testing in Fedora.
    4 KB (531 words) - 15:55, 30 April 2021
  • === Thursday, April 28 - Cloud SIG Test Day === ...8" | jlaska: I am editing the wiki and was wondering if QA is considered a SIG or a formal project?
    31 KB (3,789 words) - 09:04, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,481 words) - 20:17, 11 December 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,562 words) - 17:26, 11 March 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
    12 KB (1,694 words) - 12:50, 19 February 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,430 words) - 16:30, 16 January 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,401 words) - 15:24, 26 March 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,278 words) - 15:14, 7 February 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,498 words) - 13:49, 7 July 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,674 words) - 10:39, 13 February 2024
  • * Name: [[User:petersen|Jens Petersen]], Fedora Haskell SIG ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,344 words) - 12:53, 10 August 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,641 words) - 19:56, 17 July 2020
  • ...uddies of Budgie organization and a newly proposed [[ SIGs/Budgie | Budgie SIG ]]. Budgie Desktop was introduced in Fedora 37. A Fedora Budgie Spin would ** SIG request: [https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11049 #11049]
    9 KB (1,298 words) - 18:23, 4 January 2023
  • ** SIG: Yes == Determining the Spins SIG workflow ==
    41 KB (5,857 words) - 09:11, 18 September 2016
  • === KDE SIG Packages Status === ...placement KDE panel capable of handling Compiz and Beryl. Other Fedora KDE-SIG packages awaiting review are koverartist, klear, kdebluetooth, and keep. Sp
    16 KB (2,342 words) - 14:22, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,476 words) - 17:18, 21 January 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,312 words) - 19:20, 25 February 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,222 words) - 03:43, 30 July 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,643 words) - 15:49, 2 January 2020
  • * The [[SIGs/Xfce| Xfce SIG]] (Special Interest Group) is a group of Fedora contributors that help imp
    3 KB (574 words) - 22:33, 21 May 2016
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (617 words) - 21:38, 19 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,598 words) - 14:36, 3 February 2021
  • <!-- All fields on this form are required to be accepted by the Spins SIG
    4 KB (526 words) - 19:53, 26 July 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,350 words) - 14:35, 12 September 2023
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    3 KB (422 words) - 07:46, 3 November 2017
  • ...:otaylor| Owen Taylor]], [[User:Ngompa|Neal Gompa]] [on behalf of the KDE SIG] ...d-party repositories must be approved by an active Fedora working group or SIG, or by FESCo. Groups who approve the inclusion of third party repositories
    9 KB (1,348 words) - 08:18, 6 October 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,206 words) - 09:25, 27 September 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    19 KB (2,840 words) - 20:34, 25 August 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,429 words) - 00:43, 16 December 2023
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    4 KB (475 words) - 12:40, 21 November 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,627 words) - 17:32, 17 December 2018
  • ...COSMIC SIG''' || [[User:Rbrue|Ryan Brue]] || A talk on the Fedora COSMIC SIG || Session 1
    7 KB (1,014 words) - 23:42, 22 May 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,373 words) - 16:25, 2 August 2022
  • The Fedora Cloud Working Group and Special Interest Group (SIG) has been busy leading up to Fedora 21. Cloud is now a top-level product fo ...work for Fedora 21, [[Changes/Modular_Kernel_Packaging_for_Cloud|the cloud SIG and kernel team split the kernel]] into two packages. One package contains
    8 KB (1,249 words) - 11:39, 9 October 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Name: [[Haskell_SIG|Haskell SIG]]
    9 KB (1,343 words) - 15:17, 1 March 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,535 words) - 14:35, 26 July 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (1,109 words) - 13:04, 6 March 2018
  • * [[SIGs/KDE| KDE SIG]]
    3 KB (482 words) - 21:42, 17 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,659 words) - 17:32, 9 July 2018
  • ...nsible WG: Workstation WG and Team Silverblue (formerly Atomic Workstation SIG)
    4 KB (539 words) - 13:33, 8 August 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,371 words) - 06:47, 7 January 2019
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (625 words) - 21:38, 19 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,426 words) - 20:30, 20 March 2019
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (622 words) - 15:31, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...er:Ankursinha| Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"]], [[SIGs/NeuroFedora| NeuroFedora SIG]]
    15 KB (2,397 words) - 13:43, 27 January 2021
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,638 words) - 08:06, 21 October 2020
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    4 KB (458 words) - 19:03, 24 March 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (3,228 words) - 13:21, 10 September 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,708 words) - 12:10, 28 June 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,416 words) - 07:15, 25 February 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,360 words) - 20:02, 17 August 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Responsible SIG: Node.js SIG
    15 KB (2,374 words) - 14:20, 17 May 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Name: [https://pagure.io/cloud-sig Fedora Cloud SIG]
    15 KB (2,400 words) - 18:57, 13 June 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,704 words) - 19:21, 20 March 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,793 words) - 20:53, 9 July 2018
  • ...in working on packaging or reviews to help out the [[SIGs/bigdata|Big Data SIG]], this is the page to look at! ...tainers] page to get more information. You could also ask on the Big Data SIG mailing list for assistance and see if you can find a willing helper or spo
    9 KB (1,221 words) - 15:30, 10 September 2016
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (630 words) - 21:38, 19 September 2016
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (625 words) - 15:30, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    21 KB (3,413 words) - 02:47, 21 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,398 words) - 17:37, 19 July 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,858 words) - 16:31, 16 July 2020
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (631 words) - 15:30, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,707 words) - 10:20, 30 September 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Responsible WG: KDE SIG
    9 KB (1,364 words) - 18:21, 22 August 2022
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (631 words) - 15:30, 18 September 2016
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (630 words) - 15:30, 18 September 2016
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    6 KB (659 words) - 15:31, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,583 words) - 14:52, 9 September 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,404 words) - 14:18, 21 May 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,437 words) - 05:58, 11 May 2024
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (634 words) - 21:38, 19 September 2016
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    6 KB (661 words) - 15:31, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,945 words) - 05:38, 12 April 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,899 words) - 11:32, 27 October 2017
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    5 KB (634 words) - 15:30, 18 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    16 KB (2,094 words) - 21:09, 2 May 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,352 words) - 07:01, 22 September 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,801 words) - 13:19, 13 November 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    9 KB (1,440 words) - 19:45, 4 March 2018
  • * Fedora Usability SIG Report: no report
    6 KB (667 words) - 15:31, 18 September 2016
  • ...ized infrastructure. Other groups may form [[Category:SIGs]]. Over time, a SIG which meets criteria for organization, impact, alignment with the Fedora m
    5 KB (637 words) - 11:43, 20 November 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    8 KB (1,164 words) - 09:04, 29 October 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,683 words) - 18:33, 12 July 2018
  • ...acceptance of new packaging sponsors, Special Interest Groups (SIGs) and SIG Oversight, the packaging process, handling and enforcement of maintainer is
    4 KB (583 words) - 12:05, 29 September 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,877 words) - 02:41, 29 June 2018
  • ...rmalizada. Otros grupos pueden formar [[Category:SIGs]]. Con el tiempo, un SIG que cumple con los criterios de organización, impacto y aliniamiento con l
    4 KB (566 words) - 11:31, 29 November 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    4 KB (553 words) - 19:38, 11 February 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,896 words) - 20:34, 23 September 2019
  • | 027 || [[User:jreznik|Jaroslav Reznik]] || || X || || XXL || KDE SIG evil & sysconfig good || ...aslano|Marcela Mašláňová]] || || X || || S || mmaslano@redhat.com || Perl SIG
    11 KB (1,409 words) - 04:13, 11 April 2016
  • * [[SIGs/KDE| KDE SIG]]
    4 KB (507 words) - 21:43, 17 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    18 KB (2,875 words) - 14:14, 10 April 2020
  • ...be a week before Release N+1 goes beta. Here, we shall hold a special Join SIG meeting to agree on what sessions we'll feature in the coming semester. We
    4 KB (542 words) - 18:18, 17 February 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (3,151 words) - 18:32, 21 June 2019
  • ...Matrix Space, please report within Matrix as well as alert the Fedora IRC Sig members by using the !ops command in the main Fedora channel.}} ...ppropriate activity in any Fedora IRC channels please alert the Fedora IRC Sig members by using the !ops command in the main Fedora channel. }}
    26 KB (3,864 words) - 14:16, 25 March 2023
  • ...e page and clearing house for information for the [[SIGs/Desktop| Desktop SIG]] for Fedora. ...Desktop-releated features and projects; for people and meetings, go to the SIG
    9 KB (1,129 words) - 19:11, 15 August 2015
  • In addition to the Defensive Coding book the Security SIG is charged with creating training resources. Videos and smaller articles o
    4 KB (649 words) - 15:14, 4 March 2021
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    4 KB (536 words) - 20:32, 2 February 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    19 KB (3,031 words) - 12:17, 28 May 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * SIG: ELN SIG <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    13 KB (2,091 words) - 19:34, 9 February 2022
  • * Approved by Spins SIG and only require board approval for trademark usage | style="color: #42427e" | Board, Spins SIG, Rel-Eng
    53 KB (7,058 words) - 09:06, 18 September 2016
  • * Explore the possibility of a SIG like structure to continue the work on Fedora
    4 KB (562 words) - 08:31, 22 February 2017
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    28 KB (4,436 words) - 07:39, 18 June 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    25 KB (3,491 words) - 14:41, 29 July 2015
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,448 words) - 23:37, 28 September 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    19 KB (2,994 words) - 15:11, 2 August 2021
  • * [[SIGs/KDE| KDE SIG]]
    4 KB (537 words) - 21:42, 17 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    19 KB (3,073 words) - 11:01, 10 July 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    19 KB (2,882 words) - 14:53, 7 July 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,526 words) - 17:27, 3 May 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,648 words) - 14:04, 10 June 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,634 words) - 13:14, 25 October 2019
  • ...ized infrastructure. Other groups may form [[Category:SIGs]]. Over time, a SIG which meets criteria for organization, impact, alignment with the Fedora m
    5 KB (564 words) - 15:57, 8 June 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    5 KB (642 words) - 20:23, 3 January 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,451 words) - 16:05, 2 December 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (3,124 words) - 16:45, 12 September 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    19 KB (3,035 words) - 16:54, 9 December 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Responsible SIG: Node.js SIG
    14 KB (2,265 words) - 11:01, 21 May 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,627 words) - 10:26, 24 May 2023
  • .... The objective will bring together Ambassadors, Ambassador Emeritus, Join SIG, and Advocates all under the same umbrella of CommOps in a clear and cohesi
    4 KB (586 words) - 14:04, 7 February 2024
  • * El [[SIGs/Xfce/es|Xfce SIG]] (Grupo de interés especial) es un grupo de colaboradores de Fedora que a
    3 KB (565 words) - 16:44, 11 May 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,599 words) - 16:22, 8 December 2021
  • * Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]] and [[Haskell_SIG| Haskell SIG]]
    4 KB (670 words) - 06:01, 25 February 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Name: [[Cloud SIG]]
    14 KB (2,290 words) - 15:26, 9 April 2024
  • * '''{{fpchat|#fedora-power}}''' - Chat related to the Power Management SIG ...{{fpchat|#fedora-science}}''' - Chat related to the Science and Technology SIG
    24 KB (3,549 words) - 18:30, 1 January 2023
  • The Fedora Cloud Working Group and Special Interest Group (SIG) has been busy leading up to Fedora 21. Cloud is now a top-level product fo ...work for Fedora 21, [[Changes/Modular_Kernel_Packaging_for_Cloud|the cloud SIG and kernel team split the kernel]] into two packages. One package contains
    9 KB (1,480 words) - 11:40, 9 October 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,630 words) - 06:03, 21 February 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (3,198 words) - 19:13, 15 July 2020
  • ...ner-sig/issue/45 util-linux] and [https://pagure.io/ContainerSIG/container-sig/issue/46 shadow-utils] ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    15 KB (2,391 words) - 19:11, 20 November 2020
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (606 words) - 06:11, 30 December 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,626 words) - 19:53, 18 March 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (3,138 words) - 18:25, 6 January 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,620 words) - 14:30, 22 April 2024
  • | 12:00-12:30 || 16:00-16:30 || 18:00-18:30 || [Talk-25] '''Fedora Join SIG Ninjas''' - Vipul Siddharth, Alberto Rodriguez S., Akashdeep Dhar, Andi Art ...edorapeople.org/~davdunc/State-of-the-Cloud-SIG.odp The State of the Cloud SIG]''' - David Duncan
    13 KB (1,557 words) - 10:55, 1 October 2021
  • === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 09/2008 === === Fedora SIG KDE Meeting 2008-02-26 ===
    26 KB (3,653 words) - 21:21, 20 September 2016
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    22 KB (3,431 words) - 16:54, 3 July 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,462 words) - 13:46, 27 January 2021
  • ...red as an i686 SIG was to be created to handle issues going forward. That SIG has been largely unresponsive. The only thread so far this year has been a
    10 KB (1,687 words) - 16:56, 10 July 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,725 words) - 19:48, 28 February 2024
  • The goal of the Embedded Systems SIG is to make Fedora the number one choice for developers of embedded systems
    5 KB (614 words) - 21:20, 4 April 2018
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    17 KB (2,554 words) - 18:02, 22 July 2019
  • {{header|cloud-sig}} <!-- The code for this page is kept at https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/blob/main/f/PRD.mw and should be edited and merged from there -->
    10 KB (1,494 words) - 20:45, 1 November 2022
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    22 KB (3,349 words) - 16:55, 15 April 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    4 KB (607 words) - 08:05, 8 August 2017
  • to -- please ask the EPEL SIG members in case you are in doubt if your repository. Thus the EPEL SIG wrote this policy that describes the
    15 KB (2,523 words) - 20:02, 6 January 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    10 KB (1,692 words) - 16:35, 2 August 2022
  • ...formalizada. Outros grupos podem formar [[Category:SIGs]]. Com o tempo, um SIG que atenda aos critérios de organização, impacto, alinhamento com a miss
    4 KB (618 words) - 13:18, 27 October 2019
  • * Let them know there is something like Fedora Ruby SIG that they can join
    5 KB (645 words) - 23:08, 12 September 2019
  • ...over IP applications as possible for Fedora. To that end, members of this SIG will assist in packaging VoIP applications and make reviewing VoIP-related ...''Applications/Libraries Being Packaged'' list. Interested in joining the SIG? Just add your WikiName to the list.
    10 KB (1,503 words) - 08:48, 2 February 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,602 words) - 15:57, 8 May 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
    16 KB (2,506 words) - 18:28, 23 June 2020
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    22 KB (3,109 words) - 15:21, 6 March 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,659 words) - 15:29, 22 September 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,501 words) - 13:29, 7 February 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    21 KB (3,278 words) - 21:47, 12 February 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,652 words) - 21:14, 4 October 2019
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    4 KB (588 words) - 13:48, 21 November 2017
  • The PyTorch SIG meets bi weekly, contributing to the meeting is the best way to engage with
    5 KB (695 words) - 13:58, 12 March 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,789 words) - 08:16, 3 October 2016
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    4 KB (616 words) - 22:02, 19 July 2019
  • * Name: [[User:pviktori| Petr Viktorin]], [[SIGs/Python| Python SIG]] ...ists.fedoraproject.org/thread/ZCNUQBJLDUJUJXK2EOPP2MWL6FJKLBPS/ the Python SIG list discussion thread].
    19 KB (2,804 words) - 15:51, 30 June 2021
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (673 words) - 11:38, 8 December 2017
  • * [[Fonts SIG mailing lists|proponer]] buenas tipografías a Fedora. * [[Fonts SIG mailing lists|proponer]] buenas tipografías para Fedora,
    19 KB (2,749 words) - 15:32, 11 October 2018
  • ...duction of cloud images for Fedora Linux 38 and Fedora Linux 39, the cloud-sig team did significant work to support transition from the current ImageFacto ...ns ideal qualities of our current tooling in a way that benefits the cloud-sig and the community at large. We have cultivated a strong relationship with t
    15 KB (2,290 words) - 19:57, 28 February 2024
  • Outros grupos podem formar [[Category:SIGs]]. Com o tempo, um SIG que satisfaça os critérios de organização, impacto, alinhamento com a m
    4 KB (624 words) - 14:03, 6 June 2017
  • * Cloud SIG - [[user:dustymabe|Dusty Mabe]] (dustymabe),
    5 KB (797 words) - 19:39, 26 June 2015
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,728 words) - 13:37, 4 October 2022
  • * Cloud SIG should discuss ordering of qcow downloads vs. vagrant vs. ec2 launch
    4 KB (681 words) - 22:26, 15 October 2015
  • <!-- All fields on this form are required to be accepted by the Spins SIG <!-- After the Spins SIG has reviewed and accepted your Spins Page the spins wrangler will change it
    11 KB (1,695 words) - 22:54, 23 June 2015
  • * [[SIGs/AudioCreation| Audio Creation SIG]] - This Special Interest Group is dedicated to the packaging of media pro
    5 KB (721 words) - 20:25, 21 October 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,841 words) - 18:09, 4 January 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,428 words) - 14:34, 14 July 2015
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,624 words) - 23:39, 28 September 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,773 words) - 08:56, 31 August 2016
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. --> ...ckage that will be installed by default on some Editions/Spins (each WG or SIG will need to make their own decision on whether to ship modules enabled by
    11 KB (1,780 words) - 14:35, 2 March 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,896 words) - 10:22, 6 September 2018
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    5 KB (707 words) - 09:51, 23 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,817 words) - 18:31, 22 July 2019
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    21 KB (3,268 words) - 16:33, 16 July 2020
  • * Email: pvalena@redhat.com, jprokop@redhat.com, ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
    7 KB (923 words) - 20:22, 3 February 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,654 words) - 20:11, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,856 words) - 10:33, 30 September 2016
  • | {{result|warn|geraldosimiao}}<ref>no user switching since F35. KDE SIG aware</ref>
    18 KB (2,342 words) - 15:44, 28 April 2022
  • * Owner: Remi Collet and PHP SIG * Owner: Peter Lemenkov, Fedora Erlang SIG, Randy Barlow, Jeremy Cline
    14 KB (2,006 words) - 09:02, 10 October 2016
  • .../Cloud_Cooperation | Explore opportunities for cooperation with Cloud WG / SIG]] (IRC 2021-06-02)
    5 KB (733 words) - 08:40, 8 April 2024
  • * State of the SIG ** SIG page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Red_Team
    23 KB (3,267 words) - 15:14, 6 October 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,907 words) - 10:38, 16 November 2023
  • <!-- All fields on this form are required to be accepted by the Spins SIG <!-- After the Spins SIG has reviewed and accepted your Spins Page the spins wrangler will change it
    11 KB (1,760 words) - 01:40, 17 July 2023
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (712 words) - 11:39, 8 December 2017
  • ...ims to be directly under the umbrella of the Fedora Science and Technology SIG. || 2011-10-24 || Approved for F16 || Yes
    5 KB (711 words) - 15:16, 18 September 2016
  • ...ims to be directly under the umbrella of the Fedora Science and Technology SIG. || 2011-10-24 || Approved for F18 || Yes
    5 KB (701 words) - 15:16, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,533 words) - 17:36, 25 May 2021
  • The Fedora KDE SIG has [[Changes/KDE411|rebased to KDE 4.11]] for Fedora 20. This release incl The Fedora Cloud SIG has been working hard to provide images that are well-suited for running as
    10 KB (1,497 words) - 13:58, 18 September 2016
  • | 9:00-9:30 AM || 2:00-2:30 PM || [https://youtu.be/G4iXisa_GVM Cloud Server SIG] || David Duncan|| A Look at Fedora 35 Cloud Base Image and the Working Gr
    5 KB (775 words) - 15:05, 2 December 2021
  • ...ose, mentioned in FDSCo meeting today...I thought something like Rel Notes SIG, acting as an umbrella for all of the ... above might achieve this better c === Fedora SIG EPEL Report Week 05/2008 ===
    29 KB (3,982 words) - 21:06, 20 September 2016
  • ...ficial Fedora kickstart files are kept in git, and maintained by the spins SIG.
    5 KB (735 words) - 15:18, 18 May 2016
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (634 words) - 06:55, 22 April 2016
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (709 words) - 16:02, 17 November 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,486 words) - 06:25, 17 August 2021
  • * Other developers: Owners of packages that fail to rebuild, mainly perl-sig users, will be asked using Bugzilla to fix or remove their packages from th
    5 KB (736 words) - 12:04, 22 May 2024
  • ...newly created [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Flatpak Fedora Flatpak SIG] aims to correct this situation, and will be the group that is responsible The SIG will work to improve the general state of Fedora Flatpaks, including docume
    12 KB (1,762 words) - 21:17, 26 January 2023
  • [[Category:Astronomy SIG|Packages]]
    5 KB (640 words) - 07:15, 1 September 2021
  • * Fedora Cloud Lead - Work closely with Fedora Cloud SIG, identify areas for cloud technology adoption, compose cloud strategies for ...et it done. Some old notes can be found at the [[Messaging_SIG | Messaging SIG page]].
    10 KB (1,632 words) - 16:58, 15 February 2018
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (701 words) - 18:00, 4 June 2022
  • current practices from the Go SIG. As a result of new RPM macros developed by Nicolas Mailhot, some members of the Go SIG wishes to
    16 KB (2,150 words) - 14:53, 31 March 2020
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    5 KB (680 words) - 08:33, 30 December 2017
  • ...amw discussed the Cloud SIG test day, tflink will follow-up with the Cloud SIG for an event recap # tflink to follow-up with cloud sig for test day recap
    44 KB (5,275 words) - 09:04, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,819 words) - 12:34, 9 February 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (2,251 words) - 06:43, 18 July 2016
  • [[Category:Cloud SIG]]
    6 KB (674 words) - 08:04, 29 May 2017
  • * [[SIGs/KDE| KDE SIG]]
    5 KB (701 words) - 14:03, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (1,978 words) - 14:44, 12 September 2023
  • * Members of the [[SIGs/Python|Python SIG]] from LATAM, EMEA and NA will get in touch.
    6 KB (789 words) - 14:00, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    18 KB (2,783 words) - 12:47, 25 July 2023
  • ...ý]], [[User:Fale|Fabio Alessandro Locati]] as well as the rest of the sway-sig ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,912 words) - 01:13, 3 April 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    11 KB (1,617 words) - 22:53, 10 February 2021
  • ...los empaquetados nuevos, Grupos de Interés Especial (SIGs), Supervisión de SIG, el proceso de empaquetado, manipulación y ejecución de cuestiones de man
    4 KB (707 words) - 12:06, 29 September 2018
  • * The Xfce SIG has chosen to drop totem and totem-mozplugin in favor of parole and parole- ...Xfce as the official browser of their Desktop Environment, we as the Xfce SIG would like to keep this browser showcased but we will continue to ship Mozi
    14 KB (2,059 words) - 19:35, 26 June 2015
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    18 KB (2,789 words) - 16:11, 24 September 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,996 words) - 16:23, 6 January 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,959 words) - 14:32, 27 July 2020
  • The owners of this change are the HC SIG (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/HC)
    5 KB (822 words) - 20:31, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,016 words) - 18:15, 8 May 2023
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    21 KB (2,297 words) - 21:21, 30 June 2017
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. --> ...e, please contact the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Flatpak Flatpak SIG] matrix room.
    12 KB (1,885 words) - 13:58, 22 June 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    5 KB (782 words) - 17:05, 22 April 2016
  • * Name: [[User:Petersen| Jens Petersen]] (Haskell SIG)
    6 KB (815 words) - 01:36, 10 August 2021
  • * Let them know there is something like Fedora Ruby SIG that they can join
    5 KB (709 words) - 01:57, 13 September 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,080 words) - 18:18, 1 March 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,018 words) - 20:23, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,959 words) - 11:12, 19 September 2017
  • ...The objective will bring together Ambassadors, Ambassador Emeritus, Join SIG, and Advocates all under the same umbrella of CommOps in a clear and cohesi * Completion of Role Handbooks for CommOps, Join SIG, Advocate, Ambassador, Ambassador Emeritus. Timeline: February 2021 - June
    15 KB (2,036 words) - 14:05, 7 February 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    20 KB (3,414 words) - 15:11, 20 May 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,961 words) - 23:42, 12 April 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    19 KB (3,056 words) - 20:07, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    17 KB (2,783 words) - 20:05, 28 February 2024
  • * Name: Maxwell G; Benjamin Beasley; Python SIG
    6 KB (809 words) - 19:52, 14 November 2023
  • ...request block the [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011110 ML-SIG Review Tracker] and send a link to the review request in at least [https://
    12 KB (1,812 words) - 13:37, 10 November 2023
  • * Name: [[Haskell_SIG|Haskell SIG]]
    5 KB (821 words) - 02:59, 12 August 2019
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    6 KB (884 words) - 19:18, 3 November 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    5 KB (765 words) - 13:49, 21 January 2016
  • * Email: pvalena@redhat.com, vondruch@redhat.com, jaruga@redhat.com, ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
    7 KB (999 words) - 18:11, 7 August 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,027 words) - 10:37, 7 February 2022
  • The Fedora Cloud SIG has been working hard on providing images that are well-suited to running a The Fedora KDE SIG has [[Changes/KDE411|rebased to KDE 4.11]] for Fedora 20. This release incl
    11 KB (1,700 words) - 11:38, 9 October 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,126 words) - 15:34, 30 August 2023
  • * Name: [[User:Peter|Peter Lemenkov]], [[SIGs/Erlang|Fedora Erlang SIG]], [[User:bowlofeggs|Randy Barlow]], [[User:jcline|Jeremy Cline]]
    5 KB (752 words) - 16:43, 21 April 2021
  • * Email: pvalena@redhat.com, vondruch@redhat.com, jaruga@redhat.com, ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
    7 KB (959 words) - 17:53, 7 January 2021
  • ...nct|See [https://gregdekspeaks.wordpress.com/2012/01/06/why-the-fedora-isv-sig-never-caught-fire/ Greg DeKoenigsberg's excellent postmortem blog post].}}
    5 KB (804 words) - 20:46, 19 September 2016
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (785 words) - 20:50, 19 September 2015
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,106 words) - 14:40, 2 March 2018
  • ...ims to be directly under the umbrella of the Fedora Science and Technology SIG. || 2011-10-24 || Approved for F18 || Yes
    5 KB (789 words) - 15:17, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    13 KB (2,179 words) - 18:11, 4 September 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,253 words) - 12:28, 25 April 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    12 KB (1,886 words) - 15:12, 2 March 2018
  • ...lock for the work that he has done with the Store SIG. I started the Store SIG a few months ago when I had some extra time, and as an attempt to bring som === Store SIG Update - a.k.a. State of the SIG ===
    41 KB (5,924 words) - 21:09, 20 September 2016
  • ...ps://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig] is a perfect place for complaints or general feedback. You may also check ...to https://fedorahosted.org/irc-support-sig to file a feedback ticket. The SIG will discuss in their next weekly meeting.
    12 KB (1,969 words) - 18:24, 3 April 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    6 KB (864 words) - 20:24, 28 February 2024
  • * Name: [[User:Peter|Peter Lemenkov]], [[SIGs/Erlang|Fedora Erlang SIG]], [[User:bowlofeggs|Randy Barlow]], [[User:jcline|Jeremy Cline]]
    6 KB (807 words) - 16:06, 1 July 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    6 KB (865 words) - 10:17, 7 April 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,221 words) - 21:58, 1 August 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,224 words) - 23:19, 20 December 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,152 words) - 20:26, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,156 words) - 20:37, 28 February 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    30 KB (4,688 words) - 11:12, 17 July 2019
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (827 words) - 14:30, 12 December 2017
  • [[Category:Astronomy SIG|Packages, wishlist]]
    6 KB (975 words) - 17:41, 15 March 2016
  • ;SIG {{Anchor|SIG}} :Пожалуйста не используйте больше сокращение ГпИ, вместо него используйте SIG как есть.
    28 KB (1,535 words) - 20:57, 19 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,129 words) - 16:10, 25 February 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,248 words) - 11:07, 10 December 2020
  • The Fedora Cloud Working Group and Special Interest Group (SIG) has been busy leading up to Fedora 21. Cloud is now a top-level product fo
    6 KB (911 words) - 01:28, 22 June 2017
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (817 words) - 06:04, 21 November 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    18 KB (2,770 words) - 10:59, 7 January 2021
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    26 KB (4,012 words) - 23:11, 15 June 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,205 words) - 20:40, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,284 words) - 10:53, 5 March 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    6 KB (850 words) - 13:03, 23 November 2018
  • ...kickstart file and will - once it's somehow ready - submit it to the Spin SIG for technical approval.</td></tr> ...ink it might be a good idea - not necessarily before submitting it to Spin SIG, but I think such a testing can't be too bad. So a +1 here.</td></tr>
    38 KB (5,880 words) - 10:15, 18 September 2016
  • Phosh is a Wayland shell for mobile devices based on Gnome. The mobility SIG has packaged up Phosh and related packages into a 'phosh-desktop' package g ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    14 KB (2,243 words) - 18:12, 1 December 2022
  • [[Category:Summer Coding SIG]]
    7 KB (1,058 words) - 15:35, 18 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    6 KB (854 words) - 17:30, 3 January 2017
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (784 words) - 08:54, 30 December 2017
  • == Fedora Education SIG Meeting 5th June 2009 == | colspan="3" | * mchua is new to the edu sig - is our goal to make fedora useful to teachers (using it personally, using
    68 KB (9,568 words) - 10:14, 18 September 2016
  • * Owner: Owen Taylor, Neal Gompa [on behalf of the KDE SIG] * Owner: Petr Viktorin, Python SIG
    23 KB (3,043 words) - 17:18, 2 November 2021
  • * http://borntobeopen.blogspot.com/2012/02/be-active-kde-sig-fad-at-devconf-brno.html ...fedorapeople.org/devconf2012/jskarvad-PowerManagement.pdf Power management SIG] ''(coreOS)'' ||Michal Linhard - [http://rvokal.fedorapeople.org/devconf20
    32 KB (4,839 words) - 14:17, 23 March 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    20 KB (3,089 words) - 11:26, 9 October 2021
  • Scratchpad of ideas for reviving Fedora Games SIG * Grow interest with the SIG, gain new members, build up membership by explaining what our objectives ou
    17 KB (2,545 words) - 09:22, 24 December 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,241 words) - 22:31, 12 April 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    6 KB (841 words) - 19:54, 14 September 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,267 words) - 16:42, 2 August 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,294 words) - 16:06, 1 July 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,246 words) - 19:05, 14 July 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,298 words) - 20:44, 3 August 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,243 words) - 07:21, 28 March 2022
  • * Email: pvalena@redhat.com, vondruch@redhat.com, jaruga@redhat.com, ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
    7 KB (1,039 words) - 20:43, 15 June 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,399 words) - 14:25, 5 January 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,230 words) - 23:40, 28 September 2023
  • ...n}} || {{caution}} || {{caution}} || AUS => BRU || en || Fedora DEI, Cloud SiG, CentOS ..., de, cz || Presenting in Distribution Devroom & CentOS Connect, Fedora i3 SIG
    26 KB (3,303 words) - 15:41, 1 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,185 words) - 10:31, 10 September 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,358 words) - 08:46, 11 March 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,201 words) - 11:23, 19 February 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,291 words) - 19:48, 17 December 2020
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (845 words) - 06:12, 6 June 2019
  • * [[SIGs/KDE| KDE SIG]] (jreznik AT redhat DOT com)
    6 KB (851 words) - 21:42, 17 September 2016
  • ==== SIG (groupes d’intérêt spécial) ==== * '''{{fpchat|#fedora-power}}''' – Conversation relative au SIG sur la gestion de l’énergie
    30 KB (4,299 words) - 08:26, 23 April 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,427 words) - 14:29, 10 February 2023
  • ...ed the KDE Red Hat project. He is also an active member of the Fedora KDE SIG. Rex lives in Omaha, Nebraska, with his wife, 2 children, and 4 cats. ...KDE, WebKit security team) and several Fedora subprojects (KDE SIG, WebKit SIG, Board...). In his free time he's one of the co-founders of Openmobility -
    26 KB (4,105 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,267 words) - 15:13, 4 February 2022
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (887 words) - 11:45, 8 December 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,314 words) - 18:15, 14 December 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,420 words) - 06:39, 4 April 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,357 words) - 17:56, 9 December 2022
  • ** Participation in the [[SIGs/FedoraMini|Fedora Mini SIG]] on behalf of Oregon State University's Computer Science Platform for Lear ** Fedora OLPC SIG member
    21 KB (3,042 words) - 20:20, 19 September 2016
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    6 KB (851 words) - 06:29, 30 December 2017
  • * What has kept you from joining Ambassadors/CommOps/Join SIG? Join SIG -> Join SIG changes to Join Team to improve branding
    22 KB (3,594 words) - 01:06, 10 May 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. * Email: pemensik at redhat.com, dns-sig at fedoraproject dot org
    14 KB (2,271 words) - 16:27, 29 January 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,294 words) - 22:41, 8 February 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    7 KB (1,049 words) - 07:25, 24 August 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,312 words) - 22:19, 19 December 2022
  • * '''Fedora Games SIG Artwork''' - interested in developing artwork for some of the games in Fedo
    10 KB (920 words) - 20:56, 20 September 2016
  • ...out environment and the future of that in the opinion of the Fedora Cloud SIG is OpenShift. We believe Fedora + OpenShift is the future of "The Platform"
    6 KB (976 words) - 17:42, 20 July 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,345 words) - 14:06, 21 December 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,406 words) - 13:00, 11 April 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,330 words) - 08:36, 20 February 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,377 words) - 17:59, 8 July 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,493 words) - 09:14, 10 July 2023
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    7 KB (935 words) - 17:12, 19 February 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,320 words) - 06:22, 21 October 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,378 words) - 23:21, 2 March 2024
  • ...ithin SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    24 KB (2,481 words) - 15:35, 25 July 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,423 words) - 18:22, 1 June 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    19 KB (2,930 words) - 20:50, 28 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,303 words) - 18:26, 1 July 2022
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    6 KB (980 words) - 08:31, 12 December 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,390 words) - 21:04, 15 July 2022
  • * Email: pvalena@redhat.com, vondruch@redhat.com, jaruga@redhat.com, ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
    7 KB (1,056 words) - 17:35, 12 October 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,499 words) - 15:25, 12 October 2021
  • {{CompactHeader|fonts-sig}}
    7 KB (943 words) - 20:27, 23 March 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,289 words) - 11:46, 27 November 2023
  • ...ubjects are therefore heavily inter-related. There is a [[Cloud_SIG |Cloud SIG]] (Special Interest Group) dedicated to the subject, worth to follow as wel
    7 KB (995 words) - 07:08, 29 October 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,442 words) - 15:55, 2 February 2021
  • See java SIG plans: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/devconf/2018/changesInjavaReleasePro * Owner: Peter Lemenkov, Fedora Erlang SIG, Randy Barlow, Jeremy Cline
    23 KB (3,015 words) - 20:46, 23 April 2018
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,400 words) - 11:50, 7 October 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,312 words) - 10:29, 4 September 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,460 words) - 20:13, 12 January 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,468 words) - 16:40, 7 September 2022
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (1,013 words) - 20:30, 19 September 2016
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    6 KB (997 words) - 11:08, 26 June 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,396 words) - 23:23, 28 September 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    14 KB (2,284 words) - 14:12, 12 May 2020
  • * '''{{fpchat|#fedora-power}}''' - Chat related to the Power Management SIG ...{{fpchat|#fedora-science}}''' - Chat related to the Science and Technology SIG
    26 KB (3,843 words) - 10:43, 21 May 2020
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,508 words) - 23:24, 28 September 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,479 words) - 20:12, 26 September 2022
  • ...;"|{{projectline|:Category:SIGs|Voir tous les groupes d'intérêts spéciaux (SIG)…||Echo-SIGs-48px.png}}
    6 KB (871 words) - 21:50, 9 October 2017
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,588 words) - 15:40, 4 January 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
    7 KB (1,047 words) - 17:52, 25 January 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,492 words) - 23:26, 28 September 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,423 words) - 08:25, 1 December 2021
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,515 words) - 17:03, 13 January 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,416 words) - 11:51, 2 February 2024
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,427 words) - 17:56, 18 July 2023
  • ...ims to be directly under the umbrella of the Fedora Science and Technology SIG. || 2011-10-24 || Approved for F18 || Yes || N/A || [[Scientific_Packages_T
    6 KB (966 words) - 15:17, 18 September 2016
  • * Cloud SIG - [[user:dustymabe|Dusty Mabe]] (dustymabe),
    8 KB (1,137 words) - 21:44, 19 September 2016
  • ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    7 KB (1,158 words) - 17:53, 21 January 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,524 words) - 19:25, 19 October 2023
  • ...r:alebastr| Aleksei Bavshin]], [[User:Fale|Fabio Alessandro Locati]], Sway SIG
    7 KB (1,082 words) - 23:40, 28 September 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,582 words) - 23:41, 28 September 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    19 KB (2,971 words) - 17:02, 13 January 2022
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    16 KB (2,530 words) - 20:27, 18 December 2023
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,484 words) - 03:40, 30 January 2019
  • ...owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages. ...technical issues need to be resolved. If the change proposal is owned by a SIG, please also add a primary contact person. -->
    15 KB (2,378 words) - 18:55, 14 July 2021
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)